Jesus questions for mormons

[nrajeff]

I don't boss my family around Jeff, you really need to grow up and stop acting like a little kid. At this point, you remind me of a whiny 14 year old who is crying because somebody called him a mean name on the internet. Seriously, is that all it takes for you to get all angry? Wow... I really would hate to see what would happen if you ran into something serious...

I see that as you expressing an opinion based on extremely limited information, and I know it's not true, so it doesn't really bother me.

[lilpixieofterror]

I see that as you expressing an opinion based on extremely limited information, and I know it's not true, so it doesn't really bother me.

No I am not Jeff. I read these threads and see that you are acting like a drama queen.

[Cow Poke]

I see that as you expressing an opinion based on extremely limited information, and I know it's not true, so it doesn't really bother me.

If ONLY that you were sincere, we wouldn't have to read post after post of complaining!

[nrajeff]

Honestly, Jeff, I don't see that as a personal attack. :

Then we may have identified the problem here: Your definition of "personal attack" is unrealistic and non-normative. I think most people would agree with me that insults that imply that another person is stupid, a jerk, a moron, childish, etc. are personal attacks, since they are attacks of a personal nature.

Under that definition, I am guilty of making personal attacks as well as the rest of you, since using them back at a person who made them at you first, still counts as a personal attack:

Generally, name-calling of any kind is an ad hominem. Additionally, saying that the other person is ignorant, stupid, or such will also almost always be an ad hominem.

http://onlinephilosophyclub.com/foru...opic.php?t=398

A personal attack is a derogatory statement or statements directed at a specific poster. Derogatory statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
*****Negative remarks about a person' intelligence, e.g. IQ level, reading comprehension ability; use of the words retard, stupid, dumb and similar; asking their grade in school
*****Negative remarks about a person's physical or psychiatric health, e.g. accusing a member of senility; needing/forgetting psychiatric medications; making psychiatric diagnosis such as paranoid, bi-polar and the like; suggesting a member needs psychiatric help
*****Negative remarks impugning a member's character or morals

.......
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/about...#ixzz1z6Cd7mq5

[nrajeff]

No I am not Jeff. I read these threads and see that you are acting like a drama queen.

And I see that you are acting like a rabid lesbian. What's the score now? You're still ahead in insults, right?

[nrajeff]

So why are you not following the bible's "version" of it, Jeff?

Why aren't you?

[nrajeff]

Actually, he's more like a five year old.

"Actually" you're more like a 1-year-old. How long do want to keep escalating the insult game? Do you think you are doing the forum any good?

[Cow Poke]

Then we may have identified the problem here: Your definition of "personal attack" is unrealistic and non-normative. I think most people would agree with me that insults that imply that another person is stupid, a jerk, a moron, childish, etc. are personal attacks, since they are attacks of a personal nature.

Under that definition, I am guilty of making personal attacks as well as the rest of you, since using them back at a person who made them at you first, still counts as a personal attack:

Generally, name-calling of any kind is an ad hominem. Additionally, saying that the other person is ignorant, stupid, or such will also almost always be an ad hominem.

http://onlinephilosophyclub.com/foru...opic.php?t=398

A personal attack is a derogatory statement or statements directed at a specific poster. Derogatory statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
*****Negative remarks about a person' intelligence, e.g. IQ level, reading comprehension ability; use of the words retard, stupid, dumb and similar; asking their grade in school
*****Negative remarks about a person's physical or psychiatric health, e.g. accusing a member of senility; needing/forgetting psychiatric medications; making psychiatric diagnosis such as paranoid, bi-polar and the like; suggesting a member needs psychiatric help
*****Negative remarks impugning a member's character or morals

.......
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/about...#ixzz1z6Cd7mq5

DRAMA QUEEN:

Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary

drama queen noun
plural ∼ queens
[count] disapproving : a person (especially a woman) who acts as though things are much worse than they really are

© source where applicable

[Cow Poke]

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/about...#ixzz1z6Cd7mq5

[lilpixieofterror]

And I see that you are acting like a rabid lesbian.

And are you the expert in how 'rabid lesbians' act now? Is there something you're not telling us?

What's the score now? You're still ahead in insults, right?

Nah Jeff, you are being a drama queen. It isn't an insult, it is a fact and a fact you keep proving the more you whine, complain, and throw a fit about every little perceived slight you see. Then again as I've heard before:

Fools show their annoyance at once, but the prudent overlook an insult.
Proverbs 12:16 NIV

[lilpixieofterror]

What is really entertaining is that the majority of people on that forum do not think any of that stuff is an ad hominem either. Perhaps Jeff should try to actually read a bit further instead of just quickly glancing without reading.

[Cerebrum123]

"Actually" you're more like a 1-year-old. How long do want to keep escalating the insult game? Do you think you are doing the forum any good?

How about you practice what you say we are NOT doing, you know, not insulting other people. You get all upset about very very small things that actually are exceedingly mild(the worst thing I have seen you called on here was moron), yet you go and insult people as being homosexual. Maybe if you weren't so hypocritical in this matter, then you wouldn't be getting so much flak.

[Cow Poke]

How about you practice what you say we are NOT doing, you know, not insulting other people. You get all upset about very very small things that actually are exceedingly mild(the worst thing I have seen you called on here was moron), yet you go and insult people as being homosexual. Maybe if you weren't so hypocritical in this matter, then you wouldn't be getting so much flak.

And I officially apologize for calling Jeff a Moron. He is obviously NOT a moron in the actual definition of the term. He's a very intelligent guy who, IMO, can act rather childishly at times, as can we all. And, just to be clear, this apology includes "freakin' Moron" as well.

[Cerebrum123]

And I officially apologize for calling Jeff a Moron. He is obviously NOT a moron in the actual definition of the term. He's a very intelligent guy who, IMO, can act rather childishly at times, as can we all. And, just to be clear, this apology includes "freakin' Moron" as well.

Yeah, and if sarcastically agreeing that you don't seem to have a clue was so hurtful, then I am sorry, how about we try again?

[nrajeff]

What is really entertaining is that the majority of people on that forum do not think any of that stuff is an ad hominem either.

It's just sad, if that many people, with consciences that seared, are concentrated into one forum. It's not entertaining at all, except to people who feel the need to stoop that low to find entertainment.