Macro Evolution: The Evidence

[Xru]

But to what do you attribute Hitler?

Hey Ansgar . . . how do you rate curious by your avatar and I get Twisted?

As far as Hitler goes I just wanted to be the first to bring him up;)

[Ansgar Seraph]

Hey Ansgar . . . how do you rate curious by your avatar and I get Twisted?

As far as Hitler goes I just wanted to be the first to bring him up;)

It's Hitlers all the way down!

Um, I just set mine to that mood. Did someone change your mood for you? There's been shenanigans, I hear.

[Xru]

Oh . . . Probably Sparko. He likes to abuse his admin priv's, ha ha.

[KingsGambit]

Oh . . . Probably Sparko. He likes to abuse his admin priv's, ha ha.

Anybody can change anybody's mood, not just admins.

[Xru]

oh okay. How do we do that?

Oh okay. I'm definitely angelic.

[magellan004]

Attachment 77714

Abstracts to scientific papers discussing the topic are generally considered pretty good references.

By you.
Arguing by link is generally considered to disguise a feeble argument.

Magellan

[Cerebrum123]

But to what do you attribute Hitler?

You should KNOW that he is a product of ToE.

[rogue06]

By you.
Arguing by link is generally considered to disguise a feeble argument.

Magellan

Didn't you ask for references? And when supplied now try to dismiss them as arguing by link


m004.jpg
clown.jpg
There is a reason you have
this reputation you know

[rogue06]

You should KNOW that he is a product of ToE.

296lwdt.jpg

[Cerebrum123]

296lwdt.jpg

[lao tzu]

But to what do you attribute Hitler?

kitler7424.jpg

It's evolution, baby.

[rogue06]

kitler7424.jpg

It's evolution, baby.

That picture will sure make the führer fly.

[Roy]

I looked at three of the so-called articles in Pancreasman's so-called list of references . They were abstracts! LOL.

:facepalm:

Roy

[pancreasman]

lol.. You're funny.

You've actually clicked the link now. Good for you!

From just one article, did you know there are quite a few species of Staphylococci? Did you know that if you go to the doctor with an infection, he will send away a sample so that its species may be determined so that he can prescribe the most effective treatment? Do you know this determination is made by an examination of key factors? It's pretty complex microbiology but I'm sure it will be no trouble for a person of your obvious scientific ability. The full article is available here:

http://jcm.asm.org/content/1/1/82.full.pdf+html

This of course means your claim that distinguishing different species is just 'a judgement call'. Either explain why these are not tests or admit you misspoke. You'll do neither naturally.

Magellan

Perhaps you see now why people are reluctant to waste time talking to you. You complained I only pointed you to abstracts outlining tests of speciation you claimed did not exist. I took the time to choose one full paper from the list explaining how microbiologists apply empirical tests to determine species of staphylococci. I asked you to explain why this one paper (out of the hundreds listed) does not disprove your assertion that there is no test for species.

You have had plenty of opportunity to reply but you have chosen instead to make the citing of abstracts your 'new' complaint. Can you not see how this calls into question (yet again) your intellectual integrity?

[magellan004]

Didn't you ask for references? And when supplied now try to dismiss them as arguing by link

There is a reason you have
this reputation you know

No I didn't.
There is a reason you have a reputation as a misrepresenter of other people's arguments.

Do the hard work. Use quotes in context. Give outlines with links that relate to the matter at hand. Your outline should, hopefully, show that the link does indeed address the issue.
A list of Google Scholar links - that end up being truncated abstracts only establishes that the person using Google is out of their depth.

But all that aside - give it up. You can't support Evolution without being hypocritical.
Let's all agree that Evolution is popular, politically safe, a hit with the pop-media and is not very scientific. Then we can all be happy.

Magellan