-
June 23rd 2010, 09:12 AM #91
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
"Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Job 13:15
"Choice trumps knowledge" JAF
Macroevolution: Unmitigated extrapolation coupled with unrestrained imagination generously sprinkled with wishful desires.
Macroevolution: If you don't think about it, it makes a lot of sense.
-
June 23rd 2010, 10:13 AM #92
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
What will you be doing for RATE Jorge? Are they going to put you in charge of explaining impact craters?


- T"First understand, then criticize! Not the other way round." - Per Ahlberg, TR
Jorge Stock Excuse Quick Reference Guide:
1) You're drunk / high on drugs
2) You're too stupid / ignorant / dishonest to understand
3) Explaining is a waste of time
4) This assertion is true because I said so
5) This assertion is even truer because I said so twice
6) I already provided evidence (in huge detail) but I won't repeat it or link to it.
-
June 23rd 2010, 10:23 AM #93
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Well if you decide to be honest and rewrote that for the times I called you evasive without justification, you'd have zip all.
Not my research nonsense, I'm talking about the nonsense research going on at this group - try to focus your crusty mind for once. Plus your hyperimagination has failed to correctly quantify my standards yet again. This paper sounds interesting, but then so did your "ask Jorge any question" thread, where you provided some interesting gems of imaginative science. You can tell us Jorge, how has your previous work gone down at this group?As for your "research" nonsense, I just finished writing a paper regarding
alleged 'science', SETI and related topics. For that dull mind of yours, what
I'm saying is that you ought to apply those standards at home before you
attempt to impose them on others. To wit : "research" conducted to find
the alleged "missing link" in some remote part of Africa is as much "research"
as what you're attributing to what Baumgardner et al. do. Look in the mirror, kiddo!
Jorge
So when your membership precludes certain conclusions, how can you really call it research? I agree that if this goes on in other fields, they are just as guilty. But here we are dealing with a specific group and specific membership requirements.Last edited by Omega Red; June 23rd 2010 at 10:32 AM.
Support the campaign to bring back the Golf arcade game
-
June 23rd 2010, 10:29 AM #94
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
With each one of these, your nose grows longer.
Show me where I've stated this.Sure, not problem. You stated a line of reasoning attributed to me which began with:Once again you distort and misrepresent what others say.
You are simply not an honest individual, O-Mudd.
And I am simply saying that such a premise is absolutely unsound, and I simply do not use it, period. I was not saying YOU said that was true. I was saying YOU said that was one of MY premises, and then I showed you why you were WRONG.
Originally posted by Jorge
No - the only one refusing to submit to truth is you jorge, the truth of the fact YEC can't be supported scientifically.God knows that I have tried to educate you on the core issues here (the word that you
mocked not too long ago). You simply refuse to submit to any truth that does not
align itself with what you have chosen to believe -- never mind the fact that what you
have chosen to believe goes against God's Word.
Hovind never won any debates in the sense of establishing scientific support for YEC. What you call winning is most likely just dumping so much cow dung the opponent had no possibility of shoveling it out of the way in his allotted time. Hovind was the lowest of the low when it comes to YEC. The fact you admire him speaks so loudly about you I need to turn down the volume.You got it backbuttwards, kiddo. I remember hearing Kent Hovind say on more than
one occasion that there were many Atheists and TEs with far more knowledge of hard
science than he had and that were far smarter than he was. But, he continued, the
reason why he so often and easily won in their debates (and he did win, I have dozens
of his debates on tape to prove it) was because he was standing on scriptural Truth
while they were standing on lies and distortions. I couldn't have said it better myself.
Ok - I retract what I said about Baumgardner's competence ...Man-o-man are you one screwed-up puppy! FYI, Baumgardner has personally invited me
to join their research organization.
So much for your nonsensical "embarrassment".
You still have no clue you were their scape goat for the steam explosion hypothesis do you? Or maybe not. Maybe all of you agreed that if you posted that nonsense the AIG/ICR etc of the world could save face with plausible deniability while the could still float the idea for those ignorant enough to swallow it. Who knows.
Oh - I see. Volcanic steam explosions 'swoosh' over my head. Right. The only thing swooshing over anybody's head around here are the comets falling into the sun that you deny exist.As for the ideas that I present, just because they swoosh beyond your comprehension
does not mean that the problems are in the ideas themselves ... try a mirror.
Jorge, the fact you have to resort to calling my comments 'distortions' without actually pointing out what is wrong with what I have said is telling. I can point to specific examples - you denying comets fall into the sun despite videos of it happening, or you denying stars form in spite of photograph after photograph of all stages of star formation, or you claiming meteor craters are steam explosions despite all the evidence for impacts and against your theory. I don't have to denigrate your words without examples, I just have to post examaples and let your own words speak for themselves.Distortions, misrepresentations and lies never hurt or offend me. They tick me off, but they
can't hurt me. Thus, feel free to continue spitting your venom, O-Mudd (you were going to
do so anyway but now you have my permission to do so).
Jorge
Jim"Let the hand not say to the foot - I have no need of thee ..."
"I assume you have prepared new insults for me today ..."
- Spock (the younger)
-
June 23rd 2010, 11:01 AM #95
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Always strive to keep an open mind – but not so open that your brains fall out!Still afeared of & dodging The PINTM
-
June 23rd 2010, 11:16 AM #96
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Always strive to keep an open mind – but not so open that your brains fall out!Still afeared of & dodging The PINTM
-
June 23rd 2010, 08:27 PM #97
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - Apophatic
-
June 23rd 2010, 09:24 PM #98
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Attachment 82321

- T"First understand, then criticize! Not the other way round." - Per Ahlberg, TR
Jorge Stock Excuse Quick Reference Guide:
1) You're drunk / high on drugs
2) You're too stupid / ignorant / dishonest to understand
3) Explaining is a waste of time
4) This assertion is true because I said so
5) This assertion is even truer because I said so twice
6) I already provided evidence (in huge detail) but I won't repeat it or link to it.
-
June 23rd 2010, 11:31 PM #99
-
June 24th 2010, 12:22 AM #100
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Yes, and I've made that point on numerous occasions before. Its just awfully hard to find anything that differentiates.
Still that is precisely the way some YEC groups behave with the exception that the make those writing for them swear by signing oaths and statements of faith to the effect that they will disavow any data that conflicts with their predetermined conclusions.
Always strive to keep an open mind – but not so open that your brains fall out!Still afeared of & dodging The PINTM
-
June 24th 2010, 04:15 AM #101
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
If only we had a dollar for every time you posted an evasion.
We could pay off the national debt!
eta - Bah, darn you rogue!
also, not that I want to cancel the Jorge's Unintentional Comedy Hour show, but since none of the Creationists want to discuss the OP seriously, do any evolution advocates have any comments other than those posted on page 1?Last edited by USIncognito; June 24th 2010 at 04:39 AM.
-
June 24th 2010, 08:47 AM #102
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
"Let the hand not say to the foot - I have no need of thee ..."
"I assume you have prepared new insults for me today ..."
- Spock (the younger)
-
June 24th 2010, 09:46 AM #103
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Ah, the usual bile filled bluster from Fraudnandez.
Say - how did those high-level meeting with Giit et al. go? You know, the ones where you folks were supposed ot actually come up with a relevant, rigorous definition of biological information - that you've been touting for like 6 years?
-
June 24th 2010, 09:49 AM #104
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
-
June 24th 2010, 09:51 AM #105
Re: AIG - 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid
Similar Threads
-
We might have been able to Avoid GWII!
By Da Lone-Warrior in forum Civics 101Replies: 11Last Post: October 31st 2005, 04:08 AM -
What arguments do you avoid using?
By Jin-Roh in forum General Theistics 101Replies: 17Last Post: April 15th 2005, 03:06 PM -
reason why you should avoid the IRC chat?
By Sheepdog in forum Rec RoomReplies: 23Last Post: September 17th 2004, 12:36 AM -
How do we avoid Tri-Theism
By markporter in forum Theology 201Replies: 32Last Post: November 7th 2003, 05:49 PM

















































































Quote


A Prayer Request, of Sorts
Today, 12:21 PM in LDS - Mormonism