Humans Caused Extinction of Australia’s Prehistoric Giant Animals

[shunyadragon]

Ut is becoming more apparent that humans are more responsible for the extinction of the large mammals.

[mossrose]

Evolution at it's finest!

[Cow Poke]

Evolution at it's finest!

Perhaps Shuny would prefer that the 'Prehistoric Giant Animals' had caused the extinction of humans.

[mossrose]

Perhaps Shuny would prefer that the 'Prehistoric Giant Animals' had caused the extinction of humans.

Most evolutionists probably prefer that. Animals are always more valuable than humans, don'tcha know?

But, survival of the fittest!

[Tassman]

Evolution at it's finest!

Evolution, yes. Value judgements about the functioning of nature are irrelevant.

[rogue06]

Most evolutionists probably prefer that. Animals are always more valuable than humans, don'tcha know?

But, survival of the fittest!

facepalm3.gif

As silly as saying that Christians prefer it because we believe all humans are sinners.

And survival of the fittest deals with who leaves the most offspring

[hansgeorg]

50,000 years ago - carbon dated?

If so, this would be remains from the Flood of Noah.

[shunyadragon]

50,000 years ago - carbon dated?

Not likely. The dating is likely by K-Ar for the bones, and dating strata where the bones were found, comparing this with dating the related coastal strata.

If so, this would be remains from the Flood of Noah.

No objective physical evidence for the flood. The strata in the sediment cores is too uniform and fine textured to caused by a flood. Some of the layers are layers of fine textured loess (wind blown silt). Many fine textured deposits are varved clay deposits of ancient lakes with seasonal annual deposits we can observe forming today.

[Sparko]

36F727AD00000578-0-image-a-77_1470576604643.jpg


You're welcome, mate!

Put another Monsterroo on the barby!

[hansgeorg]

The strata in the sediment cores is too uniform and fine textured to caused by a flood. Some of the layers are layers of fine textured loess (wind blown silt). Many fine textured deposits are varved clay deposits of ancient lakes with seasonal annual deposits we can observe forming today.

OK, and where do you get it from that the fine texture of loess cannot have been there during Flood?

[hansgeorg]

Not likely. The dating is likely by K-Ar for the bones, and dating strata where the bones were found, comparing this with dating the related coastal strata.

I checked:

http://www.sci-news.com/paleontology...rds-03267.html

Now, 20,000 to 50,000 carbon years (and with or without U-Pb/Th-Pb carbon seems to be 50,000) is the carbon range for Flood, according to creationists.

Other check:

The two specimens, Simosthenurus occidentalis and Protemnodon anak, have been radiocarbon dated to approximately 45,000 years ago.

http://www.sci-news.com/genetics/sci...aby-02403.html

[mossrose]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20519[/ATTACH]

As silly as saying that Christians prefer it because we believe all humans are sinners.

And survival of the fittest deals with who leaves the most offspring

You know I'm being facetious, right?

And, frankly, who cares that there are no longer 1000 pound roos bouncing about? Are we really supposed to feel ashamed for something that supposedly happened 50,000 years ago?

[Sparko]

You know I'm being facetious, right?

And, frankly, who cares that there are no longer 1000 pound roos bouncing about? Are we really supposed to feel ashamed for something that supposedly happened 50,000 years ago?

Hey for once they can't blame the white folks.

[mossrose]

Hey for once they can't blame the white folks.

Wanna bet?

[TheLurch]

And, frankly, who cares that there are no longer 1000 pound roos bouncing about? Are we really supposed to feel ashamed for something that supposedly happened 50,000 years ago?

I don't feel ashamed, just disappointed i'll never get to see them.

I'm more disappointed about the moas, though - just a few hundred years off.