Thread: Historians all agree...
-
July 12th 2012, 06:14 AM #1
Historians all agree...
The way people behaved after the resurrection is a strong indicator of its validity. No one (at least no one sane) is willing to die for something (the resurrection) they know is untrue.
http://stayintheconversation.org/rzi...from-the-dead/Human embryos are living human beings precisely because they possess the single defining feature of human life that is lost in the moment of death—the ability to function as a coordinated organism rather than merely as a group of living human cells. Maureen L. Condic (Click Here)Government by the people is always preferable to government by the judiciary. Brian Fahling Senior trial attorney for the Center for Law & PolicyThe philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next. Abraham LincolnUnless you say, "Yes, I'm a sinner who needs forgiveness" and accept God's free gift of salvation, your answer is "No" by default. We report, you decide.
-
July 12th 2012, 06:16 AM #2
Re: Historians all agree...
-
July 12th 2012, 08:18 AM #3
Re: Historians all agree...
Human embryos are living human beings precisely because they possess the single defining feature of human life that is lost in the moment of death—the ability to function as a coordinated organism rather than merely as a group of living human cells. Maureen L. Condic (Click Here)Government by the people is always preferable to government by the judiciary. Brian Fahling Senior trial attorney for the Center for Law & PolicyThe philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next. Abraham LincolnUnless you say, "Yes, I'm a sinner who needs forgiveness" and accept God's free gift of salvation, your answer is "No" by default. We report, you decide.
-
July 12th 2012, 10:30 AM #4
Re: Historians all agree...
Not only do the words and actions of the followers of Jesus point to the truth of his resurrection, but had his resurrection that was being preached not been true, you can be sure that the Jews at the time would've made a such a huge issue of it that it would be recorded in history.
The Jews were adamant about their written law and the laws that proved something true are the same laws that are used to prove something false. Therefore, had the story of the resurrection been false the Jews would've provided the necessary 2 or more witnesses to prove the story as fictitious. Just the fact that the Jews today do not have anything recorded as such in their books (that are meticulous), is proof in itself that the resurrection is true.
Blessings
DougPlease read and support “Modern Day Prophet” by Douglas Duncan; Button for free Google preview of the first 3 1/2 chapters appears on this bookdepository.com page http://www.bookdepository.com/Modern.../9781457502941
Similar Threads
-
Gospels not written by historians....
By princesa in forum Christianity 201Replies: 18Last Post: December 12th 2011, 08:43 AM -
Calling All Historians
By slaveofone in forum General Theistics 101Replies: 2Last Post: February 27th 2008, 04:06 PM -
historians never mentioned jesus?
By 4ward in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 138Last Post: January 30th 2008, 03:54 AM -
Canadian Historians
By Storico in forum Military History 201Replies: 2Last Post: December 11th 2006, 01:38 PM -
Jesus Myth? The Historians reply.
By John Powell in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 82Last Post: December 4th 2003, 05:49 PM















































































Quote



The Silence of God
Today, 09:39 AM in Deeper Waters