-
September 9th 2009, 09:38 PM #31
Re: Anthropic principle versus multi-verse
I don't think the multiverse hypothesis/hypotheses disprove the existence of God, and believe that atheists that use it as an argument against theism are probably scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Frankly, I like the idea of a multiverse. The possibilities are endless ...
O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams.
-
September 14th 2009, 02:29 PM #32
-
September 14th 2009, 02:48 PM #33
Re: Anthropic principle versus multi-verse
I think that Glenn’s argument that the multiverse scenario (according to which there are tokens of all physically possible universe types) entails that we have no free will is fallacious.
The mere thesis that I have a counterpart in another universe who makes different choices than I do (in relevantly similar circumstances to my own) doesn’t entail that my own choices aren't free. I don’t see how the entailment suddenly holds if we add that, for every choice I could have made in a given set of circumstances, a counterpart of mine in some other universe makes that choice in relevantly similar circumstances. What do my counterparts have to do with me?
Even if it turns out that it is a law of nature that there be tokens of every physically possible universe type, so that the laws of nature guarantee that some counterpart of me will, say, choose to take up a life of crime, it doesn’t follow that the laws of nature entail that I will choose to take up a life of crime. Nor does it follow that the laws of nature entail that my counterpart who actually does end up taking up a life of crime does so because the laws of nature entailed that he would do it. All that follows is that the laws of nature entail that someone will fill the role of being the counterpart who takes up a life of crime. That’s consistent with it being the case that, for any guy who actually ends up filling the role, that guy could have done otherwise.Last edited by Kenny; September 14th 2009 at 03:15 PM.
To be the value of a bound variable or not to be
-
September 14th 2009, 09:19 PM #34
Re: Anthropic principle versus multi-verse
Go with the flow the river knows.
Frank Doonan
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Gifts of jade-silk change weapons and war into peace and friendship.
I do not know, therefore I think . . . and everything is in pencil.
Similar Threads
-
Strong Anthropic Principle
By Yamyam in forum Theology 201Replies: 9Last Post: August 27th 2005, 05:29 AM -
Tegmark's Multi-verse (some thoughts)
By OckhamsRazor in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 8Last Post: August 30th 2004, 09:04 PM -
The Anthropic Principle
By apologetics in forum Philosophy 201Replies: 18Last Post: April 5th 2004, 08:20 PM -
Anthropic Principle
By Solly in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 71Last Post: April 28th 2003, 03:36 AM















































































Quote



Globalization isn't all its...
Yesterday, 10:28 PM in Civics 101