Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Problems with General Relativity Theory.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostYou know he's not going to comply, so why bother?"[Mathematics] is the revealer of every genuine truth, for it knows every hidden secret, and bears the key to every subtlety of letters; whoever, then, has the effrontery to pursue physics while neglecting mathematics should know from the start he will never make his entry through the portals of wisdom."
--Thomas Bradwardine, De Continuo (c. 1325)
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnMartin View PostDoes someone want me to post another point on GR?"[Mathematics] is the revealer of every genuine truth, for it knows every hidden secret, and bears the key to every subtlety of letters; whoever, then, has the effrontery to pursue physics while neglecting mathematics should know from the start he will never make his entry through the portals of wisdom."
--Thomas Bradwardine, De Continuo (c. 1325)
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnMartin View PostProblem 1 continued
GR is silent on the value of the Hubble constant, which infers GR is a weak theory.
GR has nothing to say about the origin or cause of dark matter or dark energy. GR is either weak, or may only infer a maths model of the universe that does not support the requirements of DM and DE in the observed universe. In short the DM and DE issue may indicate GR is not a realist model of the universe.
Well, i guess you can, but it would be pointless and silly.
(Also, it's "implies", not "infers". )"Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trolling."
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheLurch View PostQuantum mechanics is silent on the value of the Hubble constant and the nature of dark matter/energy. So's the standard model. So's evolution, for that matter. None of these are weak theories. You just can't expect theories to handle things that aren't part of what they were developed to explain.
But given JM's proclivity for finding "Problem"s, it wouldn't surprise me at all if he objected to Relativity because it is silent on Hardy-Weinberg ratios and Moore's Law.Jorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.
MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.
seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...
Comment
Comment