Trump gives highly classified information to the Russians

[Zymologist]

I like this one:



um what does an ambassador to India dying of an illness have anything to do with the election or Trump?

"An illness." That what they calling it now?

Edit: I bet it had something to do with lead poisoning.

[Charles]

um what does an ambassador to India dying of an illness have anything to do with the election or Trump?

Most likely nothing. They do not claim that all dead Russians have anything to do with it and they mention that of course some died for natural reasons.

[Meh Gerbil]

So far the trail of Russians that I've seen have all either:
A: Been nowhere near the case, such as the Ambassador to India
B: May have had proximity, such as the Ambassador to the U.N. , but died of natural causes as determined by our doctors.

The outlier would be Oleg Erovinkin who is suspected of being a leaker of information to MI-6 regarding alleged connections between the Trump campaign and the Russians. The problem is that this evidence is not evidence of collusion as much as it is evidence of the Russians attempting to gain control over Trump with allegations of "compromising personal and financial information about Trump." That isn't working together, that is attempted blackmail on the part of the Russians. Source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politi...report-russia/

So no, far from the FBI agent's claim there is no trail of bodies.
The single body that could maybe be implicated in all of this would be the body of a blackmailer, not a cohort.

[Meh Gerbil]

Most likely nothing. They do not claim that all dead Russians have anything to do with it and they mention that of course some died for natural reasons.

You cited the FBI agent and a 'trail of bodies'.
I think it is fair to ask to see this trail.

I've yet to find this trail.

[Sparko]

Most likely nothing. They do not claim that all dead Russians have anything to do with it and they mention that of course some died for natural reasons.

yet they make a list of all of these dead Russians as if having such a large "trail" of dead Russians means something sinister with regards to Trump who has no ties to any of them. This is what I meant by "suspicions and rumors"

You kept mentioning this trail of dead russians. so I looked it up. None of them have any ties to Trump or even the election!

show me which ones do.

[Meh Gerbil]

Clint Watts does mention that they are not all working for the government, so basically this list will not necessarily contain all the people. Perhaps far from.

Again, I think that for this to be used as evidence we should have access to a 'trail of bodies'.
If we don't have access to the list then the evidence should be retracted.

Now then, I doubt you'll be able to produce this list of bodies but instead of this being vindication for Trump(1) let's take a look at a much larger problem. You see, instead of worrying about whether or not Trump is guilty or recoiling in horror that your source turned out to be a whack job I think you should be very, very angry that CNN lied to you. Why is it that some dork on TWEB has to ask the question "What bodies?" - how is it that an FBI agent can put such an astonishing claim out there and not be challenged by the reporter? Seriously, set the Trump thing aside for a moment and allow yourself to get angry that CNN is doing such a horrible job at getting you reliable information. You should be furious.

Can you see why CNN is referred to as fake news?







NOTES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: I don't seek vindication for Trump. I play the long game, my friend.

[JonathanL]

Ad hominem.

[Mountain Man]

yet they make a list of all of these dead Russians as if having such a large "trail" of dead Russians means something sinister with regards to Trump who has no ties to any of them. This is what I meant by "suspicions and rumors"

You kept mentioning this trail of dead russians. so I looked it up. None of them have any ties to Trump or even the election!

show me which ones do.

Yeah, but, but Trump is under investigation! That's suspicious in and of itself and justifies the investigation. I mean, if he was innocent then there would no need for an investigation, an I right?

[rogue06]

No-Evidence-600-LI-594x425.jpg

[rogue06]

here is a more detailed list:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/24/europe/dead-russians/

again, nothing to tie them to Trump (or even the election) as hard as they try.

I like this one:



um what does an ambassador to India dying of an illness have anything to do with the election or Trump?

Sounds like adding to dots for people to connect and come to an unwarranted conclusion

[Mountain Man]

Sounds like adding to dots for people to connect and come to an unwarranted conclusion

Create a complicated enough web, and the low-info crowd will think it's suspicious simply because it's complicated.

[Tassman]

Are you talking wrongdoing of "he collaborated with the Russians to hack the election"?
I've not seen any evidence of that (I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I've just not seen it yet).

[Tassman]

Create a complicated enough web, and the low-info crowd will think it's suspicious simply because it's complicated.

So says the mouthpiece for the selective reporting of the "fake news" Alt-Right Breitbart.

[Mountain Man]

So says the mouthpiece for the selective reporting of the "fake news" Alt-Right Breitbart.

Funny thing about that, you've never actually shown a single one of their stories to be wrong when I cite them as a source.

[Meh Gerbil]

I already saw the trail of bodies claim in another thread.
Even a small examination of that evidence, as offered by a former FBI agent no less, fell apart like a cheap card table in a hurricane.

I expect your 'evidence' is much the same stuff.
Time will tell.