-
January 15th 2012, 11:46 PM #61
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
I don't think I want to give it to that useless organization that makes absolutely no impact, and has few convictions. Shoot, they all seem to agree with Tiggy that the Bible contains no true at all!
Sorry, Tiggy, I just had to use your name in this. I don't want, as you said in an earlier post, to start our sad debate again.http://themigrantmind.blogspot.com
.
Banned forever by the Amer. Scientific Affiliation, a Christian Scientific Group, for the crime of discussing the ethics of ignoring scientific data.
-
January 15th 2012, 11:47 PM #62
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
http://themigrantmind.blogspot.com
.
Banned forever by the Amer. Scientific Affiliation, a Christian Scientific Group, for the crime of discussing the ethics of ignoring scientific data.
-
January 15th 2012, 11:52 PM #63
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
I think my signature is fair. Their president didn't like me questioning whether or not a guy who couldn't answer a simple scientific question about whether or not one could get a good daily temperature reading if one put the thermometer next to an air conditioner should be running a scientific organization. He said he would have to think about that. And that guy is running the ASA. So the president shut down their old listserv and said I would not be welcome any longer. All this for the nasty habit of asking a question. You know, people just hate to be challenged about their religious beliefs.
http://themigrantmind.blogspot.com
.
Banned forever by the Amer. Scientific Affiliation, a Christian Scientific Group, for the crime of discussing the ethics of ignoring scientific data.
-
January 15th 2012, 11:55 PM #64
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
I have never said or thought the Bible contains no truth at all.
Please retract that falsehood, thanks.
I don't mind you using my name. Just don't fabricate things and attribute them to me.Sorry, Tiggy, I just had to use your name in this. I don't want, as you said in an earlier post, to start our sad debate again.
- T"First understand, then criticize! Not the other way round." - Per Ahlberg, TR
Jorge Stock Excuse Quick Reference Guide:
1) You're drunk / high on drugs
2) You're too stupid / ignorant / dishonest to understand
3) Explaining is a waste of time
4) This assertion is true because I said so
5) This assertion is even truer because I said so twice
6) I already provided evidence (in huge detail) but I won't repeat it or link to it.
-
January 16th 2012, 05:35 AM #65
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
That is a totally untrue statement about the ASA , Mr Morton
-
January 16th 2012, 08:43 AM #66
- Join Date
- May 14th, 2006
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 28,570
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Female - ChristianRe: What is the best way to get rid of...
And of course, you can't show a single case of that ignorance and do what you do best, call everybody stupid for disagreeing with you.
So it is not a fact that the KJV is written in a form of English that is 400 years old and many people who don't regularly read that form of English or are not accustomed to reading that form of English isn't an established fact? So you're saying that the KJV being based upon less accurate manuscripts that are in the Latin and tend to hold to a 'high Christology' that isn't found in older, Greek based manuscripts isn't an established fact? Wow Jorge, thanks for ignoring the established facts and simply doing what you do best, calling anybody you disagree with ignorant. Can you please show a single example of the KJV being more accurate then the NASV or show the KJV as being simpler to read and understand the the more modern translations out there?I had asked what you had done, not for you to mindlessly parrot the usual party-line quotes
concerning the 1611AKJV v. modern English translation. Clearly you are as clueless on
this matter as you are regarding Evolution and Gigayears.
Translation: "Crap, I can't answer that, let me run away and declare victory so I can pretend I know everything!"I guess the answer is that you've done nothing. Roger that... carry on, Terror.
And thus Jorge does what he does best, declares victory and never actually deals with the facts against his position. Once a fundy, always a fundy, eh Jorge?
Love is not blind; that is the last thing it is. Love is bound; and the more it is bound the less it is blind. GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy
Click here for an encouraging song!
-
January 16th 2012, 08:47 AM #67
- Join Date
- May 14th, 2006
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 28,570
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Female - ChristianRe: What is the best way to get rid of...
Love is not blind; that is the last thing it is. Love is bound; and the more it is bound the less it is blind. GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy
Click here for an encouraging song!
-
January 16th 2012, 04:56 PM #68
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
Last edited by DuraGizer; January 16th 2012 at 04:57 PM.
O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams.
-
January 16th 2012, 06:30 PM #69
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
Well this is derailing Glenn's thread, so I'll drop it. I do have to say however that I needn't dig deep into any barrel: When someone who claims 9+ years of expertise makes a claim that "And there was evening, and there was morning, day one" was a "modern translation", deliberately using an "indefinite/non-specific form" by "compromising translators", well, that claim has a tendency to -ahem- float to the surface.
Last edited by Faid; January 16th 2012 at 06:31 PM.
If two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong.
-
January 16th 2012, 08:14 PM #70
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
Go with the flow the river knows.
Frank Doonan
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Gifts of jade-silk change weapons and war into peace and friendship.
I do not know, therefore I think . . . and everything is in pencil.
-
January 16th 2012, 10:36 PM #71
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
Glenn, I suggest that you donate them to some person or group who would:
1) be able to use them in useful research, to educate others
2) not be deceived by their errors
This probably means a (non-YEC) Christian ministry or Christian college which is interested in either the history of YEC or in engaging YECs in discussion. Places that come to mind are ASA, RTB (Hugh Ross), Biola (John Bloom, Wm Lane Craig, et al), Ravi Zacharius Ministries, Wheaton College, Calvin College, etc.“God’s creation of the world structured the natural order in such a way that it could be comprehended by the human mind, by giving an inherent rationality to that created order which was derived from and reflected the rationality of the mind of God.” -- Origen of Alexandria
"Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions [regarding science] and are taken to task by these who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books." -- Augustine
"The Naďve View that creation was effected in one ordinary week about 4,000 B.C. is shaky on hermeneutical grounds and absurd on scientific grounds." -- Merrill F. Unger
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -– Albert Einstein
“I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives us a lot of factual information, puts all of our experience in a magnificently consistent order, but it is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God and eternity. Science sometimes pretends to answer questions in these domains, but the answers are very often so silly that we are not inclined to take them seriously.” -– Erwin Schroedinger
-
The following tWebber says Amen to KBertsche for this useful Post:
-
January 17th 2012, 08:54 AM #72
Re: What is the best way to get rid of...
************************************************************************************
Why not just say, "Anyone that is against Biblical Creationism" and save yourself a lot of typing?
"(2) not be deceived by their errors" --- you got'ta love the sheer magnitude of the irony - WOW!!!
Jorge"Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Job 13:15
"Choice trumps knowledge" JAF
Macroevolution: Unmitigated extrapolation coupled with unrestrained imagination generously sprinkled with wishful desires.
Macroevolution: If you don't think about it, it makes a lot of sense.
















































































Quote
Best of luck with you.



The Brother of the Lord
Today, 10:20 AM in Deeper Waters