Thread: What "perfect" meant
-
November 11th 2010, 03:38 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 9th, 2010
- Posts
- 514
- Blog Entries
- 2
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Male - ChristianWhat "perfect" meant
First off, the bible says “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.”
God’s perfection has nothing to do with the notion of “lacking.” If so, then humans would not have been given the command to be perfect(not lacking); for it IS impossible for humans to be not lacking anything. So God’s perfection has nothing to do of being complete, of or not lacking.
God is Life, and Life has nothing to do with perfection. Life is continuously changing in times. We cannot subject the idea of completeness to Life. As God lives, He can have wants and needs. Wanting and needing does not make God imperfect, lacking the power to fill His wants and needs is what will make Him imperfect. I’ll say that NOT ALL of the aspects of the Godhead can be subject to the question of lack. God has the power to act on a whim, that, also, cannot be subject to be judged on the concept of perfection.
FEBBrethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Gal 3:15
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us,... was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 2 Cor 1:19
-
November 11th 2010, 04:43 AM #2
Re: What "perfect" meant
Maturity, can take a lifetime.
-
November 11th 2010, 08:07 AM #3
Re: What "perfect" meant
I think in that specific verse, Jesus is telling us to love everyone, and to love them completely; to be perfect in your regards to others, just as God does. You need to look at the context.
-
November 11th 2010, 11:27 AM #4
Re: What "perfect" meant
To my knowledge the only one declared perfect by God was Job. But from a modern definition of perfect Job was not. So we read the Book of Job to obtain that image of the perfect man. In my eyes God does not care about the fluff that surrounds us but maintains His focus on the relationship He has with a man. In this regard Job was perfect, he lived his life with God, he trusted God and not man. Job understood that evil is not God and the ways of God are not man's. Job did not try and make God into a limited man.
-
November 11th 2010, 12:20 PM #5
Re: What "perfect" meant
I view "perfect" as being synonymous with omniscient, omnipotent, all-good, etc. It's roughly "the best everything that anything could ever possibly be, only better". As such, humans can never truly attain it
-
November 11th 2010, 01:26 PM #6
-
November 11th 2010, 03:06 PM #7
- Join Date
- May 9th, 2010
- Posts
- 514
- Blog Entries
- 2
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Male - ChristianRe: What "perfect" meant
Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Gal 3:15
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us,... was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 2 Cor 1:19
-
November 11th 2010, 03:18 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 9th, 2010
- Posts
- 514
- Blog Entries
- 2
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Male - ChristianRe: What "perfect" meant
What it takes to be perfect in our regards to others?
I don't see that having love and regards to others would make us perfect. I do not see Christ's idea on of the perfection complementing love on that text.
On another place, Paul speaks of perfection as attaining and image, image of God.
Ephesians 4:13-14
13Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
14That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
Thanks,
FEBBrethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Gal 3:15
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us,... was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 2 Cor 1:19
-
November 11th 2010, 03:21 PM #9
- Join Date
- May 9th, 2010
- Posts
- 514
- Blog Entries
- 2
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Male - ChristianRe: What "perfect" meant
Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Gal 3:15
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us,... was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 2 Cor 1:19
-
November 11th 2010, 03:34 PM #10
- Join Date
- May 9th, 2010
- Posts
- 514
- Blog Entries
- 2
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Male - ChristianRe: What "perfect" meant
I believe that there is an essence perfection that is of God alone. And there is a perfection that is attainable by humans. I am aiming that by understanding the concept of those perfections, God will not be tied to the idea of nothing to to anymore.
I don't know how I will get there, but it is worth trying, I guess.
Thanks,
FEBBrethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Gal 3:15
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us,... was not yea and nay, but in him was yea. 2 Cor 1:19
-
November 11th 2010, 04:10 PM #11
Re: What "perfect" meant
Good point. The Greek in that passage, the word used to mean "perfect" in both the clause about us being perfect and the one about God being perfect is the term "teleo" from "telos" meaning "goal," or "point toward which something moves." In other words not perfect in the sense lacking nothing but in terms of being completed in relation to achieving a goal. We are seeking the goal of being like God, being like Jesus, God is already there.
that means the anti-God argument has no real meaning because that does not eliminate creation. In fact if anything in mandates creation and evolution as well. Even scinece doesn't recognize a goal of evolution, it fits.
-
November 11th 2010, 04:13 PM #12
Re: What "perfect" meant
FEB,
Try post #6 + a study of the book of Galatians.
EJS
-
November 11th 2010, 07:02 PM #13
Re: What "perfect" meant
FarEastBird
But that is what Jesus was talking about.What it takes to be perfect in our regards to others?
I don't see that having love and regards to others would make us perfect. I do not see Christ's idea on of the perfection complementing love on that text.
Loving your own people is not good enough, Jesus says in verse 47. Love all people, as God does, in verse 48. Jesus is pretty clear here.
Does perfection therefore mean being perfect in the way we treat others? No (or at least not necessarily). Jesus' subject in verses 43 to 48 is not attaining perfection, but about how we treat others. He is saying that we should treat others in the prefect way that God treats others, he is not saying that you will be perfect if you treat others like that.
Why do you think they were using the word in exactly the same way, with regard to exactly the same facet of God? I would assume they were not even using the same language (Jesus in Aramaic, Paul in Greek).On another place, Paul speaks of perfection as attaining and image, image of God.
-
November 11th 2010, 08:53 PM #14
Re: What "perfect" meant
By your words "merely acknowledging God" you seem to be diminishing the importance of the acknowledgment. I may be reading into what you say too much. For those who believe in God we feel it is a trivial thing to acknowledge God. But for those who do not believe the consequences are far reaching.
From God's point of view the universe is a created thing of no real importance. So any of our beliefs or ideas about the universe are nothing. But our relationship with God is very important to God. So having a relationship with God gets you in the area of perfection. All of doctrine and scientific nonsense means nothing.
-
November 12th 2010, 06:05 AM #15
Re: What "perfect" meant
Yes, it is. Yet, our problem is our relationship with ourselves. 99.9% of the time, we get the idea about a relationship with God correct, but we fail to deal with what is smack dab right in front of us. We are. Science and Doctrines, give us some insight about what it is that is blocking us from having this relationship with God, and in some sense there is a fragment of truth in both, but unless we really come to terms with what is blocking us from the Sunshine of His love, we are going to merely be applying cosmetic changes.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Sawyer
Similar Threads
-
Practice Makes Perfect: Bush "drills" the troops before tele-conference...!
By Ben Franklin in forum Civics 101Replies: 65Last Post: October 17th 2005, 09:31 PM -
"Atheism is perfect."
By The Laughing Man in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 89Last Post: July 5th 2005, 02:23 PM -
I guess this is what the Democrats meant by "pre-emptive" action
By The Laughing Man in forum Civics 101Replies: 14Last Post: October 25th 2004, 12:39 PM















































































Quote



Brutal cleaver assault on British...
Today, 03:56 PM in Civics 101