Nothingburger updates

[demi-conservative]

(banned are Starlight, Tassman, Sea of Red, firstfloor, JimL)

They're going after Jill Stein!!

Third party candidate Jill Stein was a surprising addition this week to investigators casting an increasingly wide net in the congressional probe into Russian interference in the election.

Stein’s name was included in a Senate Judiciary Committee letter requesting all communication between President Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. and a number of others, including Russian officials and other members of Trump’s presidential campaign.

Stein ran for president as the Green Party candidate in 2016. A Green Party spokesman called the inclusion of her name “vengeance against Dr. Stein for running as a third-party candidate for the White House.”
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...a-and-trump-jr

Did not see this coming!

[firstfloor]

(banned are Starlight, Tassman, Sea of Red, firstfloor, JimL)

This is not permissible.

[firstfloor]

Also, I don’t want to leave you with the impression that I am not posting in your thread because you think I should be prevented from doing so.

[demi-conservative]

Also, I don’t want to leave you with the impression that I am not posting in your thread because you think I should be prevented from doing so.

We have all been enlightened by threadjack of yours!!

Thanks for another illustration why libtards like you should be banned.

[Mountain Man]

Classic fishing expedition. Same with Mueller wanting access to the President's tax returns. They've got nothing. Somebody with a spine needs to put an end to this whole charade.

[Sparko]

banning people in the OP is allowed. if someone asks you to leave later, we ask that you do so out of politeness but it is not mandatory until a moderator says so after the request is made official by reporting it.

[Jedidiah]

Demi, please read the posts at this link. Your approach to banning is not acceptable. http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...om-your-thread

[demi-conservative]

Demi, please read the posts at this link. Your approach to banning is not acceptable. http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...om-your-thread

It says:

The thread owner can limit who can participate in the first post. They can say "Only Christians" or "Only people who wear blue jeans" "no spamming" or whatever. IF they have a history of problems with certain posters, they may request that those people not participate. But this is not to be taken to extremes and can be denied by moderator decision if we believe it is being abused. In other words, you can't just use this power to keep any critics out of your thread so you can "win"

Firstfloor went offtopic on last thread of mine to derail it, and also in this one! I think it reasonable to ban all these derailers, including but not just Russia nuts!!

[Sparko]

It says:



Firstfloor went offtopic on last thread of mine to derail it, and also in this one! I think it reasonable to ban all these derailers, including but not just Russia nuts!!

but instead of reporting firstfloor when he posted you responded to him which allows him to respond to you.

also you are not allowed to just ban people just so you have no opposition to your viewpoint.

[demi-conservative]

but instead of reporting firstfloor when he posted you responded to him which allows him to respond to you.

Okay, I'll not respond to him next time!!

also you are not allowed to just ban people just so you have no opposition to your viewpoint.

That's just ridiculous accusation, for two reasons. First, Shuny and Leonhard disagreed in last thread of mine, and they still can post!!

Second, I like smashing libs and stupid opposition of theirs (see hundreds of posts of mine) but it's nice to have thread on two that is on topic!

[Sparko]

Okay, I'll not respond to him next time!!



That's just ridiculous accusation, for two reasons. First, Shuny and Leonhard disagreed in last thread of mine, and they still can post!!

Second, I like smashing libs and stupid opposition of theirs (see hundreds of posts of mine) but it's nice to have thread on two that is on topic!

I wasn't saying that was what you were doing. just giving you a heads up.

[demi-conservative]

but it's nice to have thread on two that is on topic!

Which this is not, because firstfloor did successful derail

I wasn't saying that was what you were doing. just giving you a heads up.

Okay!!

[Adrift]

Okay, I'll not respond to him next time!!



That's just ridiculous accusation, for two reasons. First, Shuny and Leonhard disagreed in last thread of mine, and they still can post!!

Second, I like smashing libs and stupid opposition of theirs (see hundreds of posts of mine) but it's nice to have thread on two that is on topic!

What's with the lack of prepositions, and definite and indefinite articles in your posts? Your posts sound like you're constantly out of breath.

[Mountain Man]

I've assumed he's not a native English speaker.

[rogue06]

What's with the lack of prepositions, and definite and indefinite articles in your posts? You posts sound like you're constantly out of breath.

It's an imitation of how stereotypical Russians speak English.