Announcement

Collapse

Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines

Theists only.

This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.

The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.

The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."

The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

What Jesus Really Meant (IMO)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
    This may seem radical, but what if Jesus meant exactly what He said?
    Exactly! The thing of it is that he spoke using metaphors - as, if and when I say "I am doing 'great'" it doesn't mean I am doing 'big' things! Hence the need for intelligence to be capable of more than 'simple' literal interpretations. Of course, if you think that, "they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" for instance really means that Jesus himself will appear in the sky and orbit the earth," that's your choicethenot mean that he will then literallyin person. People who are emotionally invested in worshiping Jesus himself as a super-magical genie kind of God will undoubtedly regard the explanation that follows as being unacceptably heretical, but assuming you are notonly makes real sense [u]if[/i] one interprets it metaphorically
    Last edited by davidsun; 07-17-2017, 11:23 AM.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by tabibito View Post
      Deh. Were the quote [about "This my blood" etc.] to be considered in its entirety, there would be no way to make the claim. Considering half a quote (which is to say, taking it out of context), this and a host of other quotes can be wrested.
      Please do present and discuss your interpretation of "the quote" in its entirety, so I may know what you are talking about.

      I register the rest of your claims to understand the reality pertaining to Jesus, prophets, etc. I appreciate your sharing your contrasting views here. I obviously do not agree with them, however, as I present alternate views which I personally believe are more reality-oriented.
      Last edited by davidsun; 07-17-2017, 11:34 AM.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        there'd be no money in that.
        You seem to be implying that people who think differently than you do are 'in it' for the 'money'? What if they aren't ? I certainly am not! Have you considered the implications of that?

        Comment


        • #19
          You reply to "This may seem radical, but what if Jesus meant exactly what He said?" Sparko, to wit:

          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
          unpossible!! He has to have secret meanings that only the specially blessed can understand!!! That way they can know they are the chosen ones and God likes them better than everyone else. duh.

          Comment


          • #20
            Thanking everyone for their responses, and picking up at the bottom of and continuing the text of my treatise (from post #8):

            thetotalitypresently, I submit, those who mostmuch more likelyholisticHolistically co-relative insofarselfishness. This applies, to one degree or another, to everyholistic really have nothing more to learn and developmentally accomplish by way of incarnating as a personal-selfexceptionalothersmust eitherselfish instincts and becoming more integrally related to others or spiritually regress and possibly even disintegrate (i.e.

            Comment


            • #21
              so you are saying that you are twisting the words of Jesus to catch more birds?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                so you are saying that you are twisting the words of Jesus to catch more birds?
                No. Following the parable in question, I said: "(Note: even this parablemy interpretation (and claiming it to be no more and no less) of the words of Jesus as presented in the King James translation. Methinks, the notion that I am 'twisting' them is your ('twisted'? ) idea.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by davidsun View Post
                  No. Following the parable in question, I said: "(Note: even this parablemy interpretation (and claiming it to be no more and no less) of the words of Jesus as presented in the King James translation. Methinks, the notion that I am 'twisting' them is your ('twisted'? )

                  idea.
                  oh. so you are saying that JESUS was the bird catcher who was tricking people then?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by davidsun View Post
                    Thanking everyone for their responses, and picking up at the bottom of and continuing the text of my treatise (from post #8):

                    thetotalitypresently, I submit, those who mostmuch more likelyholisticHolistically co-relative insofarselfishness. This applies, to one degree or another, to everyholistic really have nothing more to learn and developmentally accomplish by way of incarnating as a personal-selfexceptionalothersmust eitherselfish instincts and becoming more integrally related to others or spiritually regress and possibly even disintegrate (i.e.
                    Oh! So you are ? Why didn't you just say so?

                    You fit right in.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                      oh. so you are saying that JESUS was the bird catcher who was tricking people then?
                      No. The people who interpret his teachings literally, without really undertstanding them, are the 'parrots' - who enlist more 'parrots' and catch and exploit even 'dumber' 'birds' with their help - are the ones doing that 'tricking'. In my book, Godspeak 2000 (available as a free download from my website), I referenced the same kind of phenomenon in relation to astrology/astrologers
                      Last edited by davidsun; 07-17-2017, 08:52 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by davidsun View Post
                        No. The people who interpret his teachings literally, without really undertstanding them, are the 'parrots' - who enlist more 'parrots' and catch and exploit even 'dumber' 'birds' with their help - are the ones doing that 'tricking'. In my book, Godspeak 2000 (available as a free download from my website), I referenced the same kind of phenomenon in relation to astrology/astrologers
                        Nobody thinks Jesus was speaking literally when he was telling parables. But his meaning was pretty clear, not some esoteric nonsense that took 2000 years until someone like you to come along and figure it out. You are not that special Dave. You are nuts.

                        Let's discuss one and see. Bring forth a parable of Jesus that you claim you know what he was really saying and let's see. Post the parable and your interpretation.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                          Nobody thinks Jesus was speaking literally when he was telling parables. But his meaning was pretty clear, not some esoteric nonsense that took 2000 years until someone like you to come along and figure it out. You are not that special Dave. You are nuts.

                          Let's discuss one and see. Bring forth a parable of Jesus that you claim you know what he was really saying and let's see. Post the parable and your interpretation.
                          Yes, I agree that there have been a fair number of folks who have IMO 'correctly' (metaphorically) interpreted and understood) what he meant to communicate by way of his parabolic' sayings, including his speaking of 'God' as being 'his' Father. I don't think I am 'special' in this regard. But relatively few (as far as I know) have attempted to 'set 'the record' straight, so to speak, by speaking of and to 'followers' who accept and buy into 'narrow-minded' 'self-serving' (letter of 'the word', instead of spirit of 'the word') interpretations thereof, just as there are relatively few 'Muslims' who expose and stand up to 'narrow-minded' 'self-serving' interpretations of the thangs Mohammad said - the same being true in my opinion 'in' every 'group' (category) of people in the world, I think - presumably because it suited them to not do so, the result being that people hewing to 'narrow-minded' 'self-serving' interpretations have been 'allowed' to spew and do dastardly 'stuff' to others (in particular) and humanity and our world (in general), in my opinion. Stay tuned for more of my 'metaphorical' interpretations - lets both 'see' if you do or don't acknowledge their validity, shall we?

                          Repeating the last couple of paragraphs of the prior excerpt as shared in post #20 (for context) and continuing on from there:

                          Edited by a Moderator
                          More to come
                          Last edited by ke7ejx; 07-18-2017, 02:58 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            That's what
                            - She

                            Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
                            - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

                            I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
                            - Stephen R. Donaldson

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Edited by a Moderator
                              Originally posted by davidsun View Post

                              More to come
                              no 'more to come.' This isn't your blog site. This is a discussion site.

                              Either discuss or leave.

                              Now present a parable, then give us your interpretation. We can discuss. Don't just keep spamming your book. We unfortunately had to end up banning another member who would not obey the rules and kept spamming his blog.

                              Rules:


                              Advertising
                              Do not post on the board, in Private Message or email any content that are primarily intended for self-promotion or the advertising of any product, website, business, ministry, event or other entities (whether or not such advertising is for free resources) such as a website link without prior consent of a Moderator or Administrator. Advertisements such as a website link including a brief description are welcome in the Campus Life section personal profiles, journals and signature lines as long as they comply with the rules of the site. Whether or not a post is intended as advertisement is solely at the discretion of the moderators. If you are unsure, please contact an area moderator prior to posting.

                              Post Length Considerations
                              The maximum post length is 24K characters not including quoted material. Do not use multiple posts to circumvent this restriction. Please keep your points concise and limit the number of major points made in a debate/discussion to 1 or 2 per post max as this encourages discourse. Rebuttal posts get undesirably lengthy from both a writer's and a reader's perspective when there are too many points to address. Additionally, please allow the other person to respond to your post before making additional substantive posts and points directed towards that same person (i.e. back-to-back responses to a single post are not allowed.)
                              Last edited by ke7ejx; 07-18-2017, 02:59 PM.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by Larry Serflaten, 01-25-2024, 09:30 AM
                              432 responses
                              1,976 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Working...
                              X