On case of Stubblefield, accused of rape of patient with cerebral palsy DJ:
According to Singer, 'if someone not capable of giving informed consent, having sex with him mebbe not wrongful because he might enjoy it! Who needs consent???' Of course, we could ask him 'in that case does not logic of yours justify bestiality?'
Libs' sacred Consent: can be thrown in dumpster any time! And when progs wanna dump it to normalize sex with animals they will do it with reasoning like Singer's ("[animals] may lack the concept of consent altogether...makes it less clear what the nature of the wrong might be. It seems reasonable to assume that the experience was pleasurable to [animals]...")
Originally posted by Singer
Libs' sacred Consent: can be thrown in dumpster any time! And when progs wanna dump it to normalize sex with animals they will do it with reasoning like Singer's ("[animals] may lack the concept of consent altogether...makes it less clear what the nature of the wrong might be. It seems reasonable to assume that the experience was pleasurable to [animals]...")
Comment