Thread: Limits of Biological Change
-
February 22nd 2012, 12:59 AM #16
Re: Limits of Biological Change
Dropped is too light a word. "Thrown" is much more fitting.
O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams.
-
February 22nd 2012, 04:12 AM #17
-
February 22nd 2012, 12:31 PM #18
-
February 22nd 2012, 12:33 PM #19
Re: Limits of Biological Change
"Let the hand not say to the foot - I have no need of thee ..."
"I assume you have prepared new insults for me today ..."
- Spock (the younger)
-
February 22nd 2012, 11:51 PM #20
Re: Limits of Biological Change
1. Dinosaurs
2. From their parents who would have been dinosaurs
3. They went extinct.
4. Favourable conditions.
Hmm, there are ants in my kitchen cupboard.
I've never seen ants in my kitchen before.
I've seen a few flies in here.
The flies must have turned into ants.
The thread topic is about whether there are biological limits to change.
I suggest that the evidence speaks for itself - we just don't see one animal changing into another type of animal.
For that I get abused and humiliated.
Sure are some insecure people in TWEB.
Magellan
-
February 23rd 2012, 12:07 AM #21
Re: Limits of Biological Change
This would be great,except the evidence suggests that this is constantly happening, everywhere, always has been and always will be. But when evidence refutes ideology we get clowns.I suggest that the evidence speaks for itself - we just don't see one animal changing into another type of animal.
-
February 23rd 2012, 01:09 AM #22
Re: Limits of Biological Change
Only if you limit yourself to real time, eyewitness evidence. Sadly for you Clownshoes, we have over 3 billion years' worth of other evidence, including 600+ million years' worth of multi-cellular animal fossils.
No, you get abused and humiliated for being a trolling idiot instead of an honest contributor. Why you choose that path is known only to you.For that I get abused and humiliated.
- T"First understand, then criticize! Not the other way round." - Per Ahlberg, TR
Jorge Stock Excuse Quick Reference Guide:
1) You're drunk / high on drugs
2) You're too stupid / ignorant / dishonest to understand
3) Explaining is a waste of time
4) This assertion is true because I said so
5) This assertion is even truer because I said so twice
6) I already provided evidence (in huge detail) but I won't repeat it or link to it.
-
February 23rd 2012, 04:51 AM #23
Re: Limits of Biological Change
You went up in my estimation when I saw the gang attacking you. At least you make a stand.
Of course you have to lash out at others because you hate ideas that conflict with your own. I hope one day you will see that that is a waste of your energy. In the meantime you'll 'Do unto others as they do unto you.'
Anyway - back to the issue.
1. Is there a limit?
2. Person A. 'Yes there is - what we see shows the limit.'
3. Person B. ' 'No , what we see shows no limit.'
Well Person B is not really doing anything except denying and opposing. So what?
Magellan
-
February 23rd 2012, 03:03 PM #24
-
February 23rd 2012, 03:14 PM #25
Re: Limits of Biological Change
Sorry. Couldn't resist
Always strive to keep an open mind – but not so open that your brains fall out!Still afeared of & dodging The PINTM
Similar Threads
-
Salvation is psychological, not biological.
By UrbanMonk in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 35Last Post: August 15th 2009, 10:03 PM -
Biological Robots?
By seer in forum Philosophy 201Replies: 96Last Post: January 6th 2009, 07:16 AM -
What would falsify Biological Evolution
By burgy in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 18Last Post: October 9th 2008, 03:59 PM -
Jesus And His Biological Brother(s)
By Minnesota in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 25Last Post: May 3rd 2006, 06:06 PM -
Non-biological evolution
By TenDimensions in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 2Last Post: April 7th 2003, 11:20 AM















































































Quote




Dawkins exemplifies Atheists - for...
Today, 08:03 AM in Natural Science 301