Who will be next to fall off the Trump titanic?

[Starlight]

Sessions is a competent good Attorney General

He's increasing civil asset forfeiture. That's strike one, he's out in my books. Of all the corrupt and barbarous practices in the US, civil asset forfeiture has to be pretty much at the top of the list - it's the world's most a blatant violation of "innocent until proven guilty" and turns cops into highway robbers.

Not to mention, he's nutty about cracking down on marijuana. He's an absolute hypocrite on 'states rights': He loves it when 'states rights' allows for racism, and hates it when 'states rights' allow people to treat their illnesses with painkilling marijuana.

And his history of racism and cracking down on black voters is despicable.

And he seems to have committed perjury multiple times when asked about his meetings with Russians. At this point I could believe that Sergey Kislyak carried one of those forgetfulness devices off Men In Black... no one ever seems to remember meeting with the Russian Ambassador and discussing lifting sanctions on Russia with him.

As best I can tell, Jeff Sessions is just an all-around bad guy with zero redeeming features. He should be in prison for perjury.

[firstfloor]

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...torney-general

[Charles]

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...torney-general

Thanks. It was a very important article providing relevant knowledge. Sometimes - especially right now - so many absurd things are going on that rather absurd stories get covered up by even more absurd stories.

[Bill the Cat]

Why is that abhorrent?

He argued against redefining what a "bona fide" relationship was. The SCOTUS overruled him. Big deal.

He is laying the groundwork to crack down on the millions of people who use recreational marijuana in states where it is now legal.

Good. Freakin pot heads...

He has planned a crackdown on leakers and whistleblowers,

Only in relation to matters of national security and classified information, as he should do.

while also refusing to rule out prosecuting news organizations directly for doing their job.

It is not the job of news organizations to propagate illegally obtained classified information. How would you feel if the news media published your SSN as part of "just doing their job"?

He plans on essentially dismantling the vital civil rights division at the justice department and giving local police officers a free hand to continue to discriminate against African Americans.

BS-meter.jpg

He wants to reverse the Obama-era policy on mandatory minimum sentences and press for still longer terms,

Good. Consequences for crime should suck donkey.

whose impact is so extreme they are rightly seen as racist.

BS-meter.jpg

Sessions has rejected scientific findings about improving the forensic evidence process that has led to countless innocent people being thrown in prison.

This I gotta see...

The list goes on.

The author got a whole 1 thing of minimal consequence, and one assertion without evidence.

[Tassman]

Thanks. It was a very important article providing relevant knowledge. Sometimes - especially right now - so many absurd things are going on that rather absurd stories get covered up by even more absurd stories.

Well put. Sessions has a lot of negatives, but in this instance he did the right thing by recusing himself rather than "making the Russia thing just go away", which is what Trump was demanding of his "personal attorney"...as he saw Sessions.

[Tassman]

Why is that abhorrent?

He argued against redefining what a "bona fide" relationship was. The SCOTUS overruled him. Big deal.

Because it was unconstitutional!

Good. Freakin pot heads...

Mind your own business.

Only in relation to matters of national security and classified information, as he should do.

But wikileaks re Hillary are OK apparently.

It is not the job of news organizations to propagate illegally obtained classified information. How would you feel if the news media published your SSN as part of "just doing their job"?

Good. Consequences for crime should suck donkey.

The consequences for crime do NOT include overriding civil rights of citizens.

This I gotta see...

The author got a whole 1 thing of minimal consequence, and one assertion without evidence.

There Are None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See.

[Bill the Cat]

No it is not.

Because it was unconstitutional!

No it wasn't. The SCOTUS never said it was unconstitutional. They simply clarified what a "bona fide" relative meant. But, again, idiot from Australia thinks he knows something...

Mind your own business.

Says the guy from Australia arguing about AMERICAN politics...

But wikileaks re Hillary are OK apparently.

I never said they were. In fact, I believe I said all hackers and stolen information leakers should have a brown recluse nest sewn up into their rectum... or something like that. It's a slap in the face of my profession, and I don't care WHO does it. They should all be shot.


Unless that news is none of anyone else's business.

The consequences for crime do NOT include overriding civil rights of citizens.

No one has the right to break the law.


Because a disproportionate amount of blacks commit crimes.

There Are None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See.

There are none so dumb as those who are liberal.

[One Bad Pig]

There Are None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See.

Oh, the irony.

[JimL]

Oh, the irony.

Oh, the broken record.

[One Bad Pig]

Oh, the broken record.

Yeah, your 'support' isn't exactly helping here, Mr. Dunning.

[Starlight]

Who's next off the Trumptanic?

Jeff Sessions, and Robert Mueller, both appear to be in the firing line (pun intended)...

So... as the Titanic sinks, who will be next to jump ship, or walk the gangplank?

Reince Prebius was the correct answer.

[Bill the Cat]

This is not uncommon in Presidential cabinets.

[Starlight]

This is not uncommon in Presidential cabinets.

He broke the record as shortest-serving Chief of Staff in all of US history. Not so common.

[Bill the Cat]

He broke the record as shortest-serving Chief of Staff in all of US history. Not so common.

Well, considering the position has only formally existed since 1961, that's not too huge. Plus, Pete Rouse only served for 3 months, although he was only acting Chief of Staff.

[JimL]

Well, considering the position has only formally existed since 1961, that's not too huge. Plus, Pete Rouse only served for 3 months, although he was only acting Chief of Staff.

That would be shortest in 56 yrs Bill, 14 presidential terms. Ya, thats huge. And it'll probably be a record far into the future as well.