Thread: The nature of fear
-
August 6th 2009, 02:17 AM #1
The nature of fear
what is fear? I would say the fear is an instinctual reaction to the unknown, incomprehensible or to that which lies outside ability to understand. This reaction can be controlled to some extent by sheer force of will and one's willingness to accept the strange, often confusing world in which we live. However, no matter how hard you try, you can never escape that initial gut reaction.
Why is that? Where does it come from? What part of our psyche is responsible? Thoughts?
-
August 6th 2009, 09:25 AM #2
Re: The nature of fear
I think that covers a lot of it but I would also add that fear arises when we encounter certain things outside of our control as well, even when we understand those things. For instance I'm afraid of a criminal holding a gun to my head. I understand how it all works but I'm not in control. Or a car careening across the double yellow lines toward me.
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
The following tWebber says Amen to Pilgrim for this useful Post:
-
August 6th 2009, 01:54 PM #3
Re: The nature of fear
you're right Pilgrim, I didn't think of the whole control issue! dang, I thought I had it well thought out!
-
August 6th 2009, 02:50 PM #4
Re: The nature of fear
I was actually thinking about this recently and pretty much came to the same conclusion: that fear is a coin and the two sides are lack of control and the unknown.
Here's the million dollars question: what's the edge?
*insert x files music*"Years ago, I mean decades ago, I read a quote about politicians performing quid pro quo favors for campaign cash, and whether or not we could prove it. The guy who was quoted opined that it was difficult to determine. He noted that in many cases, the payoff might not take the form of votes on legislative action -- those might be detectable, and so are avoided -- but could take subtler forms, like the question that is never asked at a hearing.
The media's doing a terrific job of not asking questions it doesn't want to know the answer to. It doesn't ask these questions in bulk, and the great volume of questions it doesn't ask makes it cheap to not ask questions.
And it passes these savings on to you, the customer." Ace
-
August 6th 2009, 02:52 PM #5
Re: The nature of fear
Hmmm....the edge would be mental acuity. The more critical you are, the more of a problem solver you are, the less impact fear has on you. What do you think?
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
August 6th 2009, 04:24 PM #6
Re: The nature of fear
Really? I wouldn't have thought of that. In fact, I'd think stupidity would be more beneficial since you're less likely to accurately take in the world and assume you're still in control/know what's happening even when you don't.
"Years ago, I mean decades ago, I read a quote about politicians performing quid pro quo favors for campaign cash, and whether or not we could prove it. The guy who was quoted opined that it was difficult to determine. He noted that in many cases, the payoff might not take the form of votes on legislative action -- those might be detectable, and so are avoided -- but could take subtler forms, like the question that is never asked at a hearing.
The media's doing a terrific job of not asking questions it doesn't want to know the answer to. It doesn't ask these questions in bulk, and the great volume of questions it doesn't ask makes it cheap to not ask questions.
And it passes these savings on to you, the customer." Ace
-
August 8th 2009, 01:05 PM #7
Re: The nature of fear
I will agree that fear is an instinctual reaction to the unknown, but I disagree that that which is feared is incomprehensible or lies outside the ability to understand.
I will say that this reaction can be controlled by one's willingness to accept the fallacy that some things are "incomprehensible."
I will also say that it is natural and a blessing that we cannot escape the initial gut reaction, but it is pathetic ignorance when one is content to remain in such a state.
Why? Where? What?
Mortality; Ideology."Civil Rights didn't write your resume, but made somebody read your resume." ~ Rev. Al Sharpton
-
August 9th 2009, 07:40 AM #8
Re: The nature of fear
ZT,
i agree somewhat with you. i say somewhat because some things must remain incomprehensible. Take God, for example. If God were comprehensible, then God would cease to be God. The whole concept of God requires mystery, some degree of unknowability. "the beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord"
DE,
I'd tend to agree with you. ignorance is bliss. if I could go back in time, I'd seriously cosider unlearning some of the things I know, simply because it makes me more aware of the things I don't know.
the edge, at least for me, is my God. I.m certain of my place in the hereafter, my soul is spoken for. consequently, I have nothing to fear from man. the worst man can do is kill my body. bu God can take my body AND soul, if He's decided to save me, what can man do?
I've been trying to help my wife work through some of her fears, but have been failing miserably. I thought that if I could better grasp the nature of fear, I might be able to be more effective.
-
July 26th 2011, 11:16 AM #9
Re: The nature of fear
I don't think it has much to do with the unknown. I mean, you can be afraid of the unknown, but not everything unknown creates fear (how much cereal is left in my box?).
I think it has more to do with harm and damage than anything. The lack of control thing plays a part because that's the only time you'd let yourself be harmed: if you had enough control to prevent it.
But I think its ultimately a desire to avoid damage.
-
July 26th 2011, 03:14 PM #10
Re: The nature of fear
Hello Zeta and welcome to TWeb. I think it would help if you checked the date of the last post in a thread before you make a post unless you're intending to resurrect dead threads.
Anyway, on topic, I think fear is made up of both experiencing fear and acting fearfully. We can't control what we feel, but we can reduce why we feel it. We can also control how we act when feeling fearful, ranging from courage to cowardice.
-
July 29th 2011, 12:42 AM #11
Re: The nature of fear
Who cares when the last post was?
-
July 29th 2011, 02:47 PM #12
Re: The nature of fear
The main reason is that there could be people who posted in the thread who are no longer active in this forum who won't see or reply to your post. In this instance, I think the person who made the opening post, ASquared, is inactive, and I'm pretty sure Zero Tolerance isn't either, while Darth Executor and Pilgrim are both still regulars. Other people often don't want to start in the middle of a conversation in case they say something that has already been discussed and can't be bothered to read through all of the old posts before they get to yours, especially when dead threads have multiple pages, so it is often better to start a fresh thread, even on the same topic, and than to resurrect and old one.
-
July 29th 2011, 10:14 PM #13
-
July 31st 2011, 01:20 AM #14
Re: The nature of fear
I think some leeway should be given to people whose resurrection of dead threads resurrects the entire subforum.
Fear is, at bottom, the remembrance of the failure to control a situation to your own advantage in the past. And that is why the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, though not its end.
Though in times of great and overwhelming fear, the simple and innocent will be sought after most of all. Or drugs that can regress one temporarily to a simple and innocent state.In reaction to Richwine Affair, all right-thinking people are quick to proclaim that they don’t believe in a genetic basis for IQ. They’re much less quick to explain – with any sort of precision – what they actually do believe in. At best, we’re treated to some hand-waving paired with the phrase “social construct.”.
-Foseti
-
July 31st 2011, 04:39 AM #15
Re: The nature of fear
I'd disagree. I've never been in a situation where getting food was out of my control and I went hungry, but I've still got a fear of starving to death. I've never been in a situation where one of my limbs was threatened, but I've got a fear of dismemberment
Similar Threads
-
The LDS view of the nature of man verses the nature of God
By John Goddard in forum LDS - MormonismReplies: 15Last Post: March 8th 2009, 03:38 PM -
Nature and the Fall or Nature and the Creator
By gotAnswers in forum Christianity 201Replies: 5Last Post: January 3rd 2007, 01:18 PM -
Fear Not!
By D.R.R. in forum The PulpitReplies: 0Last Post: May 24th 2004, 11:18 AM -
To Fear or Not to Fear
By Trout in forum RegistrationReplies: 10Last Post: February 15th 2004, 08:28 PM















































































Quote



Revelation was written during...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in Eschatology 201