-
June 16th 2010, 07:08 PM #61
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 16th 2010, 08:21 PM #62
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
I'll be out of town for the next few days with little to no internet access. So, see you all!
To be the value of a bound variable or not to be
-
June 16th 2010, 08:31 PM #63
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 16th 2010, 09:58 PM #64
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
I don't imagine so.
Hallucinations are caused by chemical imbalances whereas visual sensations are produced by light impinging on eye cells.
Memory of a certain visual scene, say of a sunset, is biologically different from a visual experience of that sunset.
They might all be "mental images" in some sense but they're not the same brain process and, I take, not the same mental process.
But how could you possibly know the difference?The source may be different, one based in reality and one not...
I give you two pictures, one of a barn another of a cat.
I tell you "one is based in reality and the other isn't" and then leave you to the task of figuring out which is which.
The problem with this should be obvious, but it applies equally to your view.There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 17th 2010, 06:13 AM #65
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
I'm not sure. A mental image is a mental image. I did my share of trips in the late sixties (I know, that explains it : ) - even there hallucinations play on, though distort, reality. They certaintly didn't seem much different than wild dreams for instance.
Well that would apply across the board with all our subjective, mental experiences.But how could you possibly know the difference?
I give you two pictures, one of a barn another of a cat.
I tell you "one is based in reality and the other isn't" and then leave you to the task of figuring out which is which.
The problem with this should be obvious, but it applies equally to your view."And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 17th 2010, 08:57 AM #66
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
I hate to be curt here, but this is just wrong.
Imagining something is not the same thing as seeing it. Recalling a memory is not the same thing as seeing something.
Some hallucinations or dreams can be quite vivid, but they're not the same thing -- that's why we call them hallucinations and dreams.
These are obviously different phenomena.
The mere fact that you can now label them as "hallucinations" as opposed to mental images or experiences shows you don't believe these two things to be the same thing.I did my share of trips in the late sixties (I know, that explains it : ) - even there hallucinations play on, though distort, reality. They certaintly didn't seem much different than wild dreams for instance.
It would IF your view were correct.Well that would apply across the board with all our subjective, mental experiences.
But since your view isn't correct, and we can easily tell memories and imaginings apart from veridical experiences, we don't have this skeptical worry.
But yes, for YOUR view it's quite a problem: it destroys all hope of making sense of perception.
I'd say that shows there's a problem with your view if it doesn't let you differentiate experience from hallucination.There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 17th 2010, 09:34 AM #67
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
ENeGMA, I'm not sure what the problem is - a mental image is a mental image despite the source. We generally know the difference between hallucinations and memories for instance. And when I close my eyes and imagine a sunset I do "see" something - there is an image. Not much different that the images I find in dreams.
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 17th 2010, 03:04 PM #68
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
They're not the same thing.
That's the problem.
That's a point in my favor, not in yours.We generally know the difference between hallucinations and memories for instance.
No, you don't "see" anything. You see with your eyes. Anything else is not seeing in anything but a metaphorical sense.And when I close my eyes and imagine a sunset I do "see" something - there is an image. Not much different that the images I find in dreams.
You're trafficking in conceptual confusions here.There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 17th 2010, 03:51 PM #69
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
Ok one is a mental image and the other is what?
I'm not trying to make a point. This is just a simple discussion...That's a point in my favor, not in yours.
Metaphors as far as I know don't have form or color or depth. My images do.No, you don't "see" anything. You see with your eyes. Anything else is not seeing in anything but a metaphorical sense.
You're trafficking in conceptual confusions here."And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 17th 2010, 06:09 PM #70
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
I think we're being imprecise in our terms here and are consequently talking past each other.
I don't understand what you're trying to say in calling both hallucinations and veridical experiences "mental images".
There are no things in your brain or mind called "images" which you put in front of your "mind's eye" and apprehend them such that hallucinations and veridical experiences are both "images".
Certainly hallucination or imagination FEELS LIKE seeing an image, but it isn't. That's what makes it a hallucination or an imagination.
Tell me, when you have a visual experience of an actual object, say a coffee cup, what is do you see: that object or an image of that object?There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 17th 2010, 06:34 PM #71
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
Last edited by seer; June 17th 2010 at 06:43 PM.
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 17th 2010, 11:38 PM #72
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 18th 2010, 05:48 AM #73
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
-
June 18th 2010, 01:28 PM #74
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
Sure. I can imagine all kinds of things. But that doesn't mean I'm seeing an image when I do that.
In fact, it can't be that: if I were seeing in image then it wouldn't be imagination, would it?
Simple: they're not real.Who knows, I certainly don't. Don't you have dreams? Where do all those figures, colors, shapes live?There'll be no more counting the cars on the garden state parkway
Nor waiting for the Fung Wah bus to carry me to who-knows-where
And when I stand tonight, 'neath the lights of the Fenway
Will I not yell like hell for the glory of the Newark Bears?
Because where I'm going to now, no one can ever hurt me
Where the well of human hatred is shallow and dry
No, I never wanted to change the world, but I'm looking for a new New Jersey
Because tramps like us, baby, we were born to die
-
June 18th 2010, 05:05 PM #75
Re: Natural vs Non-Natural Properties
"And all our yesterdays have lighted fools, the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” Shakespeare
Similar Threads
-
death = natural; disease = natural?
By jimmybob479 in forum Applied Protology 301Replies: 3Last Post: March 21st 2007, 12:47 PM -
Natural
By headheart in forum Theology 201Replies: 10Last Post: October 15th 2006, 04:13 PM -
What is a 'natural' right?
By Carpedm9587 in forum Civics 101Replies: 65Last Post: January 15th 2006, 10:50 PM -
How Can the Natural Man Believe God?
By GoBahnsen in forum Theology 201Replies: 70Last Post: December 21st 2004, 10:56 AM
















































































Quote

Seeking
Today, 03:34 PM in Christianity 201