There is no evidence for a biblical jesus

[Rational Gaze]

I don't find you trustworthy. You're a bully and a braggart and a boor.

Abra kadabra, you're an idiot. Congratulations.

[SarahB]

Abra kadabra, you're an idiot. Congratulations.

And you; you're a real piece of work, too. Very intelligent, though. A shame, really.

I saw your complaint thread. I think you got a raw deal.

[lilpixieofterror]

Um...dear...one will major in a particular field of science (sometimes more than one) but they don't declare in conversation that they are a "science major". One can infer that you don't frequently associate with people in such endeavors; that your declaration is simply another vaunted confabulation.

Hehehe, I see Sarah doesn’t read conversations and only picks and chooses the parts she wants to hear. You did read the part where smackedbyavan51times said that all Christians were ignorant of science, right? I simply pointed out to him that I wasn’t and showed how. I think I forgot something though… in SarahB land^TM, anybody that points out facts relevant to the case are simply ‘bragging’ and not refuting, with evidence, a false statement. Gosh, you whine about me ‘making numerous logical errors’ and you make a simple reading comprehension error, yet, I’m suppose to believe a word you say? You’re a riot, that’s for sure.

I'm sorry, your toxic obsessive charade really isn't worth my time right now. Your blathering is evidence enough. Perhaps another day we can banter further.

More empty passive-aggressive bluster. I knew you were lacking answers, but gosh, you didn’t have to make it this obvious. Now can you show just one of these ‘numerous logical errors’ you claimed I made? I have a feeling I might be waiting a long time for this after all, it seems you can’t admit you were outright wrong with your interpretation of Matthew 5:22, so I don’t think I should expect much out of you.

OK, one more. Here's what you said about "present forward":
Do you really think ANYONE at Theologyweb believes this---believes that you are knowledgeable enough to make that statement with educated certainty---or do they more likely think you just made it up?

More empty bluster, but still nothing that proves me wrong… maybe I should go watch a movie or clean up my kitchen waiting for you to actually produce something of value? Again, I have heard and read this phrase before and so far all you have really presented is that you think it’s ‘oddly phrased’, but really not anything objective beyond your personal opinion. Funny, I’ve seen it used before and used it before, but only you have said that it’s an ‘odd phrase’ which I have a feeling that you simply don’t read that much. Now perhaps you can present forward evidence that proves me wrong now or will you throw out yet more empty bluster that doesn’t address a word that was said?

I, for the most part, feel I can trust the Christians I know. I don't find you trustworthy. You're a bully and a braggart and a boor.

Gosh, imagine that, somebody starts a fight with me and whines at the top of her lungs when I refuse to stand by and take it. Yeah, how dare I call you passive-aggressive for trying to browbeat me into agreeing with you! How dare I call an atheist stupid for saying that there were no depictions of Jesus, as a human, before the 8th century! How dare I point out that I have a wide range of knowledge of a wide range of topics and actually show that I do by demonstrating this knowledge instead of bragging that I have this knowledge, but never showing I do! Oh I must be a ‘bully, a braggart, and a boor for not agreeing with SarahB and treating her with the respect she think she earns. Sorry child, you started this little fight and now you’re throwing a little temper tantrum that I turned around and hit you back. I learned, at a young age, if I start a fight, I shouldn’t complain when they hit me back. I didn’t follow you around and post nasty little comments about you; you did that to me though. Don’t like the attitude you got, don’t take part in it in the future. You earned the treatment I gave you.

Remember, Crystal, everyone can see right through you. Ask them.

More assertions without evidence, I seem to notice a pattern with you:

1. Make an assertion you can’t back up.
2. Whine and throw a fit when somebody points out you haven’t backed up your assertion.
3. Make more assertions that everybody can ‘see right through them’, but don’t present any evidence to back this assertion up either.
4. Call them all sorts of names and run away, declaring yourself the victor.
5. Repeat the above over and over again.

So when I ‘grow up’, can I become a member of The SarahB School of Debate and Reason^TM too? It seems to me that the little girl needs to put on her big girl panties and learn that if she starts fights with people, don't be suprised when they fight back. Did you grow up without learning that lession too?

Have a nice day.

See you in a few weeks after you come back to post more nasty little comments and whine when you get the attitude you earn. Have a nice day in your delusion and remember, you don’t need arguments, assertions are enough for you!

[lilpixieofterror]

Abra kadabra, you're an idiot. Congratulations.

Remember RG, in SarahB Land^TM 'everybody can see right though me', but the majority seem to be defending me and not her. Perhaps another one of her delusions will come crashing down before the day is up?

BTW notice how she is trying to butter you up? Nice ploy, isn't it?

[Xru]

Remember RG, in SarahB Land^TM 'everybody can see right though me', but the majority seem to be defending me and not her. Perhaps another one of her delusions will come crashing down before the day is up?

BTW notice how she is trying to butter you up? Nice ploy, isn't it?

Now is the time for that B-52 strike lpot.

BTW, of course we are defending you. Your are the lilpixieofterror.

[lilpixieofterror]

Now is the time for that B-52 strike lpot.

BTW, of course we are defending you. Your are the lilpixieofterror.

You mean that SarahB's delusions are wrong? I would love for her to tell me what everybody is suppose to be 'seeing though', but that might be something I have to wait awhile for, perhaps I can add that to the list of things I would like answered?

[Xru]

You mean that SarahB's delusions are wrong? I would love for her to tell me what everybody is suppose to be 'seeing though', but that might be something I have to wait awhile for, perhaps I can add that to the list of things I would like answered?

Maybe that can be your Christmas present. Ha ha ha.

[lilpixieofterror]

Maybe that can be your Christmas present. Ha ha ha.

Maybe, but I already got my early one about how to be a double speaking hypocrite, so that means I get another one? SWEET!

[Chrawnus]

I'm sorry, your toxic obsessive charade really isn't worth my time right now. Your blathering is evidence enough. Perhaps another day we can banter further.

And this is coming from the one who started this whole charade by obsessively stalking LPOT.

OK, one more. Here's what you said about "present forward":
Do you really think ANYONE at Theologyweb believes this---believes that you are knowledgeable enough to make that statement with educated certainty---or do they more likely think you just made it up?

A quick search on Google verifies LPOT's claim about the phrase "present forward", but you're simply to lazy to do even a Google search, are you not.

I, for the most part, feel I can trust the Christians I know. I don't find you trustworthy. You're a bully and a braggart and a boor.

And you're a hypocrite who has an unhealthy obsession towards LPOT.

Remember, Crystal, everyone can see right through you. Ask them.

We (i.e everyone) would prefer it if you didn't presume that everyone here is just as clueless as you are. As far as I can tell the only people who has something against LPOT are the regular gang of trolls and morons here on TWeb. You seem to be a new addition to that team.

Have a nice day.

Keep on trolling.

[Xru]

And you're a hypocrite who has an unhealthy obsession towards LPOT.

Well . . . her picture is really cute. I kinda have a crush on her too.

But she's in the Air Force and ya don't want to tick her off when she can bring down a B-52 strike on you.

Arclight baby.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Arc_Light

[Rational Gaze]

a B-52 strike on you.

Not to mention:
ac130e.jpg
and:
a-10-19990422-f-7910d-517.jpg

[seanD]

Are these guys for real? Even if I was arguing debate just for the fun of it (yes I could argue pro and con for the existence of Jesus because some of us have intellectual integrity), I could come up with plenty of reasons . . . and good ones .. . . why Jesus existed .. . exists. Even when I thought the Bible was fatally defective in translation, etc., the fact that there was a historical Jesus who had a ministry on earth was obvious.

Only, block heads and looney's could possibly argue otherwise. Why doesn't someone ban this bunch?

Lets take a ban vote: 1) all those in banning stupid atheists like those above vote yes.

2) Atheist and agnostics that have any intelligence can stay: vote yes.

The skeptical argument of Jesus' non-existence is self-defeating. It's like trying to convince people that the theory of black holes is erroneous and then starting your argument by denying the existence of gravity.

[Xru]

Not to mention:
ac130e.jpg
and:
a-10-19990422-f-7910d-517.jpg

Oh ya baby - I love Puff the Magic Dragon. One of the best parts of Transformers, IMO, was when they brought down the rain on one of the bad guys.

And the A-10 . . . too too bad. Love the 30mm cannon. 3,500 ft/sec, 42,00 round/min. Oh baby.

GAU-8_Avenger_contrast.jpg
Bring the rain.

[Rational Gaze]

And the A-10 . . . too too bad. Love the 30mm cannon. 3,500 ft/sec, 42,00 round/min. Oh baby.

For comparison:
GAU-8_meets_VW_Type_1.jpg

[Xru]

For comparison:
GAU-8_meets_VW_Type_1.jpg

That is so cool. I wish I could give you 10 amens for that. Really neat. Thanks.

If ya are looking at that picture make sure you click on it and you'll see the full size. It is really huge.