Thread: Obama's Watergate?
-
June 1st 2010, 02:10 PM #31
Re: Obama's Watergate?
MM is right though. It all depends on the wording I guess, and the level of layers between the offer and the maker as well I guess.
I mean, if you were to say, "hey, I know you want to run for this office, but I think we have a place for you here that better suits your skill and our over all game plan as a party..." That's one thing. If you just come out and say, "We can't have you there. Tell you what, I know you don't have the skill or credentials for it, but we'll put you in position over here if you drop so our guy can win the election..."
It all depends on wording as well as intent."Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 02:17 PM #32
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Well for one thing, influencing an election with the offer of a job or other compensation is illegal.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/29/600Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
-
June 1st 2010, 02:20 PM #33
Re: Obama's Watergate?
But neither wording or intent are going to put him in watergate land.
I see it like this. However long ago, Obama was offered a healthcare vote from Arlan as long as he would support him in his election. Obama said OK, and when the time came, he told his competitors that they shouldn't run, blah blah blah, and that he could find other jobs for them. It seems perfectly reasonable that you try to spread your party out a little, rather than have them all fight for one spot. So he said look, you can have this gravy job that doesn't require you to do much (advisers do all the work anyway) and you can run again in 5-10 years.
And this is supposed to remind me of watergate?
-
June 1st 2010, 02:24 PM #34
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Gotcha.
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 02:26 PM #35
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
-
June 1st 2010, 02:31 PM #36
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Hmmm, at the most, if it rises to that level, Rahm might be facing trouble. To answer your op again, no, it doesn't mark the end for Obama.
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 02:33 PM #37
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Here it is, from former ethics advisor to the Bush administration:
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201005250033
Sestack was not a federal employee so it's not a crime. End of story.The allegation that the job offer was somehow a "bribe" in return for Sestak not running in the primary is difficult to support. Sestak, if he had taken a job in the Administration, would not have been permitted to run in the Pennsylvania primary. The Hatch Act prohibits a federal employee from being a candidate for nomination or election to a partisan political office. 5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)(3). He had to choose one or the other, but he could not choose both."Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 02:50 PM #38
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Um, the whole point of the job offer was to get Sestak out of the primary race, so the fact that if had he accepted the offer he would have been unable to run is irrelevant. The White Hourse wanted Sestak out so their guy could have smooth sailing, so they offered Sestak something of value in exchange for him dropping out of the race which is explicitly prohibited by law (if it was sufficiently valuable to entice him to drop out of the race then it was something of value as far as the law is concerned).
And just to be clear, Sestak was not offered a job that coincidentally would have required him to drop out of the race; on the contrary, he was offered a job specifically in exchange for his dropping out of the race:
Also, it's an astronomical stretch to suggest that Rahm Emanuel was acting indecently without Obama's knowledge.Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
-
June 1st 2010, 02:56 PM #39
Re: Obama's Watergate?
All of that may very well be true, indeed I think it is, but if Sestak isn't a federal employee then it's completely legal. My initial criticism that this betrays the idea of a transparent administration still stands. Though, everyone seems to know and have known about this so maybe even that's not so egregious.
Last edited by Pilgrim; June 1st 2010 at 03:02 PM.
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 03:42 PM #40
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
-
June 1st 2010, 03:57 PM #41
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Read my post number 37 and the link with it which quotes former Bush adviser on ethics, Richard Painter, explaining this. He explains that the law in question only prohibits such offers when made to federal employees.
"Yes, I'm quite concerned about health care issues surrounding leaked radiation from Japan. Now, please pass me my super sized, bacon double cheeseburger, combo meal..."
When I was young I admired clever people. Now that I'm older I admire kind people.~Rabbi Abraham Heschel
My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly, I don't care. ~ Don Miller Blue Like Jazz
-
June 1st 2010, 04:08 PM #42
Re: Obama's Watergate?
I suggest you read it again because it says nothing of the sort. Painter's defense seems to be that the only reason Sestak was asked to drop out of the race was because accepting the job would have required him to ("The Hatch Act prohibits a federal employee from being a candidate for nomination or election to a partisan political office."). Sestak apparently understood things differently and alleges that he was offered the job as an incentive to drop out of the race.
Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
-
June 1st 2010, 04:21 PM #43
Re: Obama's Watergate?
Obviously, I'm no expert, but if we are reliant on Sestak's understanding, then there isn't much of a case because that's a fairly shaky thing upon which to build a prosecution, no? I mean, even if it is implicitly understood to be a bribe, how far can that go in the courts?
Either way. It's fun political theater to watch. It good come-uppance for people who ran on a transparent platform of changing Washington. If nothing else, the hypocrisy is obvious.
fwiw,
guaca.Hello!
-
June 1st 2010, 04:27 PM #44
-
June 1st 2010, 04:27 PM #45
Re: Obama's Watergate?
I'm not inclined to believe that Sestak's understanding of the offer is mistaken. I mean really, if everything was on the up-and-up then why didn't the president present the offer himself instead of sending Bill Clinton to do his dirty work?
Depends on what comes out in the investigation.I mean, even if it is implicitly understood to be a bribe, how far can that go in the courts?Some may call me foolish - some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of men
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From Fool's Gold by Petra
Similar Threads
-
looks like Obama's willing to bow to just about anyone
By Darth Executor in forum Civics 101Replies: 36Last Post: February 3rd 2010, 12:56 PM -
Obama's war on CO2
By OtherCheek in forum Civics 101Replies: 38Last Post: February 21st 2009, 05:23 PM -
Obama's infomercial
By Philosophickle in forum Civics 101Replies: 14Last Post: November 2nd 2008, 10:21 AM -
Obama's former pastor
By Vigilante in forum Civics 101Replies: 180Last Post: April 6th 2008, 09:31 AM -
How much will the Right use Obama's race?
By FirstSunday33ad in forum Civics 101Replies: 29Last Post: October 12th 2007, 08:55 AM















































































Quote


A Prayer Request, of Sorts
Today, 12:21 PM in LDS - Mormonism