Tekton was funny/ Thanks for the laugh!

[Raphael]

What about all the links beavis posted about till bashing your site, you didn't delete those.

The rules are quite clear, no argument via weblink.

From what I read he did not bash you, it was a review of the thread.

Irrelevant, back to back posting is not allowed.

Did not k1112 or beavis post an exchange between you and a skeptic, you said something like you defended yourself 500 times. What was in k1112's closing statement that you want to hide?

JP has nothing to hide. We do not allow back to back posting no matter what the posters intent is, nor do we allow people to argue moderation in the threads. K1112 violated those rules. The posts have not been deleted, they have been moved to the Psychotherapy Room

What was in that post that you fear?

Are you this dense on purpose? Why should k1112 be allowed to ignore the rules?

Links are posted here all the time about this ministry,

Do you comprehend what the term argument via weblink is?

I'm sure beavis or K112 will simply do the same and follow the rules just like all the other links people post here.

They've ignored the rules so far.

Now will you stop arguing moderation in this thread? If you have an issue with the moderating decisions, go to the Psychotherapy room and start a thread with your complaints.

[fm93]

Hey, did anyone notice anything profound about what the evidence overwhelmingly suggests right now?

Think about it: THREE users/centers of consciousness (K1112, Beavis, Christian_re), but only ONE mind.



Hmm...perhaps trinities aren't impossible after all, eh, skeptics?

[fm93]

I can't wait for beavis or K1112 to post it. I want to read it again. It was great.

You enjoy looking at crap?

I read the posts, he wasn't resorting to continue an arguement, he closed out with a final statement that was really just a summary of the exchanges here and wanted neutral readers to see both sides and decide for themselves. That's what I saw.

Cool. I saw a brainless twit spew out yet another slobbery hairball of inane, illogical drivel.

Hurry beavis or K1112 with the off site link.

Don't count on it. With brains like theirs, the only link they'll send you would probably be a link of sausage.

PM it to me if you can.

Don't count on that either. They still don't understand the concepts of being refuted and being wrong.

[Beavis]

Fm what are you complaining about, you presented 80% of the responses, if you're so proud of your answers you should thank k1112 for displaying your responses to the neutral people he stated he was addressing. Both of us gave you credit for answering some of the problems presented, and don't say he didn't because you know he did.

Raphael , please, I pointed out a dozen times with links (that you people did not delete), that we know your tactics.

"Robert "No Links" Turkel" "Let's Make A Deal: The Question Dodge" "Denigration" "Arrogance" "Misrepresentation" "Making Up Answers"
http://the-anointed-one.com/tactics.htm

Knowing the final post is going to be read off site, rather than hide it, you place in the Psychotherapy room. Another tactic to try to influence people by trying to automatically create a 180 effect with his closing post. This is like the fighter who lost 11 rounds and raises his arms after the final bell, who is he trying to influence, the judges? Same thing here. I showed that post to my Aunt who is a graduate of ORU, who stated other than a few spelling errors, K112 closed effectively, she still believes but gave up Pentecostalism. Whenever you people have no responses these are the tactics you people use.

Raphael despite your tactic, people who live in glass houses should not throw stones. That thread revealed someone who wanted to kill babies simply because they born were German in the 1940's. To someone saying 42 kids attacked two bears. I enjoyed joking around with Holding myself. He thinks I hate him, but I don't.
Raphael lets talk about Psychotherapy, your profile says you are Pentecostal.
After I clicked this link, I see some of the people we are trying to talk sense into here.

• Edited by a Moderator •

Two can use that move my dear friend!

We even listened to Kent Hovind, I don't believe in YEC, but he made some good points.

Holding made some good points, he's smart, and so did FM,

As said, K1112 did not create a new argument or wish to continue one, he made a final statement and wanted people to see what we presented, and what the responses were. For neutral people to see both sides, and as he stated he felt, as I do, that we defeated Biblical inerrancy using the scriptures and (not probable answers) as the final authority.
K112 sent me the file, I tried to clean up some typos, I loaded the file, which is already on Google, so the whole world can see how you people answered the problems we presented!
The link is in my profile below. No Monday morning quarterbacking!
K112 said he will be laughing at Augusta next week, he will say hi to Tiger & Phil M for you all.

56 & out k

Moderated By: TolkienFan

That video's description and its title, contained swearing.

***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publically complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.

[Christian_re]

Thanks, Beavis.
They didn't lie down in front of you 2.
They fought a good fight.

[Raphael]

Raphael , please, I pointed out a dozen times with links (that you people did not delete), that we know your tactics.

If you consider expecting people to follow the rules a tactic well then yes. The majority of the Atheist/Agnostic membership of TWeb tend to consider the fact that TWeb enforces the same rules regardless of whether or not the person is a Christian to be one of the things that really stand out with TWeb.

"Robert "No Links" Turkel" "Let's Make A Deal: The Question Dodge" "Denigration" "Arrogance" "Misrepresentation" "Making Up Answers"
http://the-anointed-one.com/tactics.htm

You seem to think we've never encountered that? The author of that website is a TWeb member, by the name of Jimbo. His site is generally considered to be a great source of amusement.

Knowing the final post is going to be read off site, rather than hide it, you place in the Psychotherapy room.

Nope. Standard practise with posts that are arguing with moderation in the Thread. As has been stated repeatedly, TWeb has a specific place for dealing with complaints, this isn't it.

Raphael despite your tactic, people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

And people who live in cardboard boxes shouldn't be playing with matches.

That thread revealed someone who wanted to kill babies simply because they born were German in the 1940's.

Yeah, it's amazing what you can do by ignoring context?

To someone saying 42 kids attacked two bears. I enjoyed joking around with Holding myself.

Again, it's amazing what you can do when you mis understand things. 42Kids? Hmm how would you like to be menaced by a street gang of nearly 50 guys in their mid to late teens threatening you?

He thinks I hate him, but I don't.

No, he thinks you have an ID-ten-T error.

Raphael lets talk about Psychotherapy, your profile says you are Pentecostal.

And?

After I clicked this link, I see some of the people we are trying to talk sense into here.

Funny a youtube video mocking pentecostals with what some pentecostals get up to. How does that address anything to do with the Theological basis for our beliefs?

Two can use that move my dear friend!

Apparantly only one can because I fail to see what you were trying.

We even listened to Kent Hovind, I don't believe in YEC, but he made some good points.

Kent Hovind is a crackpot who has done more damage to the credibility of YEC than Dawkins ever has. The man is a fraud who belongs in the jail he is currently in.

Holding made some good points, he's smart, and so did FM,

As said, K1112 did not create a new argument or wish to continue one, he made a final statement and wanted people to see what we presented, and what the responses were. For neutral people to see both sides, and as he stated he felt, as I do, that we defeated Biblical inerrancy using the scriptures and (not probable answers) as the final authority.

And as I said, I don't care if his arguments were good or bad, correct or incorrects, that doesn't give him the right to ignore the rules about back to back posting like that. Had JP or anyone else participating in this thread done the same, they two would have been modded.

K112 sent me the file, I tried to clean up some typos, I loaded the file, which is already on Google, so the whole world can see how you people answered the problems we presented!

Good for you

The link is in my profile below. No Monday morning quarterbacking!

And that is the correct way to do it.

[Andius]

Just wait for the wah wah wah waaaahs of Beavis going.

Waaaaaaaahhh, TWeb unfair!!
Waaaaaaaaaahhh, they nitpick for swear words!!
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh, TWeb is da debeeeel!! Waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!!!

[Beavis]

Raphael is this your church?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b8mls0q-4U

[jpholding]

Beavis, is this your house?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7EEC3ctQro

[Beavis]

Oh mista tukey dat funney, butt u kan doe bedder dan dat!
May_b dose vultchures beee wons gowe armagedden?
u gowe 2 mista raphaelz churzh ??
kan eye gowe 2 churzh wit u ande mista rapheal ande u2?

[jpholding]

Oh mista tukey dat funney, butt u kan doe bedder dan dat!

Not really, because that's the best that can be said of you in reality.

Is this you, K112, and Christian_re doing research into Biblical scholarship?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgdSl8UjfwE

[Beavis]

Butt eye wanna gowe 2 churzh wit U mista tukey!
U raphel gowe with beevis, eye wnna gowe to churzh dat misata Paul s-AAy orrdaly worzhip

dis orrdaly wership? Mista Paul bee pleazed?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SgByE0pX1M


bevis wanna gowe wih mista tukey!

[jpholding]

dis orrdaly wership? Mista Paul bee pleazed?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SgByE0pX1M

I think those guys are as much idiots as you are, Butthead!

Is this you at your job?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1DBuFgt_Ug

[Beavis]

Y U mache funn ov meye friendz? Dat Monkee iz God's kreateshion!
C God luv dat Monkee , iz God dat kreate monnkkee, reel God luv monkkee, bade yahweh orrda kille animalz, anye 1 dat breethes? jasu-wah anne smmuall kile animalz dat yahhway bade boye, bade bade mista tukey!
R yahwayy all-la firendz, dey luv 2 kille!
khemosh ctill wanna C U, khemosh beet Yahwaye dat day, Yahwaye katch betten bye khemosh?
"When the kings of Israel and Judah were wining their invasion against the Moabites, the Moabite king made a burnt offering of his oldest son. A great wrath came upon Israel and they had to withdraw. In effect, the Moabite god, Chemosh, defeated Yahweh. 26When the king of Moab saw that the battle was going against him, he took with him seven hundred swordsmen to break through, opposite the king of Edom; but they could not.
27Then he took his eldest son who was to reign in his stead, and offered him for a burnt offering upon the wall. And there came great wrath upon Israel; and they withdrew from him and returned to their own land. (2 Kings. 3:26-27)"
http://www.usbible.com/Sacrifice/sacrifice_israel.htm


may-B khemosh beet upe all-la 2?

mIsata tukey takee bevis 2 churzh?

[jpholding]

Y U mache funn ov meye friendz? Dat Monkee iz God's kreateshion!

Is your second cousin too.

khemosh ctill wanna C U, khemosh beet Yahwaye dat day, yahway katch betten bye khemosh?

I only answered that crap how many times? Is this you posing objections?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbRA5Z6anc0

mIsata tukey takee bevis 2 churzh?

I'll ask if they need a doorstop.