Terrorist Attack: London

[Darth Executor]

Bit early to gleefully make such posts isn't it guys? I'm sure you're posting with relish to prove some kind of overarching point, but it seems to be the same every time there's a (suspected) terrosist attack.

Progressives import mountains of third world savages to rape, rob and murder people. One day people will snap out of their stupor and you'll miss the times when the backlash only consisted of gleeful posts on the internet.

C7jnMXAWsAAyQIS.jpg

[Trout]

Progressives import mountains of third world savages to rape, rob and murder people. One day people will snap out of their stupor and you'll miss the times when the backlash only consisted of gleeful posts on the internet.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21559[/ATTACH]

Think Starlight realizes he's an apologist for mass murderers?

[rogue06]

Thank goodness UK gun laws prevented this guy getting his hands on a gun. Or the death toll might have been 49 like it was in Orlando, rather than 4.

Does it really have to be pointed out that many of the worst incidents of terrorism in this century didn't involve firearms?

• 9/11, USA (2996 killed and 8900 wounded): hijacked planes using box cutters
• Bali, Indonesia 2002 (202 killed and 209 wounded): bombings
• Madrid, Spain 2004 (191 killed and 1876 wounded): bombings
• London, England 2005 (56 killed and 784 wounded): bombings
• Mumbai, India 2006 (209 killed and 714 wounded): bombings
• Al-Adnaniyah and Al-Qataniyah, Iraq 2007 (520 killed and approximately 1500 wounded): bombings
• Baghdad, Iraq 2016 (324 killed and 225 wounded): bombings and arson

And the last I checked France's stringent gun control laws didn't stop the mass shootings in Paris in 2015 where 137 were killed and 352 wounded. Almost all of the worst massacres involving firearms were done by paramilitary groups conducting raids on villages and camps -- things no form of gun control could prevent.

[lilpixieofterror]

Do you mean that religion is evil, that guns kill people, or that Western military intervention in the middle east inspires terrorism?

I didn't know that you were a comedian! Tell us your next joke like how France or Belgium was attacked for their massive interventions in the Middle East, or how knives never kill people, or how atheists have never killed anyone. Keep living in your world of fantasy and delusion there.

[Darth Executor]

[Starlight]

Think Starlight realizes he's an apologist for mass murderers?

Eh? I thought I was critical of the military?

Progressives import mountains of third world savages to rape, rob and murder people.

US crime rates have decreased in areas of high immigration, reports show:

immigrants are less likely than US-born citizens to commit crimes and be imprisoned.

...“foreign-born residents of the United States commit crime less often than native-born citizens.”

...“all immigrants are less likely to be incarcerated than natives relative to their shares of the population”.

...If natural-born citizens were incarcerated at the same rate as undocumented immigrants, there would be about 893,000 fewer US-born citizens in prison

D.E.'s brain trying to comprehend basic mathematical facts: "Error. Error. Does not compute."

[Starlight]

Tell us your next joke like how France or Belgium was attacked for their massive interventions in the Middle East

The terrorists who did attacks in those countries were pretty explicit that their activities were in retribution for those country's military interventions in the middle east.

[Darth Executor]

Eh? I thought I was critical of the military?

US crime rates have decreased in areas of high immigration, reports show:

immigrants are less likely than US-born citizens to commit crimes and be imprisoned.

...“foreign-born residents of the United States commit crime less often than native-born citizens.”

...“all immigrants are less likely to be incarcerated than natives relative to their shares of the population”.

...If natural-born citizens were incarcerated at the same rate as undocumented immigrants, there would be about 893,000 fewer US-born citizens in prison

D.E.'s brain trying to comprehend basic mathematical facts: "Error. Error. Does not compute."

I never said anything about all immigrants, you idiot. I said liberals import third world savages, which they do. The fact that they also import indian and chinese programmers among others has nothing to do with my comment because they're neither third world nor savages.

[Starlight]

I said liberals import third world savages, which they do. The fact that they also import indian and chinese programmers among others has nothing to do with my comment because they're neither third world nor savages.

I wasn't aware of your hierarchies of race. If you could provide a chart with clear categories, along with notations of what needs to be done with each group (genocide, tolerate, import more of, etc) , that would be helpful for future reference.

[Darth Executor]

I wasn't aware of your hierarchies of race. If you could provide a chart with clear categories that would be helpful.

Helpful for what?

[TheWall]

Does it really have to be pointed out that many of the worst incidents of terrorism in this century didn't involve firearms?

• 9/11, USA (2996 killed and 8900 wounded): hijacked planes using box cutters
• Bali, Indonesia 2002 (202 killed and 209 wounded): bombings
• Madrid, Spain 2004 (191 killed and 1876 wounded): bombings
• London, England 2005 (56 killed and 784 wounded): bombings
• Mumbai, India 2006 (209 killed and 714 wounded): bombings
• Al-Adnaniyah and Al-Qataniyah, Iraq 2007 (520 killed and approximately 1500 wounded): bombings
• Baghdad, Iraq 2016 (324 killed and 225 wounded): bombings and arson

And the last I checked France's stringent gun control laws didn't stop the mass shootings in Paris in 2015 where 137 were killed and 352 wounded. Almost all of the worst massacres involving firearms were done by paramilitary groups conducting raids on villages and camps -- things no form of gun control could prevent.

Tokyo sarin gas attack.
Jack the ripper.
Richard Ramirez.
Just a few more.

[lilpixieofterror]

The terrorists who did attacks in those countries were pretty explicit that their activities were in retribution for those country's military interventions in the middle east.

Because we all know how much France and Belgium are known for their military intervention. Of course I'm sure you have some examples of appeasing an aggressive nation or group prevents them from killing people because I seem to recall appeasing them just leads to even bigger wars later.

[lilpixieofterror]

Tokyo sarin gas attack.
Jack the ripper.
Richard Ramirez.
Just a few more.

Oklahoma City Bombings.

There's another for the list.

[Starlight]

Because we all know how much France and Belgium are known for their military intervention.

The attacks in those countries happened within months of them having deployed troops in the middle east, and some of the terrorists literally said that was why they were doing it.

[lilpixieofterror]

The attacks in those countries happened within months of them having deployed troops in the middle east, and some of the terrorists literally said that was why they were doing it.

The Middle East is a large place and I see you dodged the question. When has ignoring an aggressive military power, bent on world conquest ever been prevented by appeasing them?