Originally posted by Sparko
View Post
In practice we operate on subjective evidence, even in life and death situations, on a daily basis.
This also means that for people like Tassman evidence for Evolution is subjective.
He doesn't perform the experiments himself (I presume) but relies on the testimony of others.
What is interesting is that if you're an eye witness the evidence for you is not subjective but objective.
If you experience God that is an objective evidence for you; when you share it with a friend it is subjective for that friend.
Whether people agree with that assessment or not the fact remains that 'subjective' isn't a dirty word.
Comment