Physically Weaker Men Tend To Be Liberal...

[seer]

This explains a lot, liberal men are wussies...

Study: Physically weak men more likely to be socialist, strong men more likely to be capitalist

A new study from Brunel University London found that physically weaker men are more apt to believe in socialist policies, such as redistribution of wealth. Meanwhile, stronger men are more geared to believe in the capitalist concepts, such as the idea that people should keep what you earnhttp://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05...be-capitalist/

http://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-eve...study-suggests

[Meh Gerbil]

I dunno, I'm pretty conservative.

[seer]

I dunno, I'm pretty conservative.

Well they didn't study Gerbils...

[Jedidiah]

This explains a lot, liberal men are wussies...

Averages again.

[seer]

This does make sense though. Women tend to vote liberal because they rely more on social programs to care form them. Weaker men may feel like women, that they need the government to help support them.

[Meh Gerbil]

Seer,

This is Anna.
She'd like to talk with you about your 'weak women' comment.
article-2424291-1BE3E151000005DC-987_634x864.jpg


Nice knowing you, buddy.

-Meh Gerbil

[Meh Gerbil]

This does make sense though. Women tend to vote liberal because they rely more on social programs to care form them. Weaker men may feel like women, that they need the government to help support them.

I think women tend to vote liberal because they've a tendency to care more about social conditions (other people) as a whole. I think men are naturally less social and less concerned with others.

[seer]

Nice knowing you, buddy.

-Meh Gerbil

I bet she is not a liberal...

[seer]

I think women tend to vote liberal because they've a tendency to care more about social conditions (other people) as a whole.

No, like with weaker men, I think it is purely selfish. After all they do use social services at a much higher rate than men.

[firstfloor]

This explains a lot, liberal men are wussies...

.

[Meh Gerbil]

.

That was my first thought as well; however, seer is on my side so I'm going to give him a pass.
Say, wanna hit the gym after work?

[seer]

.

Actually FF, it sounds like what we find in our nearest primate cousins. Alpha males dominate. Evolution in action... You're good with evolution - right?

[Mountain Man]

Makes sense. A physically weaker specimen would want to be taken care of. And what is the central premise of liberalism? "Don't worry, somebody else will take care of you."

[Meh Gerbil]

Makes sense. A physically weaker specimen would want to be taken care of. And what is the central premise of liberalism? "Don't worry, somebody else will take care of you."

I don't think it is that simple.

We live in a technologically based society where a physically weaker man (e.g. Bill Gates) may amass a rather significant fortune and not need anyone to take care of him. In fact, I know of very few jobs that require enough physical strength were this could be a society wide phenomena - even in factory jobs here in Michigan many of the assembly line workers are women. Safety regulations no longer allow people to lift heavy loads so the equipment put in place allows weak people to do that job. In short, most jobs are information based and if you're strong enough to work a keyboard you'll be able to provide for your family all day long actually earning more than the typical manual labor job.

In short, I don't see the connection between physically weak and unable to make huge $$$$.
I think the theory that physically stronger men have a tendency to be self-centered is a better fit.

[firstfloor]

Makes sense. A physically weaker specimen would want to be taken care of. And what is the central premise of liberalism? "Don't worry, somebody else will take care of you."