Trump gives highly classified information to the Russians

[Mountain Man]

Source: Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/...-didnt-happen/

© Copyright Original Source

[Mountain Man]

Same naive goofballs I see, still defending the corrupt Russian puppet that you've ignorantly put into the White House. Its too obvious to argue the point with you anymore, too much of a waste of time, just going to bop in once in a while for a good laugh. You defenders of Trump are a hoot!

The fact that you and Dimbulb are so quick to buy into a fake news story is hilariously ironic.

[Tassman]

Seems it was quickly established the story was nonsense made up by WaPo within a few posts. FWIW, the story has also been denied by a number of officials (including General McMaster, who was in the room when it allegedly happened), although give the glaring contradictions exposed, this is more like the cherry on the fake news cake. So what does Trump hypothetically giving classified information to the Russians have to do with the steaming pile of manure you tried to pass off as "news"? There's nothing to be interested in here, other than to just make yet another amusing observation that for a super smart atheist with a really high IQ who is also a scientist you seem surprisingly easy to dupe.

General McMaster's denial was not related to the actual Washington Post story. What he denied was that Trump gave away the sources of the info. whereas the allegation is that Trump shared some information about laptops on planes which potentially put a source at risk and was given to the US by an ally who did not give consent for that to be shared with Russia. It's just incredible that the under educated ignoramuses who support Trump defend him come what may.

[Mountain Man]

So, unnamed sources versus people who have gone on record to say the report is false. Who should we believe? That seems to be a tough question for low-info morons.

[Mountain Man]

General McMaster's denial was not related to the actual Washington Post story. What he denied was that Trump gave away the sources of the info. whereas the allegation is that Trump shared some information about laptops on planes which potentially put a source at risk and was given to the US by an ally who did not give consent for that to be shared with Russia. It's just incredible that the under educated ignoramuses who support Trump defend him come what may.

[Meh Gerbil]

If he gave the Russians classified information I hope he got paid for it.
I hate it when our officials sell us out and don't make bank. (1)







NOTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: I find I can avoid disappointment by changing my expectations to match reality.

[Sparko]

McMaster reiterated his statement in a subsequent appearance at the White House on Monday and described the but did not take any questions.

They even reported it as false in their very own article. Nice way to cover their butts.

[Sparko]

Undisclosed sources at Theologyweb stated that Starlight once again posted fake news and JimL fell for it hook, line and sinker.

smileyhooked.gif

[MaxVel]

General McMaster's denial was not related to the actual Washington Post story. What he denied was that Trump gave away the sources of the info. whereas the allegation is that Trump shared some information about laptops on planes which potentially put a source at risk and was given to the US by an ally who did not give consent for that to be shared with Russia. It's just incredible that the under educated ignoramuses who support Trump defend him come what may.

The problem for you is that it's very evident that nothing Trump says or does can be OK in your eyes, and every negative report about him is definitely true.

Trump may be many things, many bad things, but you have zero credibility or objectivity when it comes to analysing his actions and words.

tl;dr: Your blind hatred of Trump robs you of any credibility. Which means that no-one cares what you say or think about him, or about them.

[Sparko]

The problem for you is that it's very evident that nothing Trump says or does can be OK in your eyes, and every negative report about him is definitely true.

Trump may be many things, many bad things, but you have zero credibility or objectivity when it comes to analysing his actions and words.

tl;dr: Your blind hatred of Trump robs you of any credibility. Which means that no-one cares what you say or think about him, or about them.

That.

[JimL]

Your tinfoil hat is a bit slanted, you might want to fix that.

[Mountain Man]

The problem for you is that it's very evident that nothing Trump says or does can be OK in your eyes, and every negative report about him is definitely true.

Trump may be many things, many bad things, but you have zero credibility or objectivity when it comes to analysing his actions and words.

tl;dr: Your blind hatred of Trump robs you of any credibility. Which means that no-one cares what you say or think about him, or about them.

Trump fires Comey. Liberals say, "Why did you fire him? Is it because he got too close to the truth?"

But if Trump didn't fire Comey, liberals would say, "Why didn't you fire him? Is it because he influenced the election in your favor?" which was the case they've been making for months.

[rogue06]

While several of those present have provided unqualified rebuttals of the anonymous, unsubstantiated claim that Trump provided classified information to the Russians what is beyond any doubt is just this last June Obama did give some information to the Russians (through the Syrians) concerning some of the things happening on the ground there. As a result the Russians attacked some of those sites of our allies.

[One Bad Pig]

Your tinfoil hat is a bit slanted, you might want to fix that.

2017-05-16-7fc38818_large.jpeg

[Sparko]

While several of those present have provided unqualified rebuttals of the anonymous, unsubstantiated claim that Trump provided classified information to the Russians what is beyond any doubt is just this last June Obama did give some information to the Russians (through the Syrians) concerning some of the things happening on the ground there. As a result the Russians attacked some of those sites of our allies.