Originally posted by crepuscule
View Post
Again, the existence of a regression is dependent on (the possibility of) existence existing, but not necessarily caused by it.
contingent on existence is not the same as a regression being caused by existence. You keep on arguing as if the first implies the second.
Yup.
Ah, you missed the point. Uncaused existence yes. But the caused causes are not the existence. Uncaused existence and uncaused regression are two different things, even though uncaused regression must be the same thing as uncaused existence in being uncaused too. So just as things in space, taking up space, are not space.
The regression as a whole would be uncaused. Each part is caused by another.
So according to you that can't exist either?
And the incarnation it became evident that He was both God and being a man which is not God.
not just uncaused existence.
Comment