Praying to Mary is worshiping Mary

[robrecht]

No, you didn't ban him. All you did was announce his banning with glee, in a thread where he just happened to be mocking one of your major beliefs.

I can't speak for Old Bad Pig, but I do not consider prayer with/to saints to be a major belief. I think it is rather minor. Obviously some of those who oppose the practice see it as a huge issue, ie, idolatry.

[Obsidian]

As far as I'm concerned, a person doesn't have to "pull the trigger" to be responsible for something. You come on here and call him a "persona non grata," and then dissociate yourself from the act? Whatever. I would like to know who banned him then.

[Spartacus]

As far as I'm concerned, a person doesn't have to "pull the trigger" to be responsible for something. You come on here and call him a "persona non grata," and then dissociate yourself from the act? Whatever. I would like to know who banned him then.

See this thread: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...et-decapitated

Sparko posted the notice; BTC initially threatened to ban him.

Before you defend foudroyant, maybe you ought to review his conduct a bit more closely.

[Obsidian]

A pretext. I observed Cow Poke come into the repentance thread and start provoking him for no reason, right before he made that obviously non-serious post. But I guess y'all got what you wanted. I am sad to see that Sparko was involved.

[Spartacus]

If it's a pretext, it's one Foud provided not only willingly, but enthusiastically.

Do you think Foud's argument in this thread was sound? Was his consistent antagonism toward anyone who disagreed with him justified?

[tabibito]

A pretext. I observed Cow Poke come into the repentance thread and start provoking him for no reason, right before he made that obviously non-serious post. But I guess y'all got what you wanted. I am sad to see that Sparko was involved.

He was warned by TWeb the day before he was banned Obsidian. I'm not privy to the content of the private message that was sent, but it was sent. And the action by TWeb is only part of the overall picture.

[One Bad Pig]

No, you didn't ban him. All you did was announce his banning with glee, in a thread where he just happened to be mocking one of your major beliefs.

Strike three! I am amused by your insinuation that I felt threatened by foudroyant's ineffectual flailings. I am mildly annoyed that you think I would stoop to banning someone because they emphatically disagreed with my beliefs. Worried you're next or something?

[tabibito]

Strike three! I am amused by your insinuation that I felt threatened by foudroyant's ineffectual flailings. I am mildly annoyed that you think I would stoop to banning someone because they emphatically disagreed with my beliefs. Worried you're next or something?

Eh? You banned me? .... Why wasn't I told?

[Bill the Cat]

I would like to know who banned him then.

All 4 owners of the web site banned him based on events that you are not privy to - specifically PM conversations. He earned banishment using the same criteria we ban others for.

[apostoli]

Galatians 4:8

There is only one God but by praying to her they have made her their god. She is a false god but a "for" for them.

And who is that? According to Jesus there is only one true God. According to A.Paul there is to Christians only one God the Father! So is it you deny Jesus' testimony in A.John's testimony to his disciples that if you have seen/perceived him you have seen/perceived him that sent him?

_______________________

oops! I should have read the entire thread since last posting. foudroyant has been banned for her stupidity and lack of reason. Seems, to me, she set herself up as a reasonable prospect...