-
August 8th 2008, 12:03 AM #1
Crazy interpretation of the Flood
It's just something I've invented, it's not factual, and it's not ahem..."God-breathed".
I was thinking that the Flood could be an "artistic" rendering of a disease's deadly outbreak and the early men's attempts to quarantine themselves from it. You see, if there's another calamity that spreads and kills that resemble the flood, I think it would be something as deadly as an Ebola or an ancient strain of an AIDS virus. Many viruses could transmit from animal to man, and vice-versa. The "ark" was probably a settlement away from civilization where uninfected animals and humans had lived for many years until the virus killed off the population. There could be rains and a series of floods which would kill the people and the animals with weakened immune systems.
Tall tale, isn't it?
-
August 9th 2008, 04:01 PM #2
Re: Crazy interpretation of the Flood
Why do you think they felt the need to tell a different story if that is indeed what happened?
-
August 11th 2008, 04:46 AM #3
-
August 11th 2008, 07:04 AM #4
-
August 11th 2008, 12:13 PM #5
Re: Crazy interpretation of the Flood
Neither did the "Flood".
-
August 11th 2008, 05:47 PM #6
Similar Threads
-
Why flood in Noah’s time and the impending fire-flood in our time?
By stephen goswami in forum Eschatology 201Replies: 6Last Post: May 17th 2009, 06:39 PM -
The Flood of Noah/Flood in Revelation
By InChristAlways in forum Unorthodox Theology 201Replies: 0Last Post: March 14th 2005, 09:52 PM -
Crazy Day
By Stephen in forum Chaplain's OfficeReplies: 12Last Post: November 3rd 2004, 03:26 PM -
The flood, and the Freudian Bible Interpretation
By sylas in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 17Last Post: October 17th 2004, 12:23 PM















































































Quote



Globalization isn't all its...
Yesterday, 10:28 PM in Civics 101