Originally posted by Jorge
View Post
1) A simple "yes" or "no" is what I am looking for, not evasiveness, not vagueness, not a book plug.
Yeah, right. If I answer with a simple "yes" then you come back with, "That's vague." I am well aware and experienced regarding the dishonesty of critters such as you. When appropriate I DID answer with a simple "yes or no" (see my answer to your #2 question). Oops - GOT YOU!!! What you call a "book plug" was a source providing the proofs you insinuated did not exist. In any event, you demonstrate your dishonesty below yet again ... watch ...
2) Thank you for an illustration of the intellectually crippling effects of creationism. You have not seen my material on ERVs, yet your prejudice leads you to reject it out of hand. You can find it if you google "barryhisblog".
Nice illustration of your intellectual dishonesty. First, this was never about you or your ideas. Second, your ERV material is NOT "rejected out of hand". I've been studying this field for decades and nothing - not one thing - is convincing in your position. Your ERV material is a rehash of the same arguments. You simply hate it when someone like me calls you out and rubs your smug face into reality - that torments you to no end. And so you lash out as you do here. Suck it up, buttercup.
3) "... that answer demands qualification as it insinuates things that don't hold water." Evasive and vague.
Ah, there it is again, the ol' catch-all "excuse". Stamp a giant F on your forehead, Barry - you FAILED!
Jorge
Yeah, right. If I answer with a simple "yes" then you come back with, "That's vague." I am well aware and experienced regarding the dishonesty of critters such as you. When appropriate I DID answer with a simple "yes or no" (see my answer to your #2 question). Oops - GOT YOU!!! What you call a "book plug" was a source providing the proofs you insinuated did not exist. In any event, you demonstrate your dishonesty below yet again ... watch ...
2) Thank you for an illustration of the intellectually crippling effects of creationism. You have not seen my material on ERVs, yet your prejudice leads you to reject it out of hand. You can find it if you google "barryhisblog".
Nice illustration of your intellectual dishonesty. First, this was never about you or your ideas. Second, your ERV material is NOT "rejected out of hand". I've been studying this field for decades and nothing - not one thing - is convincing in your position. Your ERV material is a rehash of the same arguments. You simply hate it when someone like me calls you out and rubs your smug face into reality - that torments you to no end. And so you lash out as you do here. Suck it up, buttercup.
3) "... that answer demands qualification as it insinuates things that don't hold water." Evasive and vague.
Ah, there it is again, the ol' catch-all "excuse". Stamp a giant F on your forehead, Barry - you FAILED!
Jorge
Comment