Thread: Moving forward against religion
-
August 13th 2008, 11:36 PM #1
Moving forward against religion
1. Stop representing science is on the path of solving the mysteries of the universe. Our goal is to convince everyone that that love and curiosity are enough.
2. We should be open to extra-ordinary experiences and claims, even though we know the metaphysics and dogmas of religion are not true.' We should be open to the idea that consciousness is not merely a matter of calculations until neuroscience does more research on what it is (which will likely happen in the next couple decades).
3. We are at our strongest we we discuss issues, but weakest when we label ourselves under a common banner (new atheism, brights, etc). Assume the best: look confused then insulted when asked what you are.
4. Watch Dan Dennett's speech on good reasons to believe in god. It is dense with content and requires full attention. It is about an hour.
(starts at 17:20) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyyRA...eature=related
part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OlGn...eature=relatedLast edited by avaya; August 13th 2008 at 11:59 PM.
-
August 16th 2008, 02:30 AM #2
Re: Moving forward against religion
Right now, there are only a few places where I think people should be on guard against religious influence and actively campaign against it.
In our schools, in our government, and of course, Islam everywhere...
Otherwise, I don't care what people believe.my reading comprehension is nearly prefect
-
August 21st 2008, 12:34 AM #3
Re: Moving forward against religion
There are a couple reasons I care -
1. All of the moderate Christians/Muslims/etc are sort of "on call" at any time. If some major event happens (like a giant natural disaster or nuclear attack etc) we will have a country receptive to nutcases preaching about the glorious end of days. That can not end well.
2. Any reasonable intuition about what life is would allow federal funding of stem cell research. Only religious moderates are preventing it.
3. Without religious moderates, religious nutcases (and religious terrorists) will lose a lot of ground/support/recruits.
4. Only a religious organization could openly protect child rapists, and still maintain millions of people looking to them as a source for morality. The Catholic Church exists because of the "casual" Catholics.
-
August 22nd 2008, 07:50 PM #4
Re: Moving forward against religion
Last edited by Mountain Man; August 23rd 2008 at 08:39 PM.
“History is the witness that testifies to the passing of time; it illumines reality, vitalizes memory, provides guidance in daily life and brings us tidings of antiquity.”
-Cicero
“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.”
-Mark Twain
"Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness."
-Terry Pratchett
-
August 22nd 2008, 11:46 PM #5
Re: Moving forward against religion
Millions of people look to NAMBLA as a source of morality? No.
Has the ACLU ever defended a NAMBLA member from rape charges? No.
Nicholas is correct - Christians are not allowed to post in here.
Similar Threads
-
ID: Which way forward?
By pancreasman in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 75Last Post: April 1st 2010, 06:50 PM -
Something to look forward to.
By Alan3838 in forum Civics 101Replies: 0Last Post: November 3rd 2008, 08:52 PM -
Essay: "Moving Forward in Baptist-Catholic Conversation"
By ChrisChillin in forum Ecclesiology 201Replies: 6Last Post: March 19th 2008, 05:00 PM -
Stickers which don't mention religion ordered off GA textbooks for promoting religion
By The Laughing Man in forum Civics 101Replies: 38Last Post: January 25th 2005, 07:43 PM















































































Quote



Brutal cleaver assault on British...
Today, 03:56 PM in Civics 101