Stone Henge May have been a

[Cu Mhorrigan]

Cremation center and Not a Healing center: According to some Archeologists...

Interesting and Short Article. Personally I subscribe to it being Multi use....

[Sparko]

you mean it isn't Noah's boat dock after all?

[Cu Mhorrigan]

you mean it isn't Noah's boat dock after all?

Well Gilgamesh May have stopped by once or twice ;)

[Rayado]

In before Garry Denke.

[Sparko]

In before Garry Denke.

[Manwë Súlimo]

Okay, seriously guys, I've asked this a few times before and no one answered me. Is Garry Denke & Co. serious when they come up with these bizarre claims?

[Dee Dee Warren]

Okay, seriously guys, I've asked this a few times before and no one answered me. Is Garry Denke & Co. serious when they come up with these bizarre claims?

Yes he is.

[Manwë Súlimo]

Yes he is.

:-(

[Crow]

Cremation center and Not a Healing center: According to some Archeologists...

Interesting and Short Article. Personally I subscribe to it being Multi use....

I hope y'all realize that you just laid down some serious crazy bait.

[rogue06]

Cremation center and Not a Healing center: According to some Archeologists...

Interesting and Short Article. Personally I subscribe to it being Multi use....

You beat me to it.

Stonehenge is older than we thought by around 500 years:

Stonehenge 'older than believed'

New findings at Stonehenge suggest its stones were erected much earlier than thought, challenging the site's conventional history.

A new excavation puts the stones' arrival at 3000 BC - almost 500 years earlier than originally thought - and suggests it was mainly a burial site.

The latest results are from a dig by the Stonehenge Riverside Project.

It is in conflict with recent research dating construction to 2300 BC and suggesting it was a healing centre.

The 2300 BC date was arrived at by carbon dating and was the major finding from an excavation inside the henge by professors Tim Darvill and Geoff Wainwright.



Source

© source where applicable

As the above article noted, it also appears Stonehenge wasn’t a healing center but was instead a crematorium:

Stonehenge 'was a cremation cemetry, not healing centre'

Stonehenge was used as a cremation cemetry throughout its history, according to new evidence that divides archaeologists over whether England's most famous ancient monument was about celebrating life or death.

The origins and purposes of Stonehenge have eluded academics and historians for centuries and been the subject of much debate.

The circle of standing stones was originally through to have been erected in 2,600 BC, to replace an earlier wood and earth structure where cremation was carried out.

Recently a BBC documentary suggested that the standing stones were not erected until 2,300BC, when the site became a centre of healing.

Now a team behind the latest dig suggest the standing stones were erected much earlier than previously thought, in 3,000 BC, and used for cremation burial throughout their history and not for healing.



Source

© source where applicable

[Cu Mhorrigan]

Yes, and your point is?

[rogue06]

I hope y'all realize that you just laid down some serious crazy bait.

While this is probably true there have been some interesting discoveries being made there and it would be a shame not to mention them just cause it is also a troll call.

[Crow]

I know. But it's like seeing two trains on a converging course, knowing what is going to happen while they are still miles apart.

[Seri]

I know. But it's like seeing two trains on a converging course, knowing what is going to happen while they are still miles apart.

Kind of like whenever spirit5er posts anything?