God-particle article slams religion - Page 2

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    Results 16 to 23 of 23
    1. #16
      marke's Avatar
      marke is offline tWebber
      Confused
       
      Join Date
      May 23rd, 2012
      Posts
      306
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by pancreasman View Post
      Gosh, what a well thought out, supported opinion. This from a guy who apparently thinks the sun is burning coal since Neutrinos are an evil evolutionary lie.
      I said nothing about the sun burning coal and it was talkorigins which said "the neutrino was first invented as an ad hoc hypothesis, in order to save the laws of conservation of energy and momentum from falsification (when attempting to prove the theory of nuclear energy as the sun's energy source.)" Talkorigins also said, "Now ad hoc hypotheses, invented purely to save our favorite theories, are generally frowned upon in science, and for good reason." Tell me about it.

      The bottom line is that if you evolutionists do not like what other evolutionists are reporting in their articles, then you boys need to get that fixed for yourselves. Creationists already know the truth and these kinds of problems among evolutionists are not going to be solved by the sensible reporting of creationists alone.

    2. #17
      pancreasman's Avatar
      pancreasman is offline Life is a song. Sing it.
      Amused
       
      Join Date
      December 30th, 2009
      Posts
      6,095
      Male - Apophatic
      Blog Entries
      10
      Mentioned
      1 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by marke View Post
      I said nothing about the sun burning coal and it was talkorigins which said "the neutrino was first invented as an ad hoc hypothesis, in order to save the laws of conservation of energy and momentum from falsification (when attempting to prove the theory of nuclear energy as the sun's energy source.)" Talkorigins also said, "Now ad hoc hypotheses, invented purely to save our favorite theories, are generally frowned upon in science, and for good reason." Tell me about it.

      The bottom line is that if you evolutionists do not like what other evolutionists are reporting in their articles, then you boys need to get that fixed for yourselves. Creationists already know the truth and these kinds of problems among evolutionists are not going to be solved by the sensible reporting of creationists alone.
      Sorry to misrepresent you. Please inform us of your theory for the sun's energy source.
      One blue sky above us
      One ocean lapping all our shore
      One earth so green and round
      Who could ask for more

      Pete Seeger

    3. #18
      Tiggy's Avatar
      Tiggy is offline can't stand IDCer dishonesty
      Thinking
       
      Join Date
      January 17th, 2004
      Location
      x
      Posts
      10,811
      Male - personal
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by pancreasman View Post
      Sorry to misrepresent you. Please inform us of your theory for the sun's energy source.
      OT, but your avatar is great shot of Harpo tossing a classic "Gookie"!

      - T
      "First understand, then criticize! Not the other way round." - Per Ahlberg, TR

      Jorge Stock Excuse Quick Reference Guide:

      1) You're drunk / high on drugs
      2) You're too stupid / ignorant / dishonest to understand
      3) Explaining is a waste of time
      4) This assertion is true because I said so
      5) This assertion is even truer because I said so twice
      6) I already provided evidence (in huge detail) but I won't repeat it or link to it.

    4. #19
      Carrikature's Avatar
      Carrikature is offline Seeking Truth
      Question
       
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2009
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      6,434
      Male - Non-theist
      Blog Entries
      2
      Mentioned
      1 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by Tiggy View Post
      OT, but your avatar is great shot of Harpo tossing a classic "Gookie"!

      - T
      I'm pretty sure that's on topic at this point.
      This is not a song. It's a sandwich.

    5. The following tWebber says Amen to Carrikature for this useful Post:


    6. #20
      shunyadragon's Avatar
      shunyadragon is offline tWebber
      Thinking
       
      Join Date
      April 23rd, 2004
      Location
      Hillsborough, NC
      Posts
      18,687
      Male - Baha'i
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by nrajeff View Post
      I just read this WP article on the discovery of the Higgs boson and its implications, and I didn't like this part:



      http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...d=pm_local_pop

      Anyone have a comment?
      The Higgs Boson is relatively important discovery in Physics, but the name 'God particle' is a bad layman's name and leads to foolish notions. This discovery like true science bears no relationship to religious beliefs of any sort.
      Go with the flow the river knows.

      Frank Doonan
      Hillsborough, NC 27278

      Gifts of jade-silk change weapons and war into peace and friendship.

      I do not know, therefore I think . . . and everything is in pencil.

    7. The following tWebber says Amen to shunyadragon for this useful Post:


    8. #21
      OmniSkeptical's Avatar
      OmniSkeptical is offline tWebber
      Bored
       
      Join Date
      January 23rd, 2011
      Posts
      1,063
      Undisclosed - Unitarian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by wattsr1 View Post
      Heh. I know of one YEC who appears to think that the Higgs is some kind of atheist/evolutionist nonsense to find their version of God.
      I don't agree with the interpretation of it as God-Particle. It doesn't have the complexity to create the universe. One Higgs does not make the universe. Why am I not impressed when they say the Higgs proof for anti-theism? I think the opposite can occur when you look at the data correctly.
      There is so much negativity that seems to hold the universe together.

    9. #22
      pancreasman's Avatar
      pancreasman is offline Life is a song. Sing it.
      Amused
       
      Join Date
      December 30th, 2009
      Posts
      6,095
      Male - Apophatic
      Blog Entries
      10
      Mentioned
      1 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion

      Quote Originally posted by OmniSkeptical View Post
      I don't agree with the interpretation of it as God-Particle. It doesn't have the complexity to create the universe. One Higgs does not make the universe. Why am I not impressed when they say the Higgs proof for anti-theism? I think the opposite can occur when you look at the data correctly.
      Duh! The whole 'God particle' terminology is a side issue:

      In mainstream media it is often referred to as "the God particle", after the title of Leon Lederman's book on the topic (1993). Although the proposed particle is both important and elusive, the epithet is strongly disliked by physicists, who regard it as inappropriate sensationalism since the particle has nothing to do with God nor any mystical associations, and because the term is misleading: the crucial focus of study is to learn how the symmetry breaking mechanism takes place in nature - the search for the boson is part of, and a key step towards, this goal.
      from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
      One blue sky above us
      One ocean lapping all our shore
      One earth so green and round
      Who could ask for more

      Pete Seeger

    10. #23
      JonF's Avatar
      JonF is offline tWebber
      Innocent
       
      Join Date
      October 23rd, 2003
      Posts
      1,467
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: God-particle article slams religion


    11. The following 3 tWebbers say Amen to JonF for this useful Post:


    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Similar Threads

    1. Article on Religion
      By Alex44 in forum Literature Section
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: September 7th 2007, 02:23 AM
    2. True Religion (Article)
      By Cu Mhorrigan in forum Civics 101
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: May 19th 2006, 03:18 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •