Originally posted by crepuscule
View Post
Again, the existence of a regression is dependent on (the possibility of) existence existing, but not necessarily caused by it.
Exactly. That’s why a regression being contingent on existence is not the same as a regression being caused by existence. You keep on arguing as if the first implies the second.
Yup.
And an ‘infinite set of finite and temporal causes’ can’t be uncaused existence because?
The regression as a whole would be uncaused. Each part is caused by another.
So according to you that can't exist either?
And the incarnation it became evident that He was both God and being a man which is not God.
No, I’m arguing that uncaused existence need not be God, i.e. God is not just uncaused existence.
Comment