January 2012 Screwballs PLUS Platinum Reports

[Mountain Man]

<Sarcasm>

Hmmm, must make a note of that one for when my girls ares old enough to start dating.

This is a fair warning to those sarcastically impaired the preceding text was written in jest.

Anyhow, complete aside to the whole thread. Baby #4 will be another girl. Yup, I am the father of 4 girls. (and I will break any guy who hurts 'em)

There's a standing rule in my house that when my daughter reaches dating age (I'm thinking around 30) that any would-be suitor will have to get past her brothers first. Based on current physiology, at least one of them will be 6' 3" slab of muscle like his grandpa.

Truthfully, we have more reasonable strategies for dealing with the whole dating thing, but it's a fun thought.

[Raphael]

I'm smelling a Poe.

That or a serious nutter

[Raphael]

There's a standing rule in my house that when my daughter reaches dating age (I'm thinking around 30) that any would-be suitor will have to get past her brothers first. Based on current physiology, at least one of them will be 6' 3" slab of muscle like his grandpa.

Truthfully, we have more reasonable strategies for dealing with the whole dating thing, but it's a fun thought.

30? I think 40 is a much more reasonable age.

[Chaotic Void]

There's a standing rule in my house that when my daughter reaches dating age (I'm thinking around 30) that any would-be suitor will have to get past her brothers first. Based on current physiology, at least one of them will be 6' 3" slab of muscle like his grandpa.

Truthfully, we have more reasonable strategies for dealing with the whole dating thing, but it's a fun thought.

A Shotgun and a lagoon that you can fill with fertilizer afterwards?

[lilpixieofterror]

There's a standing rule in my house that when my daughter reaches dating age (I'm thinking around 30) that any would-be suitor will have to get past her brothers first. Based on current physiology, at least one of them will be 6' 3" slab of muscle like his grandpa.

Truthfully, we have more reasonable strategies for dealing with the whole dating thing, but it's a fun thought.

30? Dang... I wouldn't be able to date now, let alone be married.

[One Bad Pig]

A Shotgun and a lagoon that you can fill with fertilizer afterwards?

You need to dispose of the bones somehow.

[Raphael]

A Shotgun and a lagoon that you can fill with fertilizer afterwards?

Nope, wild pigs that will remove the evidence in a night or two. (like they did to the wild goats we shot)

[rogue06]

I'm smelling a Poe.

Doesn't he also support johnmartin's geocentrism?

[rogue06]

You need to dispose of the bones somehow.

There are several ways to dispose of a corpse that are relatively easy and actually work (most the stuff seen in movies doesn't work). The first, and... cheapest... [*looks around*] Um, this might not be the proper forum for such a discussion

[One Bad Pig]

Doesn't he also support johnmartin's geocentrism?

Yes, that's factored into my evaluation.

[Challenger Grim]

30? I think 40 is a much more reasonable age.

So you've given up on grandchildren, eh?

I trust we all agree here that Taken is the greatest movie of all time?

[Challenger Grim]

Anti-Screwball and Screwball to some people in the memebase website "Comixed" where someone did the whole "Jesus wasn't the only one born of a virgin etc" and of course you can guess how that is going, but someone named Mark actually linked to tektonics article on Mithra. Not sure if it's someone from Tweb that posted that or not.

I also wasn't sure if I can link to the site or not as there could be some language there given it's a comment thread and even though they cant' say too much there, there are abbreviations for swear words and phrases allowed that I don't think we allow here.

It was only put up the 29th of December so you can easily find it if you want. I just thought it was interesting, and cool, that someone there linked to JPHolding's site, but not surprised that everyone is applauding the maker of the 'comic'.

So I went back to that to look up some comments. Got to love this.

Context

You shouldn’t use Wikipedia as a source for your counter-argument. It’s not that reliable as a source. What you read 2 minutes ago may have been removed due to the fact that it was written by some vindictive moron.

© source where applicable

Sure,the largest encyclopedia ever written by mankind is not good enough as a counter-argument…….cool story bro!

And then I would post my address so he could send me a copy of the whole encyclopedia, right? Since linking to one on the internet isn’t acceptable to you.

In a scholarly paper, no, Wikipedia should not be used. Thank goodness Wikipedia is not meant for scholarly use! It’s meant to be a quick and easy resource for schmucks like me and you. It’s not the cesspool that you and other members of the “too-smart-for-Wikipedia” club make it out to be.

Thankfully, a wild Chewie appears to give us hope.
http://cheezburger.com/Chewie007/lolz/View/5626270720

[One Bad Pig]

Website nom:

http://www.crossoverchurches.org/5.html

[Rational Gaze]

The fail is strong with this one:

...what actually interests me is that the Tekton crowd seems to have very little interest in philosophy.

And then without any hint of shame or irony:

I'm very informed by philosophy. These guys are more about sociological stuff.

[KingsGambit]

Website nom:

http://www.crossoverchurches.org/5.html

It's usually a red flag when the largest section of a church's doctrine section is "Vaccines".