Eradicating Antisemitism from the American Public System

[Lili]

Um, no. That's quite possibly the most ignorant thing I've heard in a long time. English has only an indirect connection to Latin through its heavy French influence (due to France at one point conquering England for a time, and French becoming the language of the upper class of England). This connection is not for religious reasons.

Yeah. Those were the Normans, right? I hope my memory is not failing, lol. I did stay awake in history class, haha.

[Lili]

Ugh, it's kind of annoying that you keep making claim after claim after claim that gets refuted. It's obvious that you need to actually research before making such grand claims about history, linguistics, medieval Christianity, etc.

[mastralvarado]

But you specifically stated that they were both possible outcomes, meaning that there were two possibilities. If you list two things and say that they are both possible outcomes you are implying that they are both possibilities.

I was wrong one and two are possibilities. Two is a duality therefore I was both right and not right not at the same time.

[mastralvarado]

Now I want to post an entry from my blog in order to show the readers what evolution of language/speech is.

What's all this talk about evolution being taught in schools and not even evolution of linguistics is mentioned? Students must simply accept the grammar and langue's rules without any question asked with regards to its origin and if any is given it's on a very vague and even misleading manner. In previous studies, it has been shown that the history that is generally accepted is not regarded at all mistaken by most historians. That is not to say that one can know that the majority of historians do consider the "history" in pristine layout, but since it is still being transmitted in classes, there cannot be any argument against the statement above. Historians are not boycotting their classes as movie writers have been doing in recent years.

This may come as a shock to some, but history is not an accurate science considering many auxiliary facts of astronomy, geography, dendrochronology, and even tools such as the calendar which is being used today, have produced highly reasonable theories such as Hungarian Calendar Phantom Time Hypothesis, H.I. Phantom Time Hypothesis, my Tongue of the Sea of Egypt Hypothesis, Carolingian Hoax Hypothesis, David Wilcock's Convergence 2012, Hypotheses and Historical Conspiracy Hypotheses from India and Arabia all which were conducted by independent investigators whose findings and their auxiliary facts have concluded that their is a world wide conspiracy among the higher education elites to bring about monotony (i.e. peace through the falsehood of the usual). Most people certainly consider the calendar that is in use to be the correct calendar; Hungarian Calendar Hypothesis shows a 200 year discrepancy using astronomical calculations and some old Roman historian' writings whilst Herbert Illig's Phantom Time Hypothesis shows an even higher number using the dendrochronological record. The Carolingian Hoax Hypothesis is embedded in both of these hypotheses whilst my own Maltese's Origins Theory regarding the cause of the Carolingian "renaissance" bears some light into the issue. Some may say, "this guy has some nerve to question the calendar's accuracy given atomic clocks and satellites that synchronize GMT as well some of these crazy New Age Theories" To them I propose, don't consider this a fantasy that belongs in a movie writer's desk nor as an attempt by New Age, New World Order persons to speculate. Consider the fact that students are not being taught how to program a calendar in programming classes and instead are shown to make images using programming. Does not the Bible, Hadith,Torah prohibit graven images? That is not to mean one should burst out in violence against engravers and their works. Does image engraving advance the survival of a species? That isn't to mean that one cannot create graven images as an atheist, pantheist. Consider that students are not being told that evolution is a religious cult as long as it is laid out as the only possible evolution (false-monotony): As it has already been shown the study of evolution is not exclusive to Darwinism. There is another evolution that runs parallel to general evolution and evolution of bio organisms and it's the Evolution of speech. General evolution embarks on all types of evolutionary ramifications of the genetic, lingual, grammatical, industrial, bio organic and chemical evolution (i.e. fossil record). Knowledge of science relies on facts. What matters in science is what is and was and not what can be although one may stipulate a hypothesis but it's mere speculation as long is it remains unproven.

One thing is for certain, evolution does not require that a population of ignorant people that agrees with it or not. Therefore, using any speculation is not about creating panic or questioning religious beliefs of others. Few people with questionable scruples have done this and it is not something that should be for the advancement of science but for personal entertainment. Take for example the common cough. Each year new forms of the common cold are being created and found in humans. Animals do not die of all the variants of common diseases that the human throat produces. Notwithstanding, some persons may believe that this sort of disease is one which animals are immune, as a human being and speaking for human beings, one should not argue contrarily to such an obvious observation since the survival of the species is at risk. This sort of evolutionary difference between humans and non humans is blatant considering that animals do not speak. Therefore, the evolution of speech is a necessary field in which generative anthropology may be akin and medicine may not benefit from since curing the common cold makes a doctor out of work.

Consider now, the field of medicine. It is a multi-billion dollar industry that has benefited immensely from evolution in the sense of persons who lack the mental capacity to disbelieve in miracles, such as supernatural beings, are prone to being perturbed to such a mental state that demands hospitalization. Such persons are a source of income for medical doctors and nurses as well as HMO's. So there's likely no interest in these organizations for the study of evolution of speech to continue in order to continue to make profits.

That is not to say that persons have not benefited from the medical and pharmaceutical sectors. The real culprit of diseases is either the kinds of things where people associate and speak/inhale because of the diversity of chemicals in the air or it is because there is a supernatural entity that wants persons' common cold to constantly evolutionize because of what they say. That is, analyzing throat/nasal area diseases from different countries, in Iran there is less calcification of the throat area than in the United States and the rest of the world [see pineal gland calcification studies]. Could it be because Iran is an independent nation with theocratic principles?

I could see such a contingency. I don't know about evolution freaks whom any thought of Godliness is implicit to making their babble for "evolution" as something prodigal. I know that it is very likely that evolution in the sense of abiogenesis may be true but until it is proven one should not make any negative statements concerning the existence of supernatural or even supranatural beings.

Uh, and Allah knows best.

[mastralvarado]

The following link might prove to be of use for persons who want to learn Arabic.

Why and How to Learn Arabic for Comprehension of the Quran - Nouman Ali Khan

[mastralvarado]

I've come across with another peculiarity.

The roman letter 'ae' which stands for "ash tree" happens to also omit the hyphen as does GA which so happens to be related to 'chapín's' cousin word ('wachupín') in its original form 'gachupín'. 'Gachupin' may be related to GA the acronym for Georgia as does 'gruzinim' stand for nickname Georgians/Georgia but not to be confused with the State of Georgia.

In the 1890's, calling someone a 'wachupín' in Mexico was heavily fined. It is a word that is no longer used except in its 'chapín' variant which is the case of Guatemalans.

Coincidently, 'wachapín' has almost exactly the same denotation as 'charam' which is a Hebrew word. Hence, whoever coined chapín/-chupín knew Hebrew well and also what it is that he or she was doing. If Hebrew is the original language of mankind, then any negative connotation would be perceived even if the person did not understand Hebrew. It would be therefore intentional to introduce such a neologism in order to cause lack of motivation in a person.

Under the disguise of the term Guatemalan, ergo, Wachapín was introduced during the colonial period around the "1700's" but without the wa nor ga.

And Allah knows best.

[mastralvarado]

In conclusion, taking the current trend in teaching/learning for young students in America and the high rate of addiction in the United States as a sign of an increasing tendency of malthusian misinformation wars, per se, I was thinking since it is a contradictory position to promote memoristic learning using the English and Spanish languages. Andres Mejia (Mejia, 2007) explains, “memoristic learning versus non-transcendental understanding are foes” in critical thinking. Quoting Mejia page 1 [1], “In the literature about pedagogy, “traditional education” has become the name for the beast that good sensible educators of all persuasions must fight against, and banish from their classrooms; the straw man whose burning will take away our pedagogical malaises. One of the main characteristics of this evil of traditional education has been referred to with expressions like “memoristic learning”, “memorisation”, “mechanical transfer of information”, and others.”

Considering now, English with over a million words and as the standard frank language for the rest of time, the longer we wait to implement a frank language that promotes understanding and true significant learning, as it has already been implemented by Mayan people in places such as Guatemala the more difficult it will be to implement peace. English among other non-semitic tongues considerably accelerate the non-proliferation of Semitic tongues since to an already knowledgeable person of Hebrew, Arabic, Mam, Queqchi, Tzu Tujil, Quiche, Aramaic, and so on and so forth, it is much easier to learn other languages as opposed to the other way around: a person who relies on memoristic learning does not catch on to these sorts of languages as easily.

Though irrelevant, the Chinese language speakers as do Japanese, do tend to use memoristic learning methods however visually, despite to say that the learning process goes on throughout their lifetime. The process of learning in any language which keeps growing is never complete; the speed and completeness of learning depends on what stage of one´s life one is in and the cognoscitive learning capacity; hence the precedence of significant learning at an early age.

If the gap in misunderstanding between Semitic and non-Semitic languages is never bridged the understatement that God is the most High will never be understood as the mistransliteration Allah as an example.

I’ve spoken to some teachers in Central America who all agree that Mayan students learn faster than non Mayan students on how to speak Spanish than students of the Mayan dialects. The case for Native Americans is unbeknownst to me yet I can see how these being tied to Semitic origins may also possess a similar capacity for learning these tongues.

So if anyone is in a contradiction, it is the secular teacher who wants to accelerate critical understanding through an evidently memoristic tongue. If anyone disagrees with someone other than himself on who´s the most high it is that person who is suspect of being an addicted consumer (of the language misnomer).
But don’t take my word for it and neither the UNESCO’s recent claim of 2,600 languages in extinction [citation needed]. Consider the fact that technology has improved the retention of the Mayan dialects in their speaker’s minds by bringing digital typology closer. If technology is being taken to new places where there are people who are still speaking ancient tongues, it should not be the cause for their extinction, unless the technology is not benefiting anyone but those who can afford it.
Ever since I published this article/thread there seems to have been an effort to mitigate its findings.

I just hope history does not repeat itself. The Spanish and English languages are built from the laicization of Muhammad (PBUH) and greek-latin tongues as well as the convolution of many other lexicons perversely introduced into their vocabularies[3].

I will rest assured that this is true considering the definition of laicization from the Catholic Encyclopedia [4].

The term laity signifies the aggregation of those Christians who do not form part of the clergy. Consequently the word lay does not strictly connote any idea of hostility towards the clergy or the Church much less towards religion. Laicization, therefore, considered etymologically, simply means the reducing of persons or things having an ecclesiastical character to a lay condition. But in recent times, especially in France, the word lay has assumed a decidedly anti-clerical and even anti-religious meaning, which has extended also to the derivatives laicize and laicization. This change seems to have originated in the struggles and controversies, at once religious and political, that have arisen in that country in connection with the educational question; teachers belonging to religious congregations (congréganistes) have been driven from the public schools; all religious instruction has been forbidden therein, and this new lay character (laïcité) of the public school has been declared to be essential and inviolable.

And Allah knows best.

[1] Mejia, Andres 2007. Understanding is necessary for critical thinking —but also for its declared foe of uncritical dogmatic thinking. Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia extracted on june 29 2009 from http://wwwprof.uniandes.edu.co/~jmej...l_thinking.pdf
[2] Nicholas, et. al., [citation needed]
[3] Ross, Kelly (2001), GWF Hegel. G.W.F. Hegel, Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Vol.? .Extracted on june 29 2009 from http://www.friesian.com/hegel.htm

[4] Bridge, J. (1911). Persecution. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved June 29, 2009 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11703a.htm

[mastralvarado]

I wanna say something to the people who voted against this poll.

You people didn't know that before language existed there was no such thing as church and state there was only church and language. So if you kept your mouth shut and memorized your prayers you would not run into any problems.

The rest of the world was tribal or pagan.

[BillyE]

I know next to nothing about language, history, or current politics.
My opinion is that of an uneducated lay person living in the USA.

Any harsh feelings I have towards Semites isn't because of a language barrier as I find foreign languages and expressions to rather interesting. In fact, my daughter recently returned from a trip to Europe and she went on about how fun it was to hear people talk differently. I think for the most part Americans are comfortable with other cultures, perhaps from a purely entertainment perspective, but certainly not threatened.

So the harsh feelings I've had to deal with have largely been the result of watching the news. Ever since I was able to waddle up to a TV and press my forehead against the screen I've seen nothing but destroyed buses, burning buildings, and mobs of angry brown people burning a flag I was taught to respect. For 40+ years I've watched people fight over land that would fetch about $3 an acre in Utah - nothing but angry rock throwing savages as far as the eye can see - so intolerant and hateful that if you draw a comic of the founder of their religion you can bet a dozen people will be killed over it.

Has the USA been fair in the middle east? No.
Has the new portrayed Semites fairly? No.
Have I been left with a skewed view of this conflict? Yes.

The point is that I don't see how knowing the language of the people who hate me is going to bridge any gaps. In fact, I think it helps that I don't know what their saying because I really don't like being called an infidel and a pig and that sort of rhetoric isn't really going to build bridges. I don't have to know what their saying to see the anger and the hatred and watching a fellow American get his head cut off on live TV pretty much bridges the language barrier.

The only reason I don't run your arse over when I see you cross the street is because Jesus said, "Love your enemies". What I've learned in His kingdom is that despite the name calling, the violence, the 40 years of bad news programming that I'm to allow Him to love these people through me. That changes my heart from the inside out and that is something a language course simply isn't going to do. Evidently those in the Kingdom of Jesus Christ are supposed to go out and bleed for the enemy - to give themselves for others.

I'm not good at it yet, but I really love the direction.

[BillyE]

I'm still totally boggled by the premise of the OP.
The middle east is packed full of Arabic speaking anti-Semites.

[KingsGambit]

I'm still totally boggled by the premise of the OP.
The middle east is packed full of Arabic speaking anti-Semites.

The OP lost me at "Hitler used German to persuade the masses against the Jews of Europe and the World."

[BillyE]

The OP lost me at "Hitler used German to persuade the masses against the Jews of Europe and the World."

That is factually correct, is it not?

[Jedidiah]

Well, they did speak German, after all.

[Epoetker]

The man proves the Onion's point: Islam is the best religion for people with Asperger's Syndrome:



Sadly, given that autism and Asperger's are much greater risks for women who put off having children till later in life, there's going to be a lot of Muslims like this in the Western future.

[KingsGambit]

If that were a serious risk, wouldn't this forum be more heavily Muslim-populated?