Originally posted by Meh Gerbil
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Dawkins, NOMA, and You: Inchoate musings on things I don't really grok.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Doug Shaver View PostYou mean, if nothing logically follows from atheism, it's really difficult to falsify atheism?
One cannot falsify nothing.
I'd wonder why the person was wasting my time by stating nothing.
He could have literally said nothing and it would have meant the same thing.Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostI wouldn't say it would be difficult to falsify that type of atheism; I would say it would be impossible.
One cannot falsify nothing.
I'd wonder why the person was wasting my time by stating nothing.
He could have literally said nothing and it would have meant the same thing.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostI wouldn't say it would be difficult to falsify that type of atheism; I would say it would be impossible.
One cannot falsify nothing.
I'd wonder why the person was wasting my time by stating nothing.
I do accept "absence of belief in any god" as the best definition of atheism, but having said that, I think the sensible response from a theist is not "How would you falsify that?" but rather, "Why do you have no belief in any god?" If I couldn't give you any reason, don't you think you would then have grounds for objecting to my atheism?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doug Shaver View PostHe'll have to answer for himself. Just as Christians don't all agree on what it means to be a Christian, so too we atheists don't all agree on what it means to be an atheist. Of course, we all agree it must have something to do with God's nonexistence, just as Christians all agree that Christianity must have something to do with teachings attributed to Jesus of Nazareth. But that isn't saying much that is useful.
I do accept "absence of belief in any god" as the best definition of atheism, but having said that, I think the sensible response from a theist is not "How would you falsify that?" but rather, "Why do you have no belief in any god?" If I couldn't give you any reason, don't you think you would then have grounds for objecting to my atheism?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doug Shaver View PostI do accept "absence of belief in any god" as the best definition of atheism, but having said that, I think the sensible response from a theist is not "How would you falsify that?" but rather, "Why do you have no belief in any god?" If I couldn't give you any reason, don't you think you would then have grounds for objecting to my atheism?
I already know how you'd answer the question: "Why do you have no belief in any god?"
That is how familiar I am with your not-a-world-view.
We could carry out this conversation over the course of 50+ posts.
Instead of that noise let me go ahead and summarize as follows:
Meh Gerbil: "Why do you not believe there is a God?"
Doug Shaver: "I've see no evidence of a God."
Meh Gerbil: "How about the world around us?"
Doug Shaver: "That all has naturalistic explanation."
Meh Gerbil: "So love is explained thus?"
Doug Shaver: "Love is a name given to feelings of devotion which evolved to make society possible."
^--- As you can see, the adherence to atheism plays the defining role in how important questions about the world around us are answered by the atheist. It frames how the questions are asked, what are the acceptable parameters for an answer, and so on. That is why the term 'atheism' can be a handy title for a world-view. It is absolutely prescriptive and acts as a governor for all the important questions - the answers to which define a world view.Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostWhat you're accidently illustrating here is how atheism is, in fact, a world-view.
I already know how you'd answer the question: "Why do you have no belief in any god?"
That is how familiar I am with your not-a-world-view.
We could carry out this conversation over the course of 50+ posts.
Instead of that noise let me go ahead and summarize as follows:
Meh Gerbil: "Why do you not believe there is a God?"
Doug Shaver: "I've see no evidence of a God."
Meh Gerbil: "How about the world around us?"
Doug Shaver: "That all has naturalistic explanation."
Meh Gerbil: "So love is explained thus?"
Doug Shaver: "Love is a name given to feelings of devotion which evolved to make society possible."
^--- As you can see, the adherence to atheism plays the defining role in how important questions about the world around us are answered by the atheist. It frames how the questions are asked, what are the acceptable parameters for an answer, and so on. That is why the term 'atheism' can be a handy title for a world-view. It is absolutely prescriptive and acts as a governor for all the important questions - the answers to which define a world view.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostWhat you're accidently illustrating here is how atheism is, in fact, a world-view.
I already know how you'd answer the question: "Why do you have no belief in any god?"
That is how familiar I am with your not-a-world-view.
We could carry out this conversation over the course of 50+ posts.
Instead of that noise let me go ahead and summarize as follows:
Meh Gerbil: "Why do you not believe there is a God?"
Doug Shaver: "I've see no evidence of a God."
Meh Gerbil: "How about the world around us?"
Doug Shaver: "That all has naturalistic explanation."
Meh Gerbil: "So love is explained thus?"
Doug Shaver: "Love is a name given to feelings of devotion which evolved to make society possible."
^--- As you can see, the adherence to atheism plays the defining role in how important questions about the world around us are answered by the atheist. It frames how the questions are asked, what are the acceptable parameters for an answer, and so on. That is why the term 'atheism' can be a handy title for a world-view. It is absolutely prescriptive and acts as a governor for all the important questions - the answers to which define a world view.
You can't make a universal claim about atheism in this manner. It's not the same for everyone. Atheism for me is a conclusion, not a starting point.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostYou can't make a universal claim about atheism in this manner. It's not the same for everyone. Atheism for me is a conclusion, not a starting point.
Different definitions of the term were recognized early in the thread.Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostBut it isn't really "absence of belief in any god". Most people in the world believe in a divinity of some sort. Have always believed in a divinity of some sort. It's not that you lack belief, it's that you look around you at most people who do believe in a divinity and have decided that you do not believe in a divinity. It is an active belief that god/s do not exist, not some sort of psychological state where when the mention of "god/s" come up, your mind goes blank.
For that matter, most of my family is pretty blank when it comes to any god except for theirs. They don't know the names, they don't know even the regions or general groupings. It's not terribly far-fetched for a mind to go blank when gods are mentioned.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostNobody is making a weird all inclusive claim about atheists or atheism.
Different definitions of the term were recognized early in the thread.
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostWhat you're accidently illustrating here is how atheism is, in fact, a world-view.
*snip*
^--- As you can see, the adherence to atheism plays the defining role in how important questions about the world around us are answered by the atheist. It frames how the questions are asked, what are the acceptable parameters for an answer, and so on. That is why the term 'atheism' can be a handy title for a world-view. It is absolutely prescriptive and acts as a governor for all the important questions - the answers to which define a world view.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostYou say that, but it's not how it appears given:
Incidentally, how can you be making the argument that it isn't a world view when you use the term to summarize a bunch of data points into a conclusion that you'll use to analyze data moving forward? That is to say, if you've found plenty of data that illustrates to you that there is no god and come to the conclusion that 'atheism' is accurate that conclusion will certainly color your perception of data moving forward.
You have a world view that could accurately be described as an atheist world view.
I'm baffled as to why anyone would balk at that description.
Do you feel you open yourself up to a particular line of attack by using it?Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostThat quote has to be taken within the context of previously allowed definitions.
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostIncidentally, how can you be making the argument that it isn't a world view when you use the term to summarize a bunch of data points into a conclusion that you'll use to analyze data moving forward? That is to say, if you've found plenty of data that illustrates to you that there is no god and come to the conclusion that 'atheism' is accurate that conclusion will certainly color your perception of data moving forward.
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostYou have a world view that could accurately be described as an atheist world view.
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostI'm baffled as to why anyone would balk at that description.
Do you feel you open yourself up to a particular line of attack by using it?
There isn't a particular line of attack that's opened up here, though, more like a particular dismissal. "You're just an atheist therefore you'll interpret any data a certain way" is both false and insurmountable. No amount of argument will change the mind of a person who holds that belief.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostBecause the underlined isn't correct. I don't use the conclusion of atheism to analyze data. Which is why this: *snip quote* Isn't accurate.
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostThere isn't a particular line of attack that's opened up here, though, more like a particular dismissal. "You're just an atheist therefore you'll interpret any data a certain way" is both false and insurmountable. No amount of argument will change the mind of a person who holds that belief.
Secondly, the idea that an atheistic world view will interpret data in a particular way (in general terms) is dead on accurate. For example, if someone brings Tassman into a hospital and he's frothing and foaming like he usually does on these boards, the assertion that Tassman is demon possessed is going to be dismissed by the atheist immediately. If someone has reached the atheist conclusion the supernatural is entirely cut out of questions regarding origins, ethics, beauty, etc. (roll with me on that and don't get hung up on edge cases...sheesh)
Usually people aren't 100% a particular world view.
They gravitate between them - they're constantly in flux.Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostMost people holding a belief is pretty irrelevant.
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostThere are, in fact, an increasing number of people for whom there will be blankness when gods are mentioned.
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostI strongly suspect my daughter will be one of those.
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostFor that matter, most of my family is pretty blank when it comes to any god except for theirs. They don't know the names, they don't know even the regions or general groupings. It's not terribly far-fetched for a mind to go blank when gods are mentioned.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by whag, 03-27-2024, 03:01 PM
|
39 responses
186 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Yesterday, 03:32 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-17-2024, 04:55 PM
|
21 responses
132 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 03-21-2024, 12:15 PM | ||
Started by whag, 03-14-2024, 06:04 PM
|
80 responses
428 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Yesterday, 12:33 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-13-2024, 12:06 PM
|
45 responses
305 views
1 like
|
Last Post 03-17-2024, 07:19 AM | ||
Started by rogue06, 12-26-2023, 11:05 AM
|
406 responses
2,517 views
2 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Yesterday, 05:49 PM
|
Comment