-
November 6th 2003, 10:31 PM #1
Talking Hairdos and the Ten Commandments: Chuck Colson on the late Neil Postman
Colson makes a good point about the importance of language and literacy for Christianity, how God reveals Himself through the propositions of Scripture and how we communicate linguistically through prayer. The current media emphasis on fast moving images and emotions is more akin to New Age pantheism -- Soc.
Talking Hairdos and the Ten Commandments
Chuck Colson
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/c...20031028.shtml
October 28, 2003
A few weeks ago, one of the most astute media critics of our age, Neil Postman, died at the age of 72. In remembering the long-time New York University professor, the press described Postman’s warnings about the dangers of mass communication.
In his devastating critique of television, titled Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman declared that television turns even the most tragic news into mere entertainment, delivered by “talking hairdos.”
Postman’s book was reviewed in all the right places, and it has been around for some time—but not once did we learn where Postman got his ideas. It turns out he got them from the Bible.
Postman’s thesis is that different media encourage different ways of thinking. The printed word requires sustained attention, logical analysis, and an active ima gination. But television, with its fast-moving images, encourages a short attention span, disjointed thinking, and purely emotional responses.
Postman says he first discovered the connection between media and thinking in the Bible when, as a young man, he was struck by the Old Testament words: “You shall not make for yourself a graven image.” Postman says he realized that the idea of a universal deity cannot be expressed in images, but only in words.
As he put it, “The God of the Jews was to exist in the Word and through the Word, an unprecedented conception requiring the highest order of abstract thinking.” This is the God Christians worship today—a God known principally through His Word and incarnate.
Many religions have a scripture, of course. Yet most teach that the way to contact the divine is through mystical visions, emotional experiences, or Eastern-style meditation. Judaic Christianity insists on the primacy of language.
Gene Edward Veith, in his book Reading Between the Lines, explains why: The heart of our religion is a relationship with God—and relationships thrive on communication. We can’t know people intimately by merely being in their presence, according to Veith. It takes conversation to share thoughts and personalities.
Christians are meant to have an ongoing conversation with God. He addresses us in the language of Scripture, and we address Him through the language of prayer.
This emphasis on the Word has had a deep impact on Western culture. Reading was once confined to the elite. But it was the Reformation that first aimed at universal literacy, so that the Bible could be read by every person.
Today’s missionaries are similarly concerned with literacy. In nonliterate societies, they develop a written form of the native language and teach people to read the Bible.
They can then go on, of course, to read about anything—sanitation, health care, democracy—things that often transform their culture, much as the Reformation transformed Western culture.
Here in the West we are in danger of coming full circle: The visual media may ultimately undermine literacy. If that happens, can biblical faith still flourish?
Neil Postman’s writings remind Christians of the dangers of television. We need to learn when to turn it off lest we lose our historical reputation as the “people of the book.”
-
November 8th 2003, 12:33 AM #2
I noticed that you put a picture in your post. Ah, the irony!
-
November 8th 2003, 09:44 AM #3Socrates:
. . . . . The current media emphasis on fast moving images and emotions is more akin to New Age pantheism -- Soc.Today @ 04:33 AM post located here
Eli_Cash:
I noticed that you put a picture in your post. Ah, the irony!
הִנֵּה מַה־טּוֹב וּמַה־נָּעִים שֶׁבֶת אַחִים גַּם־יָחַד
-
January 16th 2004, 10:49 AM #4
I read that article too and thought it was really good.
Quote:
Postman’s thesis is that different media encourage different ways of thinking. The printed word requires sustained attention, logical analysis, and an active ima gination. But television, with its fast-moving images, encourages a short attention span, disjointed thinking, and purely emotional responses.
Postman says he first discovered the connection between media and thinking in the Bible when, as a young man, he was struck by the Old Testament words: “You shall not make for yourself a graven image.” Postman says he realized that the idea of a universal deity cannot be expressed in images, but only in words.
End Quote...
There is no question in my mind that different media encourage different modes of thinking. He also wrote something about "Informing ourselves to death," which I agreed with. I think I am also twebbing myself to death.
Similar Threads
-
Freedom of Speech victory for Joe Vento - 2 years late, but better late than never
By Conductor42 in forum Civics 101Replies: 4Last Post: March 22nd 2008, 12:39 AM -
Colson to NY Times: Gay Marriage Has Never Been a Constitutional Right
By Socrates in forum Civics 101Replies: 45Last Post: March 5th 2004, 08:21 PM -
Two Cities: Augustine’s City of God (Chuck Colson on citizenship)
By Socrates in forum Christianity 201Replies: 3Last Post: February 6th 2004, 07:37 PM -
Three Died That Day -- Chuck Colson
By Socrates in forum Study RoomReplies: 0Last Post: November 30th 2003, 11:27 PM -
Chuck Colson: Terrorism, War, and Evil--Reflections on 11 September
By Socrates in forum Civics 101Replies: 2Last Post: September 25th 2003, 06:22 AM















































































Quote

Does Honesty require Openness?
Today, 12:32 PM in Philosophy 201