-
March 26th 2012, 08:27 PM #406
My wife is a very loving and spiritual person. I'm sorry you can't feel my love for you as a brother in Christ. Maybe if you opened your heart a little more, you would be able to feel the love. It is genuine.
I am certainly not in agreement with arguments and reasons that Hitler and Stalin used to murder 100s millions of Jews and Christians amd others. It is shameful and scandalous that you would say such a thing.
The way this plays out in my mind and anyone else following this, if anyone is so unfortunate, is that you are just making up more false stuff about me and others.
Thanks, Robrechtוְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ אֲנִי יְהוָה
-
March 26th 2012, 08:36 PM #407
Re: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
Tell everyone pancreasman, how does it make you feel, to use the same arguments and reasons that Hitler and Stalin used to murder 100s millions of people, does it make you feel good? You throw words out into space, why don’t you actually stop for a minute a think about what your words mean, and who else used the exact same arguments and what they did with these arguments, these same lies have caused the deaths of millions and you use them with such pride. What kind of a person does this?
-
March 26th 2012, 09:13 PM #408
Re: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
Open my heart to what love? I see no love from you, I only see a depravity of the truth, and where there is no truth; there is no love. All I see from you is a self-deceived soul wallowing around in his own self-absorption, and maybe god will speak to you again through your little roadster, why don’t you ask him.
And yes you are, atheists and atheism (the centerpiece of Communism), and every argument Communists and Nazis used against Christians and Jews were the reasons they used to justify their actions in murdering millions of Christians and Jews, and you have in this thread many times sided with atheists against Christians so I am not lying, that just makes you a fool for not seeing it. The problem is that you have succeeded in lying to yourself, it is called self-deception.
You are a self-deceived; you just THINK you are a Christian. You want to be popular with the adversaries of truth in your desire to be popular, you were not successful in being popular amongst followers of Christ because they just point out your selfishness, so they are too judgmental, but atheists are all about the materialism, so you fit right in as an all-round good guy.Last edited by ST Mannew; March 26th 2012 at 09:16 PM.
-
March 26th 2012, 09:21 PM #409
-
March 26th 2012, 09:43 PM #410
-
March 26th 2012, 09:47 PM #411
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - ApophaticRe: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
About the same as it feels for you to agree with the anti-antisemitism expresseds by various Christians through the ages. About the same as it feels for you to belong to a faith in whose name many people have killed. Of course, being rational, I recognize that just because some Christians behave badly that does not impugn Christianity as a whole. There are and have always been very wise and compassionate Christians whose scripturally supported faith leads them to proclaim peace and love in the most trying of circumstances. They are to be admired. In a similar way, I can admire the integrity of anyone regardless of their beliefs so long as they act with love and charity. Except for Nascar enthusiasts of course.
-
March 26th 2012, 10:40 PM #412
-
March 26th 2012, 10:52 PM #413
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - ApophaticRe: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
Eph 4:15Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ.
1 Peter 3:15But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,
More Bible verses I find wise and illuminating. Obviously we should be concerned with truth, but our style in delivering what we think is the truth is vitally important. If it is necessary to advise us to 'speak the truth in love' then it must be possible to speak the truth without love. How does this work out practically? I think 1 Peter gives very practical instruction in what 'speaking the truth in love' ought to look like.
-
March 26th 2012, 10:59 PM #414
Re: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
It is irrational and a erroneous argument to say of someone who is a follower of Christ, who is Himself a Jew, that a follower of Christ can be “antisemitism expresseds by various Christians through the ages”, because if this was true what he was accusing a “christian” of doing then they would no longer be a Christians, would they? So your accusation does not apply. And using a reason people do the awful things that you have accused Christianity of being responsible for, is like saying that; Jesus Christ is responsible for all of these things.
This is what I believe, Jesus Christ is truth itself, and it is only in this Way that the realization of God is realized in a person. Simple as that, anymore difficult than this, we wouldn’t have a chance in hell. Tell me, what is love, how does or how can anyone know what love is unless they had a standard in which to follow that showed, them how to love? Anyone who believes that Christ is the truth knows what love is, because love is, the love of the truth. And why are you associating “Nascar enthusiasts” and Christians? Are you insinuating that all conservative Christians to be “Nascar enthusiasts”? You would be wrong,I don’t like Nascar, the UFC, boxing or any other macho show sports either.
Note: You will notice that pancreasman did not disavow himself from these atheist arguments used by communists to persecute Jews and Christians, but rather he tried to accuse me of hating Jews instead, even through I already have told him that I believe that a Jew is truth itself, now you can’t get much more complimentary than that can you?Last edited by ST Mannew; March 26th 2012 at 11:05 PM.
-
March 26th 2012, 11:06 PM #415
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - ApophaticRe: The Laws of Logic Imply God's Existence
You remember the topic? Anyone?
I have just been introduced to the apologetics of presuppositionalism. This thread, or more particularly, some arguments in this thread, do seem to follow a presupposiotnalist rationale. Basically, (and I'm a novice in understanding this) presuppositionalists would say that logic is embedded in the notion of a God, in particular the Christian God. Instead of arguing for this, they say that this presupposition is the only one that leads to a coherent world view. They would tend to argue that any other point of view leads to inconsistencies. The same approach is used with morality and knowledge. These three foundations are part of the Transcendental Argument for God. Any presuppositionalists feel free to correct my errors in understanding.
Further reading, including some critiques of presuppositionalism can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transce...istence_of_God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presupp...al_apologetics
http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/...positionalism/
http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/...positionalism/
-
March 26th 2012, 11:08 PM #416
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - Apophatic
-
March 26th 2012, 11:15 PM #417
-
March 26th 2012, 11:18 PM #418
-
March 26th 2012, 11:24 PM #419
-
March 26th 2012, 11:27 PM #420
- Join Date
- December 30th, 2009
- Posts
- 6,095
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
Male - Apophatic
Similar Threads
-
For FS: Evidence of god's existence.
By AtheistArchon in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 115Last Post: March 26th 2012, 11:47 PM -
Are God's Laws actually valid?
By Spacefoetus in forum Biblical EthicsReplies: 12Last Post: January 26th 2009, 04:54 PM -
Can god account for the laws of logic?
By Virgil in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 4Last Post: September 4th 2008, 06:20 AM -
What constitutes reasonable evidence for God's existence or non-existence?
By ScottM in forum Philosophy 201Replies: 158Last Post: September 27th 2007, 12:54 PM -
From God's inexistence it follows God's existence
By irichc in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 17Last Post: August 17th 2004, 08:41 PM
















































































Quote


Is Pope Francis preaching...
Yesterday, 10:30 PM in Ecclesiology 201