I have seen in passing some cautions against doing a mirror reading of the text. As I understand the concept, a mirror reading means that one has assumed that the discussion of a doctrinal issue (in an epistle) thereby implies that this original audience was erring in the discouraged behavior.
Is there a more accurate term? Is there a better definition?
What is the main concern against mirror reading?
Can a mirror reading actually reveal the actual situation that was occurring among the original audience members?
When can we possibly accept a theory developed in such a manner?
Are mirror readings just plain wrong?
Is there a more accurate term? Is there a better definition?
What is the main concern against mirror reading?
Can a mirror reading actually reveal the actual situation that was occurring among the original audience members?
When can we possibly accept a theory developed in such a manner?
Are mirror readings just plain wrong?
Comment