Announcement

Collapse

Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines

Theists only.

This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.

The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.

The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."

The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

What Jesus Really Meant (IMO)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Jesus Really Meant (IMO)

    Hello Everyone -

    I would like to share the (just completed, pdf format, 23 pages) first chapter of my treatise, titled "What Jesus Really Meant" with readers who may be interested in it. Commentary, whether supportive or critical, is welcome as it would help guide my formulation of future chapters - three in all are planned - and will be made available online for free (IOW, this is not a 'money making' ventrue on my part).

    Clicking on the link below will bring up a page at sendspace.com with a download button on it. You do not have to create and account and sign in to download the document - open with adobe reader or save to download folder options come up when the download button is clicked.

    Moderated By: ke7ejx

    No advertising allowed.

    ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
    Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Padded Room unless told otherwise.



    The document has embedded links. Clicking on my name on the title page will take you the home page of my website if you want more information about me.

    Caveat to anyone who self-identifies as 'Christian': my take on Jesus and his God-and-world view is quite NON-traditional.
    Last edited by ke7ejx; 07-16-2017, 12:21 PM.

  • #2
    P.S. I just received a 'warning' from one of the admins saying that this is a discussion site and that advertising blogs or published works are not permitted. I just want to say that the chapter I mentioned and invited folks to read has not been 'published' in any normal sense. I am engaged in discussions on several forums regarding the matters addressed therein (as well as other matters pertaining to theology, religion, spiritualiity, spiritual development, in general). This piece is simply a 'bringing together into one place' of a bunch of connected ideas (and opinions, in this case mine) pertaining to such subjects, which I hope folks find worth thinking about and possibly integrating partly or wholly into their world-views. Of course, I would be very much interested in engaging in discussions about them if, as I hope, others here find them worth discussing. My simply initially offering what amounts to an 'essay' as possibly interesting reading material is a function of my not knowing whether or not people will find the ideas and opinions expressed therein meaningfully exciting enough to want to engage in conversationally bouncing around and exploring. As implied in my OP, such converseation would also serve to excite and focus me on developing other (related) ideas further - the ones which are presently just subliminally rambling around in the back of my mind, occasionally surfacing into consciousness, as I continue contemplating the 'river of Life' we are all paddling about in.

    Sincerely - David :)
    Last edited by davidsun; 07-15-2017, 12:47 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      You are not allowed to post links of that sort regardless.
      Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
        You are not allowed to post links of that sort regardless.
        And yet the admins have not removed it, despite the "warning."
        Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

        Beige Federalist.

        Nationalist Christian.

        "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

        Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

        Proud member of the this space left blank community.

        Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.

        Justice for Ashli Babbitt!

        Justice for Matthew Perna!

        Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
          And yet the admins have not removed it, despite the "warning."
          Probably because different moderators are responsible for different parts of the board, and they attempt not to step on each other's toes. So they may offer a general warning, but wait for the mod responsible for the section to step in to actually edit the post.

          Added factors include that mods often discuss infractions with one another even if something occurs in their area, and also mods of a particular area may not be aware of every single infraction because they haven't logged in yet.

          It's pretty bureaucratic really, and honestly some things could probably be nipped in the bud quicker than others by just going ahead and taking care of things for mods that are not available, but it's an attempt to make sure that everything is done as carefully and as fair as possible. The forum that this forum spawned from was/is notorious for mods that were ruthless in their behavior, and quickness in giving infractions and banning people. This forum was set up to get away from that sort of system of rule.

          And, well, it's all volunteer work after all, so they're doing the best they can.

          Comment


          • #6
            Oh dear it's one of THOSE treatises.
            1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
            .
            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
            Scripture before Tradition:
            but that won't prevent others from
            taking it upon themselves to deprive you
            of the right to call yourself Christian.

            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
              And yet the admins have not removed it, despite the "warning."
              Now it has.
              I am Punkinhead.

              "I have missed you, Oh Grand High Priestess of the Order of the Stirring Pot"

              ~ Cow Poke aka CP aka Creacher aka ke7ejx's apprentice....

              Comment


              • #8
                Discussion in relation to any aspect of what follows is invited and very welcome:

                From his saying “This is my body” when breaking bread and “This is my blood” when pouring wine at what has since been referenced as The Last Supper with his disciples (see Matthew 26), it is clear that Jesus rationally grasped as well as mystically (that is, transpersonally) identified with the Oneness of Creation. If what he meant to communicate by way of such sayings had been truly apprehended, such utterances may indeed have been**foundational in establishing an ecologically sane, holistically Life-augmentative civilization.

                That was not to be the case, however. Because the beliefs of most if not all of those around him at the time were hypnotically rooted in projections that God (to wit, the progenitive Source and Sustainer of Life) was a singular, supremely dictatorial ruler who had especially favored mankind by ‘giving’ them ‘dominion’ over all other earthly creatures (see Genesis 1:26-28), analogous to the way kings of old ‘granted’ lords of old the right to govern less powerful folk living in their territories (as long as said lords remained loyally subservient in relation to said kings, of course), the people around him simply did not register and so could not even begin to comprehend the implications of the fact that such sayings by Jesus actually referenced the matrixial interconnectedness and interdependency of all being.

                About his Sonship:

                Making matters worse, as they then also construed his references to being “the Son of God” literally, instead of ‘remembering’ the factuality of above-referenced Oneness of Being as they were directed to (in Luke 22), when would-be followers subsequently gathered together for a ceremonial meal of bread and wine (which observance later became ritualized as The Sacrament of Holy Communion), they just imagined and believed the bread and wine to be miraculously transformed (literally transubstantiated!) into the flesh and blood of Jesus himself* who they idolized and proceeded to worship and pledge allegiance to as the “King of kings and Lord of lords” (I Timothy 6:15‑16) heir of said ‘supreme’ God.

                [*Though such belief and practice is generally, presently at least, simply accepted without significant thought, question or discussion as ‘normal’, it generated quite a bit of controversy when the movement now known as ‘Christianity’ was just getting started as a result of its connoting a kind of cannibalism. Presumably, what is called ‘magical thinking’ (nowadays) led members of the movement to suppose that such ingestion would result in their physically ‘absorbing’ Jesus’ spiritual characteristics and thereby attain personal ‘communion’ with him.]

                What anyone thinks Jesus really meant when he used such and related phrases and why he or she imagines he chose to speak of God as ‘the Father’ and himself as ‘the Son’ (of said Father) will, of course, depend on his or her personal apprehension and understanding of metaphysical realities and ‘sense’ of what the mind-and-heart sets of the people around Jesus were like at the time. My own conclusions in this regard, which I proffer for consideration and contemplation, are that he used ‘the Father’ to reference the progenitive Source (hence, ‘the Creator’) of all existential being, and ‘the Son’ to reference the totality of said Creator’s Creation (d/b/a Creativity), in other words the Entity of Life as It exists and continues to express Itself in Being.
                Last edited by davidsun; 07-16-2017, 08:55 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  P.S. Anyone wishing to receive and relate to the entirety of my above-referenced thesis in one fell swoop is invited contact me via email or PM - assuming my sharing the document or how to gain access to it that way won't violate forum policy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by davidsun View Post
                    P.S. Anyone wishing to receive and relate to the entirety of my above-referenced thesis in one fell swoop is invited contact me via email or PM - assuming my sharing the document or how to gain access to it that way won't violate forum policy.
                    When you have enough posts (20-25 IIRC) you can have a signature where you can put a link to your blog.

                    I'm always still in trouble again

                    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This may seem radical, but what if Jesus meant exactly what He said?
                      Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by davidsun View Post
                        Discussion in relation to any aspect of what follows is invited and very welcome:

                        From his saying “This is my body” when breaking bread and “This is my blood” when pouring wine at what has since been referenced as The Last Supper with his disciples (see Matthew 26), it is clear that Jesus rationally grasped as well as mystically (that is, transpersonally) identified with the Oneness of Creation. If what he meant to communicate by way of such sayings had been truly apprehended, such utterances may indeed have been**foundational in establishing an ecologically sane, holistically Life-augmentative civilization.
                        Deh. Were the quote to be considered in its entirety, there would be no way to make the claim. Considering half a quote (which is to say, taking it out of context), this and a host of other quotes can be wrested.

                        That was not to be the case, however. Because the beliefs of most if not all of those around him at the time were hypnotically rooted in projections that God (to wit, the progenitive Source and Sustainer of Life) was a singular, supremely dictatorial ruler who had especially favored mankind by ‘giving’ them ‘dominion’ over all other earthly creatures (see Genesis 1:26-28), analogous to the way kings of old ‘granted’ lords of old the right to govern less powerful folk living in their territories (as long as said lords remained loyally subservient in relation to said kings, of course), the people around him simply did not register and so could not even begin to comprehend the implications of the fact that such sayings by Jesus actually referenced the matrixial interconnectedness and interdependency of all being.
                        The people who made such claims about God were, by and large, prophets. I'll take such claims as being more adequate than I will the claims of people who aren't prophesying.

                        About his Sonship:

                        Making matters worse, as they then also construed his references to being “the Son of God” literally, instead of ‘remembering’ the factuality of above-referenced Oneness of Being as they were directed to (in Luke 22), when would-be followers subsequently gathered together for a ceremonial meal of bread and wine (which observance later became ritualized as The Sacrament of Holy Communion), they just imagined and believed the bread and wine to be miraculously transformed (literally transubstantiated!) into the flesh and blood of Jesus himself* who they idolized and proceeded to worship and pledge allegiance to as the “King of kings and Lord of lords” (I Timothy 6:15‑16) heir of said ‘supreme’ God.

                        [*Though such belief and practice is generally, presently at least, simply accepted without significant thought, question or discussion as ‘normal’, it generated quite a bit of controversy when the movement now known as ‘Christianity’ was just getting started as a result of its connoting a kind of cannibalism.
                        Such was the presumption of outsiders. The founding apostles made no such claim; nor did disciples generally.

                        Presumably, what is called ‘magical thinking’ (nowadays) led members of the movement to suppose that such ingestion would result in their physically ‘absorbing’ Jesus’ spiritual characteristics and thereby attain personal ‘communion’ with him.
                        Hardly. The process of absorption was not taught, and the personal communion with Christ is predicated upon obedience.

                        What anyone thinks Jesus really meant when he used such and related phrases and why he or she imagines he chose to speak of God as ‘the Father’ and himself as ‘the Son’ (of said Father) will, of course, depend on his or her personal apprehension and understanding of metaphysical realities and ‘sense’ of what the mind-and-heart sets of the people around Jesus were like at the time. My own conclusions in this regard, which I proffer for consideration and contemplation, are that he used ‘the Father’ to reference the progenitive Source (hence, ‘the Creator’) of all existential being, and ‘the Son’ to reference the totality of said Creator’s Creation (d/b/a Creativity), in other words the Entity of Life as It exists and continues to express Itself in Being.
                        Jesus himself made it clear that what he said was what he meant. His relationship to the father was that of a loyal and obedient son.
                        Last edited by tabibito; 07-17-2017, 01:37 AM.
                        1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                        .
                        ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                        Scripture before Tradition:
                        but that won't prevent others from
                        taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                        of the right to call yourself Christian.

                        ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
                          This may seem radical, but what if Jesus meant exactly what He said?
                          there'd be no money in that.
                          1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                          .
                          ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                          Scripture before Tradition:
                          but that won't prevent others from
                          taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                          of the right to call yourself Christian.

                          ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
                            This may seem radical, but what if Jesus meant exactly what He said?
                            unpossible!! He has to have secret meanings that only the specially blessed can understand!!! That way they can know they are the chosen ones and God likes them better than everyone else. duh.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                              When you have enough posts (20-25 IIRC) you can have a signature where you can put a link to your blog.
                              Thanks for the info. Still a newbie learning the ropes.

                              Comment

                              widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                              Working...
                              X