Trump would beat Clinton again, win popular vote

[Mountain Man]

Trump combines within himself and his presidency the Alzheimer's / dementia and TV-watching of Reagan, with the keen intellect and knowledge of Bush Jr, the corruption of Hillary Clinton, the pathological lying of Ben Carson, the womanizing of Bill Clinton, levels of golf-playing that Obama's worst critics imagined the man did, and the 4am twitter rants of... oh, no that's just Trump, no one else in politics does that. No wonder he's setting popularity records.

After all, in his first 100 days he's... declared that the '100 day' thing is arbitrary and that it's unreasonable for journalists to ask him why he hasn't achieved any of legislative things that his website promised he would do in the first 100 days. Meanwhile 85% of the 554 key executive branch positions that need Senate-approved presidential appointments are still waiting on Trump to name a nominee, and Trump is off visiting one of his properties for the 12th weekend in a row.

He could probably accomplish more if he didn't have to fight the Democrats, Republicans, and mainstream media for every inch of progress. There's also the fact that the liberal media is loath to mention a single one of his accomplishments, giving low-information morons like you the impression that he hasn't done anything.

[lilpixieofterror]

The fact that this Washington Post/ABC News poll showed that not only would Trump would win again if the election was held again today, but would also win the popular vote by a substantial margin has been very shocking to the liberal media. I think that they were more than a little startled and worried that there incessant attacks against Trump are having little to no effect. That the media narrative is being rejected. Of course when virtually everyone understands that you're little more than a propagandist it is difficult to convince people of anything.

More over, perhaps it is starting to finally sink in that it just may be that Trump won not because of any supposed Russian interference but because their candidate was truly ghastly.

Still, keep in mind, this is just a poll and polling has been far from accurate the past few years -- especially when Trump is involved in the mix.

I've heard it said before that Trump was one of the worst candidates, but Hillary Clinton was even worse. The media still hasn't figured that out yet.

[Meh Gerbil]

Hillary Clinton hardly passes as a human being much less a viable political candidate.