Six questions for Theists who endorse ET . . .

[israeltour]

1) why should I think it reasonable that Evolution occurred over billions of years when Evolution is dependent on mutations and the great majority of mutations are either maladaptive or neutral.

God said, "Let the earth bring forth..." -- Evolution
God said, "Let the waters abound..." -- Evolution... scant sealife evolving into abundant sealife

If God works through visions, why not mutations? If God will mutate your body to heal you, then why not mutate life to create new species?

2) why should I think Evolution, especially macro-evolution, is reasonable when there appears to be irreducibly complex systems in many/most organisms.

I believe Genesis said God did it, so it's reasonable.

3) why should I be confident in Evolution when there are huge gaps in the fossil record.

See answer to #2.

4) why should I have confidence in Evolution when evidence such as soft tissue in T. Rex bones is dismissed.

See above.

5) why should I have confidence in scientific constructs surrounding Evolution, archeology, geology, etc., when they are based on the fundamental assumption of "Uniformity."

To seriously consider non-uniformity in one area, you must assume an underlying uniformity. A true position of non-uniformity is unworkable, and makes everything unknowable.

6) why should I accept that life started spontaneously billions of years ago when scientist cannot demonstrate that the required organic molecules could be assembled in a primordial earth. "Life comes from life."

If God was required for it to happen, then you shouldn't be surprised if a scientist cannot replicate it.