Originally posted by Meh Gerbil
View Post
I have plenty of problems with the Washington Post. They turned into neo-cons a couple of decades ago, and cheerled for the Iraq War, and cheerled for more war with their favorite neo-con Hillary Clinton more recently. The moment Sanders looked like he would pass Clinton in the polls, the Washington Post responded by publishing 16 negative articles about Sanders in 16 hours. Their opinion pieces are generally written by D.C. insiders with their heads so far up their own rear ends that they can see daylight out the top.
All that said, their news articles rather than opinion pieces are generally pretty good, well-researched, and accurate. They seem to have a decent investigative journalism team, which is unusual these days.
In short, they're about 1000 times more believable and accurate than your posts.
And, again, Mika and Joe wrote this piece so it's their words (even to the point where WaPo didn't correct their grammar errors it seems?), which is what's relevant here.
Comment