MAJOR derail from Screwball Thread

[Darth Ovious]

Most of these nutters are.



(I'm one of the few INFP's around)

I can't remember what I was again.

[Rational Gaze]

I'm ISTJ.

[bridgeforsale]

Yankee,

He doesn't have serious anger management issues. This is his way of trying to rile you up. He's not angry at you. He considers you entertainment. Pure and simple.

no, you're wrong (my advice, choose leaders whose parents weren't related before they got married)

Moreover, my new retarded friend (your fearless leader) still ignores my debate challenges. Once again, if I'm going to debate anyone (and waste my time on this religious nonsense) I want to make it worth my while.

I will make Holding look like the blithering idiot he is.

[DoomRater]

Diagnosing people on the internet sure is getting popular these days...!

Wonder when people will start understanding that psychologically diagnosing people on the internet is about the stupidest thing you can do?

[Stax]

no, you're wrong (my advice, choose leaders whose parents weren't related before they got married)

Moreover, my new retarded friend (your fearless leader) still ignores my debate challenges. Once again, if I'm going to debate anyone (and waste my time on this religious nonsense) I want to make it worth my while.

How has he ignored your challenges? He's refuted your points and challenged YOU.

Moroever, you missed a capital 'N' in your first sentence, a full stop at the end of that sentence. I also don't think that that use of brackets there is stricly necessary; a hypen would be better.

Good day.

[Rational Gaze]

From the way Poodle Boy keep projecting, I'd say he has a narcissistic paranoid anti-social behaviour disorder and a psycho/socialpath.

I'm not a professional psychologist, but this is the internet, so that instantly qualifies me.

[LilPunkishOfTerror]

ooh yeah I'll debate you Yankee! Bet he ignores that

[Darth Ovious]

no, you're wrong (my advice, choose leaders whose parents weren't related before they got married)

Moreover, my new retarded friend (your fearless leader) still ignores my debate challenges. Once again, if I'm going to debate anyone (and waste my time on this religious nonsense) I want to make it worth my while.

I will make Holding look like the blithering idiot he is.

I think I would know better than you.

He has already said he'd debate you. He wants a specific topic, one that goes into details. He didn't spend all his time learning about Christianity so he could get into a general argument with someone.

Here's a clue. Challenge JP on whether the resurrection is a fact or myth. That'll do for a start and you can use whatever supernatural parallels if you wish.

[Challenger Grim]

Re:Darth Executor

While your post does make some sense on a theistic view of morality, I must confess that I have some issues with it.

To put it simply, the idea that subjective morality enforced with the absolute power of God makes it objective just doesn't fit, because at the very root of things, it's still merely God's opinion.He may have enforced them with absolute force, but at its root, it still is his opinion.Merely another code to me, like the one Hammurabi lay down.

And from that perspective, the laws of physics, math, logic, etc are just "merely God's opinion".

If God's involved, what makes morality different from those?

You would be well served by reading this.
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/10/o...and-right.html

And as two commentators pointed out:

Yes, but the beauty of Christianity is that God did "get in the game" so to speak and play by His own rules as Jesus (thus, "fulfilling the law"). Or to use your example, if a sitting commissioner did join a team as a player, he could get penalized for pass interference.

Precisely. God is constrained in very much the same way that the commissioner - or, if you prefer a more accurate analogy, an owner - would be constrained by the rules in the event he ever chose to enter the field as a player-commissioner. While the player-commissioner easily could get away with violating the rules by ordering the referees to permit him to play however he pleased, that would violate the integrity of the game and destroy its purpose.

So, what we can conclude from this is that God values the integrity of the earthly game.

If God believes in the rules, what could be more real?

(also, pertinent to ongoing discussions here:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6905259.ece
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/11/d...disciples.html)

[Darth Executor]

Hey! I'm an INTJ too! Nice to meet an INTx round here

Dude, this area's like 90% intx. mostly intjs and a handful of far superior INTPs like me.

[Darth Executor]

What A retard. I have absolutely no idea how anyone could respect a blithering idiot like you. My advice, seek psycho therapy before it's too late (and you share the fate of the Muslim Fort Hood shooter), because you have serious anger management issues. I can see you trying to blow up an abortion clinic or kill an abortion doctor one of these days.

Adios TARD!

Oh noes, jp called me names on the Internet! He must be planning an abortion clinic bombing next!

What a dumbass.

[Darth Ovious]

Oh noes, jp called me names on the Internet! He must be planning an abortion clinic bombing next!

What a dumbass.

yep, that's a slippery slope argument right there. Also it's character assassination. Two more fallacies to put onto the pile.

[Darth Executor]

Moreover, my new retarded friend (your fearless leader) still ignores my debate challenges.

Actually, stupid, he didn't "ignore your debate challenges", he said he refuses to debate vague, broad subjects and requested something more specific. Here, I'll make it easy for you: "Did Jesus rise from the dead". That's a nice, specific subject you can debate and which falls well within his area of specialization as well as being the most important subject on the matter of Christianity's validity that you could discuss.

[Darth Executor]

yep, that's a slippery slope argument right there. Also it's character assassination. Two more fallacies to put onto the pile.

It's not even an argument, it's just pure, refined weapons grade stupid that could turn anyone directly exposed to it into ash.

[LilPunkishOfTerror]

That explains the quality of his arguments, then.