Obama's Bath Certificate

[Epoetker]

Did you have questions about what goes on in a gay bathhouse? • Edited by a Moderator • Since Rick Perry's getting currently whined at by the Pink Mafia, a little turnabout is fair play:

Ever since investigative journalist Wayne Madsen wrote about Barack Obama frequenting gay Chicago bathhouse Man’s Country in the Andersonville neighborhood back when he was an Illinois state senator in the 1990s and early 2000s, I’ve seen comments from straight readers wondering what it’s really like inside a bathhouse — but for obvious reasons, bathhouses (here in Chicago at least) frown on allowing any sort of photography or video posting due to the expectations of anonymity possessed by all the men (such as the current President of the United States, Barack Obama) who are members of these “private clubs” (which are really just places to club other guys’ privates.)

Isn’t the “Tolerant Left” always insisting that everyone in this country needs to think, act, behave, and do exactly as they do, because they’re always right while conservatives are always wrong?

Well, if it’s acceptable to use anonymous sources to write about sexcapades Herman Cain allegedly engaged in decades ago…

and if it’s journalistic practice to waste ink speculating about what really went on in Newt Gingrich’s marriage…

and if it’s so much fun to talk about Michele Bachmann’s husband supposedly being gay…

then WHY NOT just answer every question anyone on Earth has ever had about what Barack Obama more likely than not (according to the standards set by journalists above) got up to during frequent visits to the Chicago gay bathhouse Man’s Country?

• Edited by a Moderator • Worse than the fact that Barack Obama is gay? He went to the dirty, low-class gay bathhouses.

Second obvious question: Are his children HIS children?

Moderated By: rogue06

Link contains inappropriate material

***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publically complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.

[KingsGambit]

That rumor-based sort of guilt by association didn't work against Jesus, and shouldn't work in modern politics, either.

[Epoetker]

That rumor-based sort of guilt by association didn't work against Jesus, and shouldn't work in modern politics, either.

The approved term is either 'the Messiah', or ALLAH HUSSEIN OBAMA, you insufficiently-tolerant bigot.

[Darth Executor]

I'd turn gay too if I was married to Chewbacca.

[Conductor42]

I'm going to file this in the "Who cares?" category.

[Mountain Man]

I'm going to file this in the "Who cares?" category.

On other hand, if it was a Republican...

[Ansgar Seraph]

On other hand, if it was a Republican...

. . . it'd be met with the same attitude. Like it was when Madsen accused Bush of having an affair with Rice or when he accused Rove of personally plotting the assassination of a Lebanese politician.

—Sam

[Leonhard]

Mods, does this qualify as trolling?

[Darth Executor]

Mods, does this qualify as trolling?

Why would it?

[Leonhard]

Why would it?

Isn't the very definition of trolling posts by someone that are obscenely inflammatory to inspire flame threads? I'm not sure what else I can make of the threads Epoetker opens. Post number three in this thread seems pretty clear cut.

[Cow Poke]

I'm going to file this in the "Who cares?" category.

I'd respond, but I'm totally apathetic to this.

[Jaecp]

Doesn't trolling require there to be some level of doing it for the lulz or for some level of disruption?

Epo seems to actually believe the stuff he says, so its not trolling its just the crazy.

@Mountain Man,

This kind of thing, when true, is only bad for republicans because its really rare for a non-republican to both campaign on family values or directly anti-gay stuff and then be caught doing the very thing they campaigned against. When the media harps on them it isn't for the gay, per se, but for the hypocrisy, which is an important thing for a politician not to have, isn't it?

[Darth Executor]

Isn't the very definition of trolling posts by someone that are obscenely inflammatory to inspire flame threads? I'm not sure what else I can make of the threads Epoetker opens. Post number three in this thread seems pretty clear cut.

I don't see how this thread is any more obscenely inflammatory than a lot of the crap that posted here. Not sure who here is still devoted enough to Obama to flame in his name anyway. Taoist?

[Darth Executor]

Doesn't trolling require there to be some level of doing it for the lulz or for some level of disruption?

Epo seems to actually believe the stuff he says, so its not trolling its just the crazy.

@Mountain Man,

This kind of thing, when true, is only bad for republicans because its really rare for a non-republican to both campaign on family values or directly anti-gay stuff and then be caught doing the very thing they campaigned against. When the media harps on them it isn't for the gay, per se, but for the hypocrisy, which is an important thing for a politician not to have, isn't it?

This is all BS. Democrats run on family values as well. That most people don't believe them from the start is another issue.

Here is Bill "I need a new humidor" Clinton, for example: http://articles.latimes.com/1992-05-..._family-values
Democrats bent over backwards to defend Clinton not just from adultery but from perjury (a crime) afterwards. Your post is particularly hilarious and lacking in self-awareness when it's common knowledge that Obama opposes gay marriage.

[Jaecp]

This is all BS. Democrats run on family values as well. That most people don't believe them from the start is another issue.

Here is Bill "I need a new humidor" Clinton, for example: http://articles.latimes.com/1992-05-..._family-values
Democrats bent over backwards to defend Clinton not just from adultery but from perjury (a crime) afterwards. Your post is particularly hilarious and lacking in self-awareness when it's common knowledge that Obama opposes gay marriage.

It's about the hypocrisy, and pulling out Bill Clinton as the go to comparison really weakens it. Old News and all that, when hypocritical republican sex scandals seem to happen all the time.

If I cared enough to argue with you, I could easily find a dozen republicans who rail on not just family values but on specifically anti-gay talking points who then, spoiler alter, sleep with a man. The magnitude of hypocrisy is different, no politician is going to say they are against family values, it just isn't done, but nothing requires a politician to make anti-gay part of their platform.