Thoughts on the quantum mechanics approach to magickal interpretation? - Page 2

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    Results 16 to 17 of 17
    1. #16
      Jaltus's Avatar
      Jaltus is offline King of the Nerds
      Chatty
       
      Join Date
      January 26th, 2003
      Location
      In the world of books.
      Posts
      19,417
      Male - Christianity
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: Thoughts on the quantum mechanics approach to magickal i

      Quote Originally posted by shadowmaster View Post
      That is wishful thinking indeed.

      Such a notion was originally proposed by Wigner. He eventually realized that so-called "observations" are constantly made by non-conscious (mechanical) objects (like a photographic plate). All that is required is any thermodynamically irreversible process.
      I thought I already made that point when I noted that a mind is not needed, only a detector is.
      For true conversion, click here.

    2. #17
      shadowmaster's Avatar
      shadowmaster is offline Anastasia's Grandad
      ---
       
      Join Date
      June 1st, 2005
      Posts
      19,209
      Male - Christian (other)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: Thoughts on the quantum mechanics approach to magickal i

      Quote Originally posted by Jaltus View Post
      I thought I already made that point when I noted that a mind is not needed, only a detector is.
      You do not count because it is all your fault in the first place.
      (Actually I wanted to show off and bring Wigner into the picture.)
      Evil lurks in the hearts of men.

      Tassman's POON Theory of the universe = It has "arisen naturally from nothing".

      "I do like Tassmans mind" -- Bertatberts

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Similar Threads

    1. Simple algae delves into quantum mechanics.
      By wattsr1 in forum Natural Science 301
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: March 12th 2010, 10:09 AM
    2. Beware the Magickal iphone
      By Dee Dee Warren in forum dizzle's dorm woom
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: June 28th 2007, 01:42 PM
    3. Why is Quantum Mechanics So Hard To Accept?
      By EvoUK in forum Natural Science 301
      Replies: 22
      Last Post: May 28th 2007, 10:55 AM
    4. quantum mechanics and libertarian free will
      By markporter in forum Natural Science 301
      Replies: 38
      Last Post: January 12th 2005, 06:28 AM
    5. Bohmian Mechanics
      By markporter in forum Natural Science 301
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: November 13th 2003, 07:17 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •