Another Last Sinner Wins Thread

[FreezBee]

No to what?

[Thersites]

To the yes.

[FreezBee]

What yes? Your own?

[Thersites]

What yes? Your own?

Yes, which was to my no.

[FreezBee]

Exhibit A:

Yes and no

Exhibit B:

No to what?

Exhibit C:

To the yes.

Exhibit D:

What yes? Your own?

Exhibit E:

Yes, which was to my no.

Let's try to get this straightened out, shall we?

*** takes Exhibit A in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit A you said "Yes and no".

*** puts down Exhibit A ***
*** takes Exhibit B in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit B, you were ansked about what the "no" was referring to.
The "no" here being the "no" in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit B ***
*** takes Exhibit C in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
And, according to Exhibit C, you answered that the "no" was to the "yes".

*** puts down Exhibit C ***
*** takes Exhibit D in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit D, you were asked what "yes" you were referring to, in particular, if it was your own "yes" as in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit D ***
*** takes Exhibit E in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
Accordinf to Exhibit E you answered affirmative; that is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in exhibit A. That is, you said "no" to your own "yes". In exhibit E you the proceed with the words "which was to my no". That is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in Exhibit A, which was to your "no" in Exhibit A.

So, the "yes" confiems the "no" which denies the "yes".

In short, your sentence makes no sense!


What verdict will the jury reach?

[Thersites]

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:

Exhibit C:

Exhibit D:

Exhibit E:

Let's try to get this straightened out, shall we?

*** takes Exhibit A in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit A you said "Yes and no".

*** puts down Exhibit A ***
*** takes Exhibit B in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit B, you were ansked about what the "no" was referring to.
The "no" here being the "no" in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit B ***
*** takes Exhibit C in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
And, according to Exhibit C, you answered that the "no" was to the "yes".

*** puts down Exhibit C ***
*** takes Exhibit D in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit D, you were asked what "yes" you were referring to, in particular, if it was your own "yes" as in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit D ***
*** takes Exhibit E in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
Accordinf to Exhibit E you answered affirmative; that is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in exhibit A. That is, you said "no" to your own "yes". In exhibit E you the proceed with the words "which was to my no". That is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in Exhibit A, which was to your "no" in Exhibit A.

So, the "yes" confiems the "no" which denies the "yes".

In short, your sentence makes no sense!


What verdict will the jury reach?

This statement is false.

[MooseOnTheLoose]

My associating orphans with BBQ sauce might be considered sinful.

[FreezBee]

My associating orphans with BBQ sauce might be considered sinful.

, just wrong

[FreezBee]

This statement is false.

That statement is true

[Jellibean]

me, too . . .

[princesa]

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:

Exhibit C:

Exhibit D:

Exhibit E:

Let's try to get this straightened out, shall we?

*** takes Exhibit A in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit A you said "Yes and no".

*** puts down Exhibit A ***
*** takes Exhibit B in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit B, you were ansked about what the "no" was referring to.
The "no" here being the "no" in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit B ***
*** takes Exhibit C in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
And, according to Exhibit C, you answered that the "no" was to the "yes".

*** puts down Exhibit C ***
*** takes Exhibit D in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
According to Exhibit D, you were asked what "yes" you were referring to, in particular, if it was your own "yes" as in Exhibit A.

*** puts down Exhibit D ***
*** takes Exhibit E in his hands turning it towards the jury ***
Accordinf to Exhibit E you answered affirmative; that is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in exhibit A. That is, you said "no" to your own "yes". In exhibit E you the proceed with the words "which was to my no". That is, your "no" in Exhibit A was to your "yes" in Exhibit A, which was to your "no" in Exhibit A.

So, the "yes" confiems the "no" which denies the "yes".

In short, your sentence makes no sense!


What verdict will the jury reach?

"Buennisimo! bravo!! bravo!!" said the crazy lady in the back of the courtroom

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, princesa will now take the stand with a little history that might help in the labeling process

**taps mic**

it all started when i was little. i just loved those little picture bible books!

collective groans heard in the audience

Fine! I grew up going to catholic church b/c it was the nearest one. My mom stopped taking us when we were around 11. She hasn't gone in years and has the strongest faith of anyone i've ever known (not just saying that 'cause she's my mum) she lives it . I've only known the catholic faith and look forward to going to churches of other denominations. If i were to say I was Catholic I'm afraid i wouldn't be a very good one. But! the good news is that i am a Christian.
[most days]

[FreezBee]

"Buennisimo! bravo!! bravo!!" said the crazy lady in the back of the courtroom

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, princesa will now take the stand with a little history that might help in the labeling process

**taps mic**

it all started when i was little. i just loved those little picture bible books!

collective groans heard in the audience

Fine! I grew up going to catholic church b/c it was the nearest one. My mom stopped taking us when we were around 11. She hasn't gone in years and has the strongest faith of anyone i've ever known (not just saying that 'cause she's my mum) she lives it . I've only known the catholic faith and look forward to going to churches of other denominations. If i were to say I was Catholic I'm afraid i wouldn't be a very good one. But! the good news is that i am a Christian.
[most days]

Ok, with this new evidence provided by Ms. princesa there appears to be some evidence that Ms. princesa frequents churches of the Catholic persuation (why did it take me more than a minute to have the word "persuation" overshadow "perversion" in my mind?) and therefore misses the Sunday mass, when she doesn't frequent the church at Sundays.

The question remaining is: does frequenting a Catholic church at Saturday qualify as sufficient absolvent for not doing it on Sundays?


And, is it really a death sin to miss mass?

Stay tuned, the next episode will come to a thetre near you before you even know it!

[MooseOnTheLoose]

In Catholicism everything is a sin.

[princesa]

i'd like to take this opportunity to announce that i, princesa, black fonted one of tweb, have not sinned today, neither in action, nor in thought, ..so let it be known, so let it be read.

[FreezBee]

i'd like to take this opportunity to announce that i, princesa, black fonted one of tweb, have not sinned today, neither in action, nor in thought, ..so let it be known, so let it be read.

May we all learn from your lucid example