Originally posted by footwasher
View Post
Basically, I think discussions are much more enjoyable and profitable when they are friendly and polite. First, it is not helpful (nor logically valid) to engage in ad hominem disparagement of your discussion partners. Second, it is better to try and understand someone’s point of view, rather than assuming the worst and arguing against a misrepresentation.
Examples of your introducing ad hominem elements into the discussion:
- Claiming I have no idea what loyalty to the God involves, based on my profile (258)
- Trying to make my cars relevant to this discussion (268), something about attachment to mammon (277)
- Using scripture to suggest that I am a rich, prideful person (260)
- Pretending that I conceded you were right when I did not (267)
- Claiming that I am fearful (264, 267)
- Claiming that I have not experienced, seen, or even know what the Kingdom of God is, and am far from it (250, 268)
- Claiming I was refusing to consider a probable interpretation (268)
- Asking me to demonstrate how I have become a blessing to the world (272)
- Something about nonevangelicals not understanding Paul’s intent (278)
- Claiming that I am ungracious (278)
- Claiming that I am weaseling out of something (281)
Introducing ad hominem elements are not relevant to to the discussion, reflect poorly on you and your inability to support your position, which might lead some to doubt the value of your position, and I believe they reduce your enjoyment of the discussion, presumably because deep down you must know that they are inferior tactics.
Rather than trying to understand my point of view, you assumed that my reasoning was faulty (213), ignored my earlier cautions against taking any one element of my argument out of context (191, 193), and misunderstood me to be belittling the faith of sinners (237). And then, once you identified which element of my argument you were taking out of context (237), and I was able to clarify my statement for you (241), even then you continued to misrepresent my position as claiming that faith is counterproductive and that even Paul claimed faith is counterproductive (245, 278, 281, 285), an absurd position that no one would ever defend. Again, rather than trying to understand my point of view, you presumed I was trying to ‘weasel out of’ my earlier position and that you needed to ‘close all loopholes and escape routes, before I concede defeat’ (278). Even before my clarification for you, it should have been obvious that this absurdity was not my position, if you had paid any attention to any of my previous very positive statements about the faith of believers:
- ‘all who believe/trust (as Christ did)' (120)
- personal faith as in trusting God as Jesus himself did (122)
- faith in Christ as the means and power by which we are redeemed by following the example of the faithfulness of Christ (124)
- the faith witnessed by, founded by, or promoted by Christ (129)
- the same faith in the Father as Jesus (130)
- one (who lives) by the faith of Jesus (141)
- the fides qua, as 'that by which we believe' (144)
- faith that saves, not works of the law, the reality of faith in our lives, a life of continual conversion (148)
- In no way am I diminishing the importance of believing in and trusting Christ Jesus (191)
- The subjective genitive does not diminish the importance of believing in Jesus (191)
- The reading of the subjective genitive here sees a complementarity of Jesus' faithfulness and our faith in Jesus (191, 199)
- The righteousness of God has been manifested through the faith of Jesus Christ for all who believe (191)
- The one who is righteous will live by faith (191, 199)
- We receive the promise of the Spirit through faith (191)
- Denied that your understanding of an umbrella term in 3,22 meant that I was supposedly eliminating the language of faith of believers, pointing you specifically to Paul’s use of πάντας τοὺς πιστεύοντας (193, 195)
- Complementarity of faith, the righteousness of God being revealed in the gospel through the faith of Christ for the faith of all believers (199)
- Agreed that ‘those who are loyal to Christ receive life because of his faithfulness, obedience’ (221)
- I do not question the ability of the believer to have effective faith, faith working through love, so to speak (223)
- I never said or implied that our defective faith prevents God from doing what He promised, in fact I believe the opposite (223)
- God's grace initiates righteousness and faith in our lives (223)
- Our faith in Christ should bear witness to our lives of faithfulness to God, our love of neighbor, even enemies, and respect for all (224)
- The faithfulness of Jesus Christ to God has been given to us so that we too might have the same kind of faithfulness toward God. In this sense our present way of being faithful, of trusting God, of believing in Christ, this life of faith in Christ that we lead, in fact, originated with Jesus' own faithfulness to God (224)
- I have not ever looked askance at the ability of the faith of sinners to make manifest God's righteousness in their own lives (228)
- Yes, indeed, God's righteousness is displayed in the lives of people who hear with faith, who demonstrate loyalty (230)
- I have never questioned the efficacy of faith (230)
- I agree that having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand (230)
- God's grace initiates righteousness and faith in our lives (230)
- The righteousness of God being is made manifest in the faith(fullness) of Christ Jesus, the faith that originated with Christ Jesus, and which is now shared by all believers (234)
- Our lives of belief in God, his Christ, and our lives of faithfulness, do make manifest God's righteousness (241)
- I am certainly not endorsing any contrary ascendancy of self-effort and failure over faith and fulfillment, rather the opposite (242)
- I certainly believe God values our faith (244)
Rather than trying to seize upon an apparent mistake and ignoring or distorting the obvious or likely positions of others, I think you will enjoy these conversations more if you try to keep it friendly and polite by not introducing ad hominem elements not assuming the worst and thereby arguing against a misrepresentation.
Comment