Ep 36 - Again & Again

[Chris D]

Ty, you're still completely missing the point. It makes me wonder if you're actually reading anything on the screen from Dee and me. We all agree they expected a "coming" of some sort. Simply quoting passages where He or the disciples mention His "coming" does not mean they were referring to His Second Advent. The fact is, they had no idea He was going to die and go anywhere, so they could not have expected a Second Advent.

[Dee Dee Warren]

Precisely Chris.

Ty, what part of "this is NOT an invitation to debate" was unclear to you? This is an announcement thread, not an ongoing debate thread. Simply because I choose to do a podcast does not give you the right to insist I have to put aside valuable time to debate you. It is a fruitless exercise that many people have been down. You don't listen to what your opponents actually say, and when the going gets rough, you claim special spiritual insight and rant about the unsealing of prophecies.

Not interested. This area is my playground, and I am taking the ball, and showing you the gate.

[TyRockwell]

Precisely Chris.

Ty, what part of "this is NOT an invitation to debate" was unclear to you? This is an announcement thread, not an ongoing debate thread. Simply because I choose to do a podcast does not give you the right to insist I have to put aside valuable time to debate you. It is a fruitless exercise that many people have been down. You don't listen to what your opponents actually say, and when the going gets rough, you claim special spiritual insight and rant about the unsealing of prophecies.

I see your game. You first mentioned "announcement thread" in post number 11, before which, you said: "But I still want you to answer the Delaware question. It is a logical outworking of your eisegesis."

So take your fruity Delaware football. AND ponder which coming Jesus meant in Matt. 23:38. The disciples meant THAT one.

You stop making comments about me, and I won't respond. DEAL? Do something else with your 'loose ends.' I saw the innuendo.

G' day

[TyRockwell]

• Edited by a Moderator •

[Dee Dee Warren]

I see your game. You first mentioned "announcement thread" in post number 11, before which, you said: "But I still want you to answer the Delaware question. It is a logical outworking of your eisegesis."

Because I don't mind limited interaction.

You stop making comments about me, and I won't respond. DEAL?

Nope. I will do what I wish in my own area. Tough.

Do something else with your 'loose ends.' I saw the innuendo.

OMG!!! LMBO!!! You actually thought the thread title was about YOU? Get over yourself. It is a series I am doing that is about Pastor Boyle. Can you fit through doors with that head?

[TyRockwell]

Then again and again, you allow for "limited interaction" as long as you can declare yourself the winner. So, your head is as bloated as anyone's.

Tough.

Now I'll go away, if you'll not "egg on" the issue.

[Dee Dee Warren]

Ty, please don't post in this area again. Not this thread, this area. And you do not dictate what I say. Feel free to start a psychotherapy thread and whinge to your heart's content.

[ApologiaPhoenix]

So, you are actually arguing that they might have been taught about the geography of Delaware? Really?

Well one could argue that Jesus knew the disciples had enough suffering ahead of them and did not want to make it worse by mentioning Delaware.