Re: We need advice from smart/married people!
Originally posted by Little Shepherd
Certain modern hang-ups really annoy me. Yes, there should be clear boundaries, but there's no reason to think that living with RG's mom is going to be some kind of disaster waiting to happen. Quanta's family is big and loud, and she's introverted and likes more quiet. If she has her space and RG's mom isn't all loud and whatnot, it shouldn't be any worse than her other flat-mate experiences. The whole "you gotta be alone" and "the mother-in-law is the devil" things are modern, largely western(and even then not throughout all the west) views that just don't line up with the experiences and practices of the vast majority of civilizations throughout human history.
Live with the mum-in-law. Don't go into it expecting it to be a disaster. And yeah, expect some adjustment and some need for boundary setting. You can always move out later if you really have to, but it will in most likelihood be fine.
It depends on the personalities involved. My wife had to make a conscious effort to stop running to her mother and start running to me. It was an issue between us for a while, and we didn't even live with her parents. I know my parents had a similar experience. It's something to consider, but not something to freak out about.
You also have to remember that other cultures differ fundamentally in important ways. First, it was normal/expected for one married couple to live in the same house as the parents. This still happens, but not very often in America. Second, children were raised to be adults. They were given chores that were their responsibility, and they would be married at a young age. Once upon a time, 16 was old. Now, late 20s and early 30s is the norm. Many women (and men) do not 'break' from their families until this time, making the predisposition to 'run to mommy' even worse. So yes, while this issue is often overstated, claiming that other civilizations didn't have this problem isn't really relevant.
Having said that, I'm sure Quanta and RG will do fine living with his mother. They (You) both seem to have your head on straight and are considering the issues intelligently. Good for you!
Originally posted by Little Shepherd
2. They get married sooner. Quanta moves to England. RG finishes his degrees. They move back to the States when they can. Since you can't always plan for this kind of thing, kids may have appeared by this point. I'm sure Quanta can get the raw skills necessary for her desired profession, but the other benefits of her potential degree(higher asking price for her work, good references, and whatnot) should be seriously considered here. Fitting the degree in may not be feasible at this point depending on their specific situation, too, so there's no guarantee there will even be a choice at this point.
My vote is for this. RG, it's already been mentioned, but I strongly suggest looking at job prospects in the US before deciding on a final degree plan. It may be that talking to people experienced in the field can help you narrow down a field that will accommodate both your desires and a realistic job prospect.
Know that getting married can make schooling harder, but it doesn't have to be that way. I've known a few couples that make it work well.
Congratulations to you both!
ETA: Just wanted to reiterate what Jaltus said about finances. There is no perfect time to get married, have children or buy a house. There's always somewhere for the money to go.
What the world thinks the most valuable exhibition of the Dao is to be found in books. But books are only a collection of words. Words have what is valuable in them - what is valuable in words is the ideas they convey. But those ideas are a sequence of something else - and what that something else is cannot be conveyed by words. When the world, because of the value which it attaches to words, commits them to books, that for which it so values them may not deserve to be valued - because that which it values is not what is really valuable. Thus it is that what we look at and can see is (only) the outward form and colour, and what we listen to and can hear is (only) names and sounds. Alas! that men of the world should think that form and colour, name and sound, should be sufficient to give them the real nature of the Dao. The form and colour, the name and sound, are certainly not sufficient to convey its real nature; and so it is that 'the wise do not speak and those who do speak are not wise.' How should the world know that real nature?
--Zuangzi, Way of Heaven
Rip BSA
Yesterday, 08:29 PM in Civics 101