Starlight,
The Constitution has provisions for amendment.
Under no circumstances was a judge supposed to be able to exclude portions based on his own personal understanding of what is relevant for today and what is not. That would essentially make a judge a dictator.
We basically have oligarchy the way it is.
Anyways I'm on vacation right now, so I won't be able to comment on this thread much more.
Thank you for your thoughtful contributions.
The Constitution has provisions for amendment.
Under no circumstances was a judge supposed to be able to exclude portions based on his own personal understanding of what is relevant for today and what is not. That would essentially make a judge a dictator.
We basically have oligarchy the way it is.
Anyways I'm on vacation right now, so I won't be able to comment on this thread much more.
Thank you for your thoughtful contributions.
Comment